Re: [patch 24/26] mount options: fix tmpfs

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Thanks Miklos, that's a welcome enhancement, nicely done. I've only noticed one thing wrong (MPOL_PREFERRED shown as "default"); but thought shmem_config didn't add much value - I'd rather avoid those syntactic changes to unchanged code; and several tm

Re: [PATCH] Only print kernel debug information for OOMs caused by kernel allocations

On Monday 28 January 2008 06:52, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:24:21 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I recently suffered an 20+ minutes oom thrash disk to death and computer > > completely unresponsive situation on my desktop when some user program > > decided to gra

Re: [PATCH] remove duplicating priority setting in try_to_free_p

On Jan 28, 2008 2:33 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:29:23 -0500 "minchan kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > shrink_zones in try_to_free_pages already set zone through > > note_zone_scanning_priority. > > So, setting prev_priority in try_to_free_pages is n

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] bfs: remove multiple assignments

-inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; +inode->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; +inode->i_atime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; +inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; multiple assignments like "x = y = z = value;" can potentially (depending on the compiler and arch) be

Re: [RFC] Per-thread getrusage

Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:57:05 +0530 Vinay Sridhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Last year, there was discussion about per-thread getrusage by adding >> RUSAGE_THREAD flag to getrusage(). Please refer to the thread >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/4/308.

<    1   2   3   4