Hi!
This patch implements the functionality of jumping between the kexeced
kernel and the original kernel.
To support jumping between two kernels, before jumping to (executing)
the new kernel and jumping back to the original kernel, the devices
are put into quiescent state, and the state
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:16PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: use xor for mixing
With direct assignment, we can determine the twist table element used
for mixing (the high 3 bits of the table are unique) and reverse a
single step of mixing. Instead, use xor, which should also help
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This patch implements the functionality of jumping between the kexeced
kernel and the original kernel.
To support jumping between two kernels, before jumping to (executing)
the new kernel and jumping back to the original kernel,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:44:39 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can some please explain with almost identical kernel .config's I see
this on a p965 Intel board:
your bios programmed the machines differently...
the p965 has the higher performing settup, but still it's
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:51:54PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
I finally got around to testing Linux 2.6.24 (2.6.24-rc4) and found
that the it87 driver fails to probe and consequently, my sensors no
longer work. This was fine with Linux 2.6.23.8 (the last kernel I was
using)
The necessary
On Saturday 08 December 2007 01:43:28 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:51:58 -0500
Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:39 -0500, Shane wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 2:16 PM, Shane [EMAIL
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:14:09 +0100
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay - can I ask you to try out following patch.
Hello Sam,
Yes, your patch works for me.
Thank you very much.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index a5252f4..7fb1a2c 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -118,9
Ingo,
Due to email problems, I never got your reply on this thread. But I saw
your reply when reading this thread on lkml.org (nor did I receive Linus's
first reply).
Anyway, I booted 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 with the same config, and accepted the
defaults to the new config options as the git version I
Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ptrace_stop() decrements -group_stop_count to participate in group stop.
This looks very wrong to me, the task can in fact decrement this counter
twice.
If the tracee returns to the user-space before other threads complete the
group
stop, it will
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:17PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: do extraction before mixing
If an attacker manages to capture the current pool state, she can
determine the last 10 bytes extracted from the pool.
That's not true; we aren't just extracting data in the
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 07:01:04PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:16PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: use xor for mixing
With direct assignment, we can determine the twist table element used
for mixing (the high 3 bits of the table are unique) and reverse a
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marco Gatti wrote:
Today, I tested with different amounts of RAM:
2 GB: everything works fine
4 GB: same issue as described before with allocating block in system zone
So what to do, in order to use more than 2 Gigs of RAM?
Was there a dmesg out there somewhere?
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:05 -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
Kay Sievers wrote:
Is the udev daemon (still) running while it fails?
Yes, and there's something else I forgot to mention that may be
significant... For the bad case, in addition to udevd, ps -ef
shows a sh -e
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not kexec hacker... but maybe this is in good enough state to be
merged? It is useful on its own: kexec jump and back means we can dump
system then continue running, for example...
As far as I'm concerned, patches [1/4] and [2/4] can go.
The
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 18:47 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 09:42:39PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
I remember having installed openssh on an AIX machines years ago, and
being amazed by the number of sources it collected entropy from. Simple
commands such as ifconfig -a,
I have tried to search through the mailing list and it is not entirely
clear, but it looks like this has gone from the kernel: not least
because my driver reports:
drivers/sh/gdrom/gdrom.c:665: error: implicit declaration of function
'rq_for_each_bio'
I am not arguing for a stable ABI/API, I get
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:38PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: make backtracking attacks harder
At each extraction, we change (poolbits / 16) + 32 bits in the pool,
or 96 bits in the case of the secondary pools. Thus, a brute-force
backtracking attack on the pool state is less
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:39PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: step more rapidly through the pool when adding and extracting
Second, this patch spreads the mixing across the pool more rapidly by
using a larger step. For our secondary pools, we'll be sure to touch
both blocks with each
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:21:00PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: improve variable naming, clear extract buffer
- split the SHA variables apart into hash and workspace
- rename data to extract
- wipe extract and workspace after hashing
diff -r 924f9a441236 drivers/char/random.c
---
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 06:40:17PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
I'm working on strengthening forward security for cases where the
internals are exposed to an attacker. There are any number of
situations where this can and does happen, and ensuring we don't
expose ourselves to backtracking is a
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:24:22PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 14:58 +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote:
What I don't understand is thus why you are calling resource_to_bus
on 0x1f0
which is -not- a resource value, but is already a BAR value...
0x1f0 is
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML
here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing
the above regression. Rafael,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:05:54 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:51:54PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
I finally got around to testing Linux 2.6.24 (2.6.24-rc4) and
found that the it87 driver fails to probe and consequently, my
sensors no longer work. This was
Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
terminated with status 1
Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
config, please...
I sent the .config. Is there nothing else to follow up on? I have
tried rebuilding about seven kernels, tweaking the options each time.
All the
On 12/08/2007 11:30 AM, Miguel Botón wrote:
sparsemem-make-sparsemem-vmemmap-selectable.patch introduces a little bug.
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP can be enabled in an architecture that doesn't support it.
If the
architecture supports SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE is enabled,
so
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Now with MM
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:59:30 -0600 Jon Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can confirm that 2.6.24rc4 with the (second) patch works fine.
OK, thanks.
We haven't heard back from Ed yet. I'll sit on this for a few more days.
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ed L. Cashin [EMAIL
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:48:20 -0500 Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:39PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: step more rapidly through the pool when adding and extracting
Second, this patch spreads the mixing across the pool more rapidly by
using a
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:02:54 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43
Michael Cree wrote:
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:05 -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
Kay Sievers wrote:
Is the udev daemon (still) running while it fails?
Yes, and there's something else I forgot to mention that may be
significant... For the bad case, in addition to udevd, ps -ef
On Sunday December 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to search through the mailing list and it is not entirely
clear, but it looks like this has gone from the kernel: not least
because my driver reports:
drivers/sh/gdrom/gdrom.c:665: error: implicit declaration of function
From: Geoff Levand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP needs to be a selectable config option to
support building the kernel both with and without sparsemem
vmemmap support. This selection is desirable for platforms
which could be configured one way for platform specific
builds and the other
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:00:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:48:20 -0500 Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:39PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: step more rapidly through the pool when adding and extracting
Second, this
On 08-12-07 20:25, David P. Reed wrote:
In any case, my machine does not have an ISA bus. Why should it? It's
a laptop!
A bus is not something with expansion slots. Your machine has an ISA bus, or
LPC rather, if only to hang its BIOS of. That earlier report about BIOS
chips shitting
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:51:54PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:21:00PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: improve variable naming, clear extract buffer
- split the SHA variables apart into hash and workspace
- rename data to extract
- wipe extract and
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 06:46:12PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:10:10AM +0200, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
As long as /dev/random is readable for all users there's no reason to
use /dev/urandom for a local DoS...
Draining entropy in /dev/urandom means that insecure
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:45:50PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:38PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: make backtracking attacks harder
At each extraction, we change (poolbits / 16) + 32 bits in the pool,
or 96 bits in the case of the secondary pools. Thus, a
Adrian Bunk wrote:
And thinking about it, it doesn't seem to add any problems regarding
what I have in mind:
If we would ever stop having any well-defined link-order for in-kernel
code and express everything through initcall levels, we simply must
additionally update the modules.order
Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:55 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Kbuild now generates and installs modules.order along with modules.
This patch updates depmod such that it sorts module list according to
the file before generating output files. Modules which aren't on
modules.order
Robert Hancock wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index
(0) is beyond end of object [20070126]
ACPI
Greetings guys gals;
This was sent about an hour ago to the usb-devel list also.
-
Just a few minutes ago I needed to make use of my scanner, an Epson 1250u.
Firing up xsane, the usual select the device menu window didn't show, and it
went straight to my tv card as the only input
Sunday 09 December 2007 01:46:12 tarihinde Theodore Tso şunları yazmıştı:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:10:10AM +0200, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
As long as /dev/random is readable for all users there's no reason to
use /dev/urandom for a local DoS...
Draining entropy in /dev/urandom means that
Hi. Just a quick reply. Is /proc/bus/usb empty? Is there no symlink
named devices (and so you can't cat devices to see what is there)?
Also, (if /proc/bus/usb is empty), is /dev/bus/usb/devices not empty?
(When you cat devices does it list usb devices you have plugged in?) If
so, then
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 22:58 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:02:19PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sunday 02 December 2007 22:22:31 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Yeah, that could work. Have a header with stuff like this:
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
to., 06.12.2007 kl. 11.38 +0900, skrev Tejun Heo:
Thanks. Almost there. Can you please try the attached two patches and
report the boot log?
Here we go again.
Hmmm... Ah.. okay. Wrongly splitted patch. Can you please do it one
more time?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Index:
Hello,
Andrew Morton wrote:
Subject : PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
beyond end of object
Submitter: Hans de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
Handled-By : Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 06:21 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to mix the data with the pid+uid of the reading
process so that even if another one tries to collect data from urandom,
he cannot predict what another process will get ? BTW, I think that the
tuple
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to
use
Hello, (cc'ing Alan)
Andrew Morton wrote:
Subject : cd/dvd inaccessible in 2.6.24-rc2
Submitter: Will Trives [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/9/290
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
Handled-By : Len Brown [EMAIL
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 07:35:54PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:20:17PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
random: do extraction before mixing
If an attacker manages to capture the current pool state, she can
determine the last 10 bytes extracted from the pool.
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:00 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
But that is how we already handle this today, in numerous places in
the
kernel for this very type.
So, you can disagree that this is what we need to do, and if so, feel
free to fix up a whole lot of files in the tree :)
Heh, ok, allright,
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 02:12 +, Ralf Baechle wrote:
So where do we stand with this?
As I understand the Cobalt system controller it is not possible to address
ioport addresses below 0x1000 at all on the PCI bus of the GT-64111.
As such I think the best solution is a GT-64111-specific
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings guys gals;
Hi ,
This was sent about an hour ago to the usb-devel list also.
-
Just a few minutes ago I needed to make use of my scanner, an Epson 1250u.
Firing up xsane, the usual select the device menu window didn't show, and it
went
* Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/08/2007 04:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm wondering why it had no effect now
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index e0d3a4f..a46c252 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -47,15 +47,21 @@ void __init cpu_hotplug_init(void)
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
Critical temperature reached (255 C). However, the degrees number
is kinda hinting at 0xff all-ones field. Will try dump_stack in
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a kmap_atomic() debugging patch which I wrote ages ago and whcih
Ingo sucked into his tree. I don't _think_ this warning is present in
your tree at all.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/29/157 is where it starts.
I had a lenghty
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Does this report now win me the lucky draw, pretty please? ;)
>
> nah, you have to cc the acpi guys to get a prize ;)
Thought so shortly, but missed it.
> Andreas, please do separately report that WOL problem too..
Local
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:56:21 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> > It probably goes without saying, that gitfs should have some basic
> > configuration file to setup its transparent behaviour
>
> But then it's not *truly* transparent, is it?
Don't mistake transparency with some
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0) is
> > beyond end of object [20070126]
> > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method
On Oct 19, 2007 12:02 AM, Nick Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >And the last question, when do you expect/estimate this would happen?
>
> Jiri,
> To be honest, it would be hard to estimate at this point. I've discussed it
> with one of our
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been
On 12/08/2007 09:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately no change here.
>
> could you try to revert this change:
>
> -int softlockup_thresh = 10;
> +int softlockup_thresh = 60;
>
> i.e. change the value of softlockup_thresh back to 10. You should
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:15:54 +1100
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > +static int
> > +videobuf_vm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > {
> > struct page *page;
> >
> > - dprintk(3,"nopage: fault @ %08lx [vma
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 13:58 -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:15:42AM -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> >
> > > Dec 7 04:05:55 chaos kernel: sd 0:0:1:0: [sdb] Add. Sense: Peripheral
> > > device write fault
> >
Ben Crowhurst wrote:
> Loïc Grenié wrote:
>> 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> BPC
>>>
>>
I have tried it in a toy kernel. Oskit style. The code reuse is very
high specially with string ops
* Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Subject : Battery shows up twice in kpowersave
> > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9494
> > Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 03:40 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Subject : leds: ledtrig-timer calls sleeping function from
> invalid context
> Submitter : Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9264
> Handled-By: Richard
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:36:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Subject : PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
> > > beyond end of object
> > > Submitter : Hans de Bruin <[EMAIL
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:15:08 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:15:54 +1100
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > +static int
> > > +videobuf_vm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > >
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:30:39 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Subject : tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52
> > kmap_atomic_prot()
> > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > References
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been
Hi lkml,
Enabling FS quotas can take up to several minutes to finish and
depends on other users disk activity. This makes it a livelock (as it
can be finished anyway).
The problem described at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9520
Yes, if we need to enable quotas once in the system
On Thu 2007-11-29 23:58:44, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The simple case is
> > open
> > write cathedral and bazaar in some order
> > close
> > process -> label eric_t>
> >
> > open (eric_t) - SELinux "no"
> >
> >
> > Anyone smart will then
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:36:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Subject : PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
> > beyond end of object
> > Submitter : Hans de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
> >
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject : tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52
> kmap_atomic_prot()
> Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/29/157
>
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `sys_call_table32':
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.S:(.text+0x224e0): undefined reference to
> > `compat_sys_timerfd'
> > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> argh, sorry, I am soo fed up with fixing that patch.
>
> ---
* Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 December 2007 11:50, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > I guess your patch is fairly complex but it should work
>
> I should also add that although complex, it should have a much smaller
> TSC delta window in which the wrong scaling factor can
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 03:03 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:55 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Kbuild now generates and installs modules.order along with modules.
> > This patch updates depmod such that it sorts module list according to
> > the file before generating output
On 12/07/2007 06:51 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> thanks for tracking it down. Does the patch below help?
>
> oops, that should be the patch below. Otherwise the watchdog kernel
> threads will just loop around.
>
> Ingo
>
> ---
>
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 08:28 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> As I said, I don't think leaving duplicate lines in a file which will be
> installed, distributed and used widely is the RTTD.
For what it's worth, I changed the module processing in depmod so that
it doesn't output duplicate entries. Having
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:55 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Kbuild now generates and installs modules.order along with modules.
> This patch updates depmod such that it sorts module list according to
> the file before generating output files. Modules which aren't on
> modules.order are put after
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cut]
> > > > > Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
> > > Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to use
> > > arbitrary (sufficiently new) kernel to load the image and then restore the
> > > image kernel. So, you can hibernate 2.6.24-rc3 and use
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
> > Version control system is all about WORKFLOW B, where programmer
> > controls when it is time to commit (and in private repository he/she
> > can then rewrite history to arrive at "Perfect patch series"[*1*]);
> > something
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 09:28:15 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > Subject : Battery shows up twice in kpowersave
> > > Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > References :
Fixing:
CHECK mm/mmap.c
mm/mmap.c:1623:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
mm/mmap.c:1623:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
mm/mmap.c:1944:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Added by:
Dne so 8. prosince 2007 Mauricio Mauad Menegaz Filho napsal(a):
> 2007/12/7, CIJOML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi there,
> > ...
> > Can anybody else confirm this and contact those companies for source
> > codes?
>
> It seems that the sources are there:
>
> http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au/software/
>
There's a merging news happened two years ago:
http://www.open-iscsi.org/
Linux-iSCSI(sfnet) and Open-iSCSI projects merged!(April 11, 2005)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=111327337005048=2
so the information should change,
and there are needs about iscsi
Fixing:
CHECK kernel/params.c
kernel/params.c:329:41: warning: incorrect type in argument 8 (different
signedness)
kernel/params.c:329:41:expected int *num
kernel/params.c:329:41:got unsigned int *
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Compile-tested on x86 with
> it doesn't output duplicate entries. Having duplicates is not the right
> solution - especially modalias entries that depend entirely upon the
> file layout on disk when you run depmod against a kernel.
>
> Thanks for the ordering patches folks - a good idea!
And as it happens just what I need
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Sheela wrote:
> Share net is not supported , Rusty is an "idiot" .
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheela Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
tor, 06 12 2007 kl. 15:20 -0800, skrev Zach Brown:
> call_indirect() was using the wrong calling convention for the system call
> handlers. system call handlers would get mixed up arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/indirect_32.h
Share net is not supported , Rusty is an "idiot" .
Signed-off-by: Sheela Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt
index 7885ab2..722d4e7 100644
--- a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt
+++ b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.txt
@@
I try that, but it will take a lot of time!
Markus
> fre, 07 12 2007 kl. 23:52 +0100, skrev Markus:
> > Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
> > produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
> > do... would be nice.
> > Or a hit, in what
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 00:02 +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> > > What specifically is wrong with dev->sem ?
> >
> > Nothing really, other than that they use semaphores to avoid lockdep :-/
> >
> > I think I know how to annotate this, after Alan Stern explained all the
> > use cases,
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messages galore.
> > >
> > > Attached: configuration and dmesg
* Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately no change here.
could you try to revert this change:
-int softlockup_thresh = 10;
+int softlockup_thresh = 60;
i.e. change the value of softlockup_thresh back to 10. You should be
able to tweak this runtime as well, without patching the
201 - 300 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
