Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

2007-04-12 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andi Kleen wrote: > Hmm, does Xen perhaps not use interrupt stacks? Normally 2.7k should be still > green as long as there are not too many functions above/below it. > That's a good point, I'll need to check that. Still, nearly 3k of stack! J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects

2007-04-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:17:40 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the following patch series turns some menus into menuconfigs, so they > can be disabled whilst "walking" thorugh the parent menu So I merged the 23 of these which survived review and which do not intersect with

Re: [patch] uninline remove/add_parent() APIs

2007-04-12 Thread Roland McGrath
I'm travelling this week (through Monday) and can't be of much immediate help on improving the situation or explaining it in great detail. Last week before I left home I was deep in some strange debugging and didn't get a chance to look up. There will be more of that, but I'll try to make some ti

Re: [PATCH resend][CRYPTO]: RSA algorithm patch

2007-04-12 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Thu, April 12, 2007 23:13, Satyam Sharma wrote: > But timing attacks are not exclusive to RSA / asymmetric > cryptosystems. Such (side channel / timing / power measurement / bus > access) attacks are possible against AES, etc too. True, but those are often easier to protect, or are less vulnera

Re: intermittant petabyte usage reported with broadcom nic

2007-04-12 Thread CaT
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling > > /proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally > > though I get petab

Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

2007-04-12 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andi Kleen wrote: >> (This was under Xen, but there's no reason it couldn't happen on bare >> hardware.) >> > > Hmm, does Xen perhaps not use interrupt stacks? Looks like that's all done in do_IRQ, so it should be independent of whether its Xen or not. And the stack overflow check is perfo

Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

2007-04-12 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Matt Mackall wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:50:54PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> -#define HEAP_SIZE 0x3000 >> +#define HEAP_SIZE 0x4000 >> > > There are a bunch more of these that'll need fixing. > Like this? diff -r 2ad8a0729f26 arch/alpha/boot/m

Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

2007-04-12 Thread Andi Kleen
On Friday 13 April 2007 00:56:56 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> (This was under Xen, but there's no reason it couldn't happen on bare > >> hardware.) > >> > > > > Hmm, does Xen perhaps not use interrupt stacks? > > Looks like that's all done in do_IRQ, so it should be i

Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects

2007-04-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:50:12 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:17:40 +0200 (MEST) > Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the following patch series turns some menus into menuconfigs, so they > > can be disabled whilst "walking" thorugh the parent menu > > So I merge

Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

2007-04-12 Thread Matt Mackall
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:57:48PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:50:54PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > >> -#define HEAP_SIZE 0x3000 > >> +#define HEAP_SIZE 0x4000 > >> > > > > There are a bunch more o

Re: [PATCH UPDATE] deflate stack usage in lib/inflate.c

2007-04-12 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: >>> (This was under Xen, but there's no reason it couldn't happen on bare >>> hardware.) >>> >> Hmm, does Xen perhaps not use interrupt stacks? > > Looks like that's all done in do_IRQ, so it should be independent of > whether its Xen or not.

Re: [PATCH 0/13] maps: pagemap, kpagemap, and related cleanups

2007-04-12 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:43:30PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > This patch series introduces /proc/pid/pagemap and /proc/kpagemap, > which allow detailed run-time examination of process memory usage at a > page granularity. > The first several patches whip the page-walking code introduced for > /pr

Re: intermittant petabyte usage reported with broadcom nic

2007-04-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:52:49 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling > > > /proc/net/dev an

[PATCH] [DEBUG] sd-sched: monitor dynamic priority levels of a running task

2007-04-12 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
Hi, [ just in case, it can be of some avail for anybody ] target : 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 a very simplified but quite funny "toy" that [1] allows to monitor all the dynamic priority levels (counts a number of hits per level) on which a given task (configured via proc) is running; # echo "pid" > /pro

<    1   2   3   4   5