Thanks for your comments, Alexey.
I've now incorprorated all of the requested changes and am testing the
driver. If everything is still fine, I'll repost later today.
--
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gnumonks.org/
===
Mark Fasheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:46:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Actually I think it's rather sick. Taking O_NONBLOCK and making it a
> > lock-manager trylock because they're kinda-sorta-similar-sounding? Spare
> > me. O_NONBLOCK means "open this file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>>4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
>>initially caused are now sorted out.
>>
>>Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
>
Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the only user is their tools I would say let it go ahead and be cute, even
> sickeningly so. It is not supposed to be a general dlm api, at least that
> is
> my understanding. It is just supposed to be an interface for their tools.
> Of co
Hi Nish,
thanks for your comments.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:13:43PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 9/3/05, Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Below you can find a driver for the Omnikey CardMan 4040 PCMCIA
> > > Smartcard Reader.
> >
> > #define CCID_DRIVER_BULK_DEFAULT_TIMEOU
Chase Venters wrote:
>> Is there another way to do this? If the password is crypted, I need a
>> passphrase or something other to decrypt it again. Not really a solution
>> of the problem.
>>
>> Therefore, it would be best, to hide it by preventing stracing of the
>> application to all users and ro
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:28:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> If there is already a richer interface into all this code (such as a
> syscall one) and it's feasible to migrate the open() tricksies to that API
> in the future if it all comes unstuck then OK.
> That's why I asked (thus far unsucces
On 9/4/05, Paul Misner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2005 5:58 pm, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > I just bought a new notebook. Here is the output from lspci using the
> > latest pci.ids file from sourceforge:
> >
> ...
> > controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:23:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > What would be an acceptable replacement? I admit that O_NONBLOCK -> trylock
> > is a bit unfortunate, but really it just needs a bit to express that -
> > nobody over here cares what it's called.
>
> The whole idea of reinterpretin
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Filter incoming data, looking for ICMP messages:
>>
>> tcpdump -f "ip proto \icmp"
>>
>> Well, that catches nothing.
We aren't handling the reading of specific fields like the IP protocol
field correctly. This patch should make it work again.
Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:28:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > If there is already a richer interface into all this code (such as a
> > syscall one) and it's feasible to migrate the open() tricksies to that API
> > in the future if it all comes unstuck
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:36 +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >>4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> >>initially caused are n
Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> network connectivity on my router. Upon further inspection I noticed the
> packet had actually caused a kernel panic (visible only on the monitor, now
> also unresponsive).
Thanks for the report. I'll try to track it down.
If you could jot down the i
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd_emu10k1: Unknown parameter `'
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello0621
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Peter Münster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > > * Peter Münster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > with 2.6.12.4 no problem. But with a newer version, I get a black screen
> > > > and no more network acce
Mark Fasheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:23:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > What would be an acceptable replacement? I admit that O_NONBLOCK ->
> > > trylock
> > > is a bit unfortunate, but really it just needs a bit to express that -
> > > nobody over here care
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > Can I ask why you want to hide the database password from root?
>
> It's easy: for security reasons. There could always be some bugs in some
> software, which makes it possible for some other user, to gain root
> pr
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:53, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> This one certainly goes into the Bizarro file.
>
> Just out of curiosity -- when you use the powered hub, does the drive work
> even if you remove that delay completely?
I haven't tested that. I will, next time I need the drive, which will p
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Chase Venters wrote:
> >> Is there another way to do this? If the password is crypted, I need a
> >> passphrase or something other to decrypt it again. Not really a solution
> >> of the problem.
> >>
> >> Therefore, it would be bes
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:18:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I thought I stated this in my other email. We're not intending
> > to extend dlmfs.
>
> Famous last words ;)
Heh, of course :-)
> I don't buy the general "fs is nice because we can script it" argument,
> really. You
Hi,
On Sep 04 at 02:50:07, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > SMBus
>
> Is there anything on there that you actually want to talk to?
Smart batteries are accesed thru the SMBus. If you want to know
battery information, like the charge, you need to talk to the
Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't see how that works easily. I'm not worried about a
> tarball (eventually Red Hat and SuSE and Debian would have it). I'm
> thinking about this shell:
>
> exec 7 do stuff
> exec 7
> If someone kills the shell while stu
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:18:36AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> take-and-drop-lock -d domainxxx -l lock1 -e "do stuff"
Ahh, but then you have to have lots of scripts somewhere in
path, or do massive inline scripts. especially if you want to take
another lock in there somewhere.
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd_emu10k1: Unknown
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:23:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
Thanks, I put this in.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
Hi,
I've noticed that 8250_hp300 is buggy wrt the ordering of hardware
initialisation to the visibility of devices to user space. Namely,
8250_hp300 does the following:
line = serial8250_register_port(&port);
...
/* Enable board-interrupts */
out_8(d->resource.start + DIO
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:55:42AM -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm1/
>
I got:
<7>Dead loop on netdevice eth0, fix it urgently!
When using netconsole and printing out some information from kernel to
console.
The box
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:30:43AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Do not access children in struct device directly, use
> device_for_each_child helper instead. It fixes compilation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Given up waiting for John/Richard to okay this, applied anyway.
dragoran wrote:
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:58:00PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> I just bought a new notebook. Here is the output from lspci using the latest
> pci.ids file from sourceforge:
I'd suggest researching before buying.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:4
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:25:58AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> From: John Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This adds low-level suspend/resume support to locomo.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Shouldn't this be signed off by John himself? Not applied.
--
Russell King
Linu
Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> after moving some files on the server to a new location then trying to
> add the files
> to xmms playlist i found the following in dmesg after xmms froze
> wonder how many more items i can find...
The system includes some binary only stuff. Please contact yo
> 05:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g]
> 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02)
Give 'ndiswrapper' a try. Works pretty well for me.
Folkert van Heusden
--
Try MultiTail! Multiple windows with logfiles, filtered with regular
expressions, colored output,
On Friday 02 September 2005 22:17, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Also look, on the "set_pte" theme, at the attached patch.
> + WARN_ON(!pte_young(*pte) || pte_write(*pte) && !pte_dirty(*pte));
> This one has been firing on me, and I dec
On Saturday 03 September 2005 15:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the following small cleanups:
> - make two needlessly global functions static
> - every file should #include the header files containing the prototypes
> of it's global functions
While this is a nice cleanup, does any
After replacing the kernel on a fresh FC4 install with a stock 2.6.13
(using gcc 3.2) and my own config it appears that the clock is going too
fast: it gains at least an hour every 12 hours or so. FC4 kernel (rpm:
kernel-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4) seems ok
I tried the following from another system with re
Giampaolo Tomassoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> However, I'm still hearing for your comments about the usefulness of an
> ATMSAR layer.
Afaik all but one pci ADSL modems are out of tree drivers and include various
level of proprietary code. If Duncan is not interested in changing its code,
the u
2005/9/4, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> > initially caused are now sorted out.
> >
> > Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
>
> ndiswrapper
Ju
Hi!
This patch removes duplicate directory scanning code from fs/fat/dir.c. The
two functions that share identical code are fat_readdirx() and
fat_search_long(). This patch also renames fat_readdirx to __fat_readdir().
Tested on User-mode Linux with a small 16 MB vfat partition.
Signed-off-by: P
>> Well, those options lines are just wrong so I am not at all surprised
>> that it failed.
>>
>> It should be:
>> options snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0
>> options snd-intel8x0 index=0
>>
>> So, dragoran, what options lines do you have?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
Thanks James!
but I think those are the correct
>> Well, those options lines are just wrong so I am not at all surprised
>> that it failed.
>>
>> It should be:
>> options snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0
>> options snd-intel8x0 index=0
>>
>> So, dragoran, what options lines do you have?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
Thanks James!
but I think those are the correct
Hi,
Attached is a backport of the latest forcedeth version to 2.4. It
includes lots of changes, among them:
- a critical bugfix for nv_open(): ifdown/ifup cycles resulted in an
incomplete initialization that causes hangs after a few MB network traffic.
- jumbo frame support
- far better ethtoo
On 02:50 Sun 04 Sep , Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Audio ("unknown codec")
>
> snd-ati-atiixp ought to drive it - if it doesn't, that's probably a bug.
>
> > Modem ("no codec available")
>
> It's a winmodem. What were you expecting?
snd-atiixp-mode
On Friday 02 September 2005 09:08, Alex Davis wrote:
> ndiswrapper and driverloader will not work reliably with 4k stacks.
> This is because of the Windoze drivers they use, to which, obviously,
> they do not have the source. Since quite a few laptops have built-in
> wireless cards by companies who
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:12, Harald Welte wrote:
> cmx_llseek
just use
return nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
as your last statement in cmx_open() instead of
return 0;
to really disable any file pointer positioning (e.g. pwrite/pread too).
Addtionally cmx_llseek() is impl
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di
> Francois Romieu
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 14.01
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review -
Adrian Bunk wrote (ao):
> 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> initially caused are now sorted out.
>
> Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
>
> I'd like to:
> - get a patch into on of the next -mm kernels that unconditionally
> enables 4
On Tue, Feb 15, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Both the r128 and radeon drivers complain if they don't find an x86 option
> ROM
> on the device they're talking to. This would be fine, except that the
> message is incorrect--not all option ROMs are required to be x86 based. This
> small patch just re
On Sunday 04 September 2005 08:49, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 09:08, Alex Davis wrote:
> > ndiswrapper and driverloader will not work reliably with 4k stacks.
> > This is because of the Windoze drivers they use, to which, obviously,
> > they do not have the source. Since qu
Thanks to those who tested the swap prefetch code in its first public
iteration. Here is a respin of the code which improves its behaviour to be
virtually unnoticable, and fix a couple of bugs that showed up.
Changes:
This version is suspend aware
Swap prefetches are limited to SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - printk(KERN_ERR "radeonfb (%s): Invalid ROM signature %x should
> be"
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "radeonfb (%s): Invalid ROM signature %x
> should be"
> "0xaa55\n", pci_name(rinfo->pdev), BIOS_IN16(0));
While yo
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> After replacing the kernel on a fresh FC4 install with a stock 2.6.13
> (using gcc 3.2) and my own config it appears that the clock is going too
> fast: it gains at least an hour every 12 hours or so. FC4 kernel (rpm:
> kernel-
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 11:10:12AM +0200, David Gómez wrote:
> Smart batteries are accesed thru the SMBus. If you want to know
> battery information, like the charge, you need to talk to the SMBus.
Smart batteries are i2c devices, but you talk to them via the embedded
controller rather than via
Hi!
> > > One more piece of information. This is the one that loops:
> > >
> > > echo 30 > /sys/class/firmware/timeout
> >
> > Try echo -n ...
>
> Or revert gregkh-driver-sysfs-strip_leading_trailing_whitespace.patch.
> Obviously if you write 30\n and the write returns 2 then the shell wil
>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers".
ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care".
>I don't want the pain of debugging crashes on the machines which run unknown
>code
>in kernel space.
I'm not asking you to debug crashes. I'm simply requesting that the
for my V2311US with Broadcom 4318 these drivers worked with ndiswrapper:
ftp://ftp.support.acer-euro.com/notebook/ferrari_4000/driver/winxp64bit/80211g.zip
while these did not:
http://www.broadcom.com/products/Wireless-LAN/802.11-Wireless-LAN-Solutions/BCM94318
PCIID: 14e4:4318
the ati-drivers 8
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>>Ahh. Please change that to
>>
>>rm -rf tmp-empty-tree
>>mkdir tmp-empty-tree
>>cd tmp-empty-tree
>>git-init-db
>>
>>because otherwise you'll almost certainly hit something else lat
Giampaolo Tomassoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Well, the idea is that more pci devices may appear, as adsl-enabled
> embedded systems will begin to appear in the market.
>
> Also, I believe that adsl will carry much more services then just AAL5 for
> internet connection in the future.
I'd be h
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 23:47, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Hello,
I've bought "new" LS-120 drive and found that software eject does not
work with 2.6.13 kernel:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# eject /dev/hdc
eject: unable to eject, last error: Invalid argument
The drive spins up and af
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 17:31 +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >>Ahh. Please change that to
> >>
> >>rm -rf tmp-empty-tree
> >>mkdir tmp-empty-tree
> >>cd tmp-empty-tree
> >>git-init-
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 at 02:50:07 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Additionally, the system clock runs at 2x normal speed with PowerNow
> > enabled.
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927
Well that's the most bizarre tale of timer interrupt routing I
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> Dears,
>
> thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of the ATMSAR
> module.
>
> I attach a fixed version of the atmsar patch as a diff against the 2.6.13
> kernel tree.
>
[snip]
Just out of curiosity, is there ANY rea
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 01:24 +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> I am seeing it fill up my messages log as it is logging 1 or so messages each
> minute. I've emailed the SCSI maintainer James Bottomley twice about it but
> had no response either time.
OK, can you try this ... it should confirm the t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-kernel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herbert Xu
> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:24 AM
> To: Matt LaPlante
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13
>
> Matt LaPlante <
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Dears,
thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of the ATMSAR
module.
I attach a fixed version of the atmsar patch as a diff against the 2.6.13
kernel tree.
[snip
On Sunday 04 September 2005 7:49 am, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 09:08, Alex Davis wrote:
> > ndiswrapper and driverloader will not work reliably with 4k stacks.
> > This is because of the Windoze drivers they use, to which, obviously,
> > they do not have the source. Since
Giampaolo Tomassoni napsal(a):
I attach a fixed version of the atmsar patch as a diff against the 2.6.13
kernel tree.
static inline void dump_skb (char * prefix, unsigned int vc, struct
sk_buff * skb) {
what's this? 81+ chars on line
{ on a newline, please
' * ' --> ' *'
spin_lock_irqsav
On Sunday 04 September 2005 17:41, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >> Dears,
> >>
> >> thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of the ATMSAR
> >> module.
> >>
> >> I at
Herbert Xu wrote:
We aren't handling the reading of specific fields like the IP protocol
field correctly. This patch should make it work again.
I can't spot the problem, could you give me a hint?
I tried to move this logic into the new load_pointer function but it
all came out messy so I sim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Davis wrote:
>>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers".
>
> ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care".
While ndiswrapper might not be closed source, I would not call the
windows driver it loads open sou
On 9/4/05, Paul Misner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No one is asking you to 'care' about our problems running a notebook with a
> closed source driver under ndiswrapper.
Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained
and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it i
* Stefan Smietanowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex Davis wrote:
> >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers".
> >
> > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care".
>
> While ndiswrapper might not be c
Add the subsystem PCI devid to the list (on top of 2.6.13).
- Davide
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi
diff -Nru linux-2.6.13/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
linux-2.6.13.mod/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
--- linux-2.6.13/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c 2005-09-03 15:59:25.0
-0700
+++
> Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained
> and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it is indeed
> ripped out of mainline kernel, you can always keep it a separate patch
> for ndiswrapper.
Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all
c
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > The one message strinking me as odd during the boot-process is:
> > Jul 21 19:50:01 kasbah kernel: AC'97 warm reset still in progress?
> > [0x]
>
> More details: If I unload the sounddriver:
>
> # rm
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Sunday 04 September 2005 17:41, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Dears,
thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of th
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
We aren't handling the reading of specific fields like the IP protocol
field correctly. This patch should make it work again.
I can't spot the problem, could you give me a hint?
Never mind, I got it, we never fall through to the second switch
state
Hello again,
Got some more info that may be of value here. After I saw gcc coredump
on me with 2.6.13 I tried halting my system and I saw a kernel panic
while shutting down. The stack trace it showed me was:
flush_tlb_mm+201
exit_mmap+249
mmput+49
do_exit+434
sys_reboot+264
__grou
Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
Just a thought : why couldn't ndiswrapper set apart some piece
of memory and use it as the stack by changing the esp register
before executing windows code.
Like http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.ndiswrapper.general/4737
It's dirty, I know, but after all th
>takelock domainxxx lock1
>do sutff
>droplock domainxxx lock1
>
> When someone kills the shell, the lock is leaked, becuase droplock isn't
> called.
Why not open the lock resource (or the lock space) instead of
individual locks as file? It then looks like this:
open lock
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Alistair John Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 18.21
>
> ...omissis...
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there ANY reason why this has to be done in the
> kernel? The PPPoATM module for pppd implements (via linux-atm) a
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
>
> ...omissis..
On 9/4/05, Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-kernel-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herbert Xu
> > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:24 AM
> > To: Matt LaPlante
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re:
On Sunday 04 September 2005 19:36, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
[snip]
>
> This may be true for AAL5 support, which is the way by which data is
> actually transferred between ADSL DSLAMs and CPE equipment.
>
> This may not be generally true, however: most providers are already
> delivering internet+v
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33
A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
.
On Friday 02 September 2005 23:02, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > * The first 2 patches modify the PTE encoding macros and start preparing
> > the VM for the new situation (i.e. VMA which have variable protections,
> > which are called VM_NONUNIFORM. I dropped th
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
>
> ...omissis...
>
> The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
> function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
> And as company don't wan
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Bas Westerbaan wrote:
> > Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained
> > and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it is indeed
> > ripped out of mainline kernel, you can always keep it a separate patch
> > for ndiswrapp
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 04:23:04AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:36 +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > >>4Kb kernel stacks are
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
>
> ...omissis...
>
> The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
> function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
> And as company don't wan
On 9/4/05, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
> > after moving some files on the server to a new location then trying to
> > add the files
> > to xmms playlist i found the following in dmesg after xmms froze
> > wonder how many more items i can find
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> If there is already a richer interface into all this code (such as a
> syscall one) and it's feasible to migrate the open() tricksies to that API
> in the future if it all comes unstuck then OK. That's why I asked (thus
> far unsuccessfully
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:06:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:34:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > it seems you dropped
> > > > sched
On 03.09.2005 [18:14:48 +1000], Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:06, Russell King wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:01:08PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 17:58, Russell King wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:13:10PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > > Noon
> > Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all
> > configurations yet. Other situations may arise where 8K stacks may be
> > preferred. It is too early to kill 8K stacks imho.
>
> Please name situations where 8K stacks may be preferred that do not
> involve binary-only modul
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned
> long n)
> {
> BUG_ON((long) n < 0);
Ehh? It's unsigned. This will never be true.
> +unsigned long
> +__copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, c
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:10:54PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> I've got a few ideas that I think might help push Con's patch coalescing
> efforts in an arch-independent fashion.
Note that ARM contains cleanups on top of Tony's original work, on
which the x86 version is based.
Basically, T
Hi!
> - read-only mount
> - "specatator" mount (like ro but no journal allocated for the mount,
> no fencing needed for failed node that was mounted as specatator)
I'd call it "real-read-only", and yes, that's very usefull
mount. Could we get it for ext3, too?
On 04.09.2005 [21:26:16 +0100], Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:10:54PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > I've got a few ideas that I think might help push Con's patch coalescing
> > efforts in an arch-independent fashion.
>
> Note that ARM contains cleanups on top of Tony's o
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
