The driver not always prints the error code in case of a failure but this
information can be very useful for debugging. So let's print if available.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Hello,
This patch and 2/2 were only build tested because I don't have access
The driver not always prints the error code in case of a failure but this
information can be very useful for debugging. So let's print if available.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Hello,
This patch and 2/2 were only build tested because I don't have access to
a board using this
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:34:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/19/16 12:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:34:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/19/16 12:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On
Quoting Kees Cook (keesc...@chromium.org):
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:54 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> security_settime() uses a timespec, which is not year 2038 safe
> >> on 32bit systems.
Quoting Kees Cook (keesc...@chromium.org):
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:54 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> security_settime() uses a timespec, which is not year 2038 safe
> >> on 32bit systems. Thus this patch introduces the security_settime64()
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:57:32 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> Also, I understand there is one of these bitmaps per ring buffer, and
> the ring buffer is in the tens of megabytes.
Right, there's only one bitmap per tracing instance, which in most
cases is just one (I know of
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:57:32 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> Also, I understand there is one of these bitmaps per ring buffer, and
> the ring buffer is in the tens of megabytes.
Right, there's only one bitmap per tracing instance, which in most
cases is just one (I know of people who make
On 04/19/16 12:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
On 04/19/16 12:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
On April 19, 2016 12:25:03 PM PDT, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>On April 19, 2016 12:03:47 PM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>>"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>
- Support for reserving ptys for the system devpts instance using
/proc/sys/kernel/pty/reserve needs
On April 19, 2016 12:25:03 PM PDT, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>On April 19, 2016 12:03:47 PM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>>"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>
- Support for reserving ptys for the system devpts instance using
/proc/sys/kernel/pty/reserve needs to be removed.
Eric
On April 19, 2016 12:03:47 PM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>
>>>- Support for reserving ptys for the system devpts instance using
>>> /proc/sys/kernel/pty/reserve needs to be removed.
>>>
>>>Eric
>>
>> pty capping should probably be a devpts mount
On April 19, 2016 12:03:47 PM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>
>>>- Support for reserving ptys for the system devpts instance using
>>> /proc/sys/kernel/pty/reserve needs to be removed.
>>>
>>>Eric
>>
>> pty capping should probably be a devpts mount option
>
>There
On April 19, 2016 11:44:40 AM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> What this does is get rid of the horrible notion of having that
>>
>> struct inode *ptmx_inode
>>
>> be the interface between the pty code and devpts. By de-emphasizing
On April 19, 2016 11:44:40 AM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> What this does is get rid of the horrible notion of having that
>>
>> struct inode *ptmx_inode
>>
>> be the interface between the pty code and devpts. By de-emphasizing
>the
>> ptmx inode, a lot of
[...]
> Well I think we still have a very small sample size, the sun4i, sun5i and
> sun7i boards (all using the same mmc controller afaik) have the broken-hpi
> set, the sun6i and sun8i seem to be working fine (different mmc
> controller?).
> I'm not so sure it is an eMMC specific problem though.
[...]
> Well I think we still have a very small sample size, the sun4i, sun5i and
> sun7i boards (all using the same mmc controller afaik) have the broken-hpi
> set, the sun6i and sun8i seem to be working fine (different mmc
> controller?).
> I'm not so sure it is an eMMC specific problem though.
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> There's ~150 of these in the kernel.
>
> Maybe there's use for this conversion to be added
> to scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci or in
> a separate file.
>
> $ cat booltruefalse.cocci
> @@
> identifier fn;
> expression e;
> typedef bool;
>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> There's ~150 of these in the kernel.
>
> Maybe there's use for this conversion to be added
> to scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci or in
> a separate file.
>
> $ cat booltruefalse.cocci
> @@
> identifier fn;
> expression e;
> typedef bool;
>
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>- Support for reserving ptys for the system devpts instance using
>> /proc/sys/kernel/pty/reserve needs to be removed.
>>
>>Eric
>
> pty capping should probably be a devpts mount option
There is a max option so pty capping is a per devpts option.
> ,
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
>>- Support for reserving ptys for the system devpts instance using
>> /proc/sys/kernel/pty/reserve needs to be removed.
>>
>>Eric
>
> pty capping should probably be a devpts mount option
There is a max option so pty capping is a per devpts option.
> , and perhaps a
>
There's ~150 of these in the kernel.
Maybe there's use for this conversion to be added
to scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci or in
a separate file.
$ cat booltruefalse.cocci
@@
identifier fn;
expression e;
typedef bool;
symbol true;
symbol false;
@@
bool fn ( ... )
{
<...
- if (e)
There's ~150 of these in the kernel.
Maybe there's use for this conversion to be added
to scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci or in
a separate file.
$ cat booltruefalse.cocci
@@
identifier fn;
expression e;
typedef bool;
symbol true;
symbol false;
@@
bool fn ( ... )
{
<...
- if (e)
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20160418:
> >>>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20160418:
> >>>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> It's really too bad we can't just use follow_link :-/
Well follow_link is actually impossible to use as it doesn't exist
anymore. The routine now is get_link. ;-)
That said just to be certain of where everything stands I took a look to
verify that we
"H. Peter Anvin" writes:
> It's really too bad we can't just use follow_link :-/
Well follow_link is actually impossible to use as it doesn't exist
anymore. The routine now is get_link. ;-)
That said just to be certain of where everything stands I took a look to
verify that we can't.
I got
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:12 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path
> as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary
> adjustments to support Hyper-V.
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:12 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path
> as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary
> adjustments to support Hyper-V.
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
> ---
> V2: Addressed most of the
On 04/12/2016 02:33 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch adds pmic regulator supplies connected on the board.
> Rest of the invidual regulators would be added as and when required by
> the devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
> Acked-by: Bjorn
On 04/12/2016 02:33 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch adds pmic regulator supplies connected on the board.
> Rest of the invidual regulators would be added as and when required by
> the devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
> Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson
> ---
>
Hi Hoan,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:14 PM, hotran wrote:
> ACPI 6.1 has a HW-Reduced Communication Subspace Type 2 intended for
> use on HW-Reduce ACPI Platform, which requires read-modify-write sequence
> to acknowledge doorbell interrupt. This patch provides the implementation
>
Hi Hoan,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:14 PM, hotran wrote:
> ACPI 6.1 has a HW-Reduced Communication Subspace Type 2 intended for
> use on HW-Reduce ACPI Platform, which requires read-modify-write sequence
> to acknowledge doorbell interrupt. This patch provides the implementation
> for the
On 19/04/16 08:22, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> In some of platform, thermal sensors like NCT thermistors are
> connected to the one of ADC channel. The temperature is read by
> reading the voltage across the sensor resistance via ADC. Lookup
> table for ADC read value to temperature is referred to
On 19/04/16 08:22, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> In some of platform, thermal sensors like NCT thermistors are
> connected to the one of ADC channel. The temperature is read by
> reading the voltage across the sensor resistance via ADC. Lookup
> table for ADC read value to temperature is referred to
t://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux into perf/core
> (2016-04-16 11:09:57 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git
> tags/perf-core-for-mingo-20160419
>
> for you to fetch chan
b/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux into perf/core
> (2016-04-16 11:09:57 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git
> tags/perf-core-for-mingo-20160419
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 6566feafb4dba4
On April 19, 2016 11:22:24 AM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman
>> wrote:
>>> The devpts filesystem has a notion of a system or primary instance
>of
>>> devpts.
On April 19, 2016 11:22:24 AM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman
>> wrote:
>>> The devpts filesystem has a notion of a system or primary instance
>of
>>> devpts. To retain the notion of a primary system instance of
On April 19, 2016 10:19:47 AM PDT, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:55:28 + (UTC)
>Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
>> - On Apr 19, 2016, at 10:34 AM, rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
>wrote:
>>
>> > From: Steven Rostedt
On April 19, 2016 10:19:47 AM PDT, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:55:28 + (UTC)
>Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
>> - On Apr 19, 2016, at 10:34 AM, rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
>wrote:
>>
>> > From: Steven Rostedt
>> >
>> > In order to add the ability to let tasks that are
Jann Horn writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:35:20AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> +static inline bool is_dev_ptmx(struct inode *inode)
>> +{
>> +return inode->i_rdev == MKDEV(TTYAUX_MAJOR, PTMX_MINOR);
>> +}
>
> I'm not sure whether it matters, but I think a FUSE
Jann Horn writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:35:20AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> +static inline bool is_dev_ptmx(struct inode *inode)
>> +{
>> +return inode->i_rdev == MKDEV(TTYAUX_MAJOR, PTMX_MINOR);
>> +}
>
> I'm not sure whether it matters, but I think a FUSE filesystem
> should
Ok, I see your point, but it seems that minimum address that a process is
allowed to map is mmap_min_addr and not dac_mmap_min_addr.
This is because mmap_min_addr can be seen as the max(dac_mmap_min_addr,
CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR) which is correct (the minimum allowed address) but
Ok, I see your point, but it seems that minimum address that a process is
allowed to map is mmap_min_addr and not dac_mmap_min_addr.
This is because mmap_min_addr can be seen as the max(dac_mmap_min_addr,
CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR) which is correct (the minimum allowed address) but
Linus Torvalds writes:
> What this does is get rid of the horrible notion of having that
>
> struct inode *ptmx_inode
>
> be the interface between the pty code and devpts. By de-emphasizing the
> ptmx inode, a lot of things actually get cleaner, and we will
Linus Torvalds writes:
> What this does is get rid of the horrible notion of having that
>
> struct inode *ptmx_inode
>
> be the interface between the pty code and devpts. By de-emphasizing the
> ptmx inode, a lot of things actually get cleaner, and we will have a much
> saner way forward.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The qcom_cpuidle_ops structures is not over-written, so add "const"
> qualifier and replace __initdata with __initconst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang
Acked-by: Andy Gross
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The qcom_cpuidle_ops structures is not over-written, so add "const"
> qualifier and replace __initdata with __initconst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang
Acked-by: Andy Gross
On April 19, 2016 11:22:24 AM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman
>> wrote:
>>> The devpts filesystem has a notion of a system or primary instance
>of
>>> devpts.
On April 19, 2016 11:22:24 AM PDT, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman
>> wrote:
>>> The devpts filesystem has a notion of a system or primary instance
>of
>>> devpts. To retain the notion of a primary system instance of
Hi Tomi,
Just a humble suggestion/nitpick.
On 18 April 2016 at 16:46, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Add Tomi Valkeinen as omapdrm maintainer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen
> Cc: Rob Clark
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi,
Just a humble suggestion/nitpick.
On 18 April 2016 at 16:46, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Add Tomi Valkeinen as omapdrm maintainer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen
> Cc: Rob Clark
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:09:53AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:54:18PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 1bd047be37d9 ("tpm_crb: Use devm_ioremap_resource")
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
> >
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:09:53AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:54:18PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 1bd047be37d9 ("tpm_crb: Use devm_ioremap_resource")
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 39
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:04:49PM +, Reizer, Eyal wrote:
> Thanks! Glad the illustration helped.
> I will try it out again as if i recall cotrectly, i did try that l, and it
> didnt produce the correct waveform, but perhaps i didnt understand the usage
> of .cs_change correctly.
> Will
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:04:49PM +, Reizer, Eyal wrote:
> Thanks! Glad the illustration helped.
> I will try it out again as if i recall cotrectly, i did try that l, and it
> didnt produce the correct waveform, but perhaps i didnt understand the usage
> of .cs_change correctly.
> Will
On 04/19/2016 08:14 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:44:41 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 04/19/2016 06:01 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:41:07 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi,
On
On 04/19/2016 08:14 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:44:41 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 04/19/2016 06:01 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:41:07 +0300
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi,
On 04/19/2016 04:56 PM, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
Adding
> Add generic odd parity functions, adapted from
> "https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#ParityParallel;
Given a PARITY_MAGIC of 0x6996, this is even parity, not odd.
(Which it should be; an XOR of all bits is the "natural" form.)
> Add generic odd parity functions, adapted from
> "https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#ParityParallel;
Given a PARITY_MAGIC of 0x6996, this is even parity, not odd.
(Which it should be; an XOR of all bits is the "natural" form.)
There is a build problem on ia64 that slipped by. It is easy to
correct, so I will have to send another version of the patches.
Sorry for the noise,
David Daney
On 04/18/2016 02:13 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set
There is a build problem on ia64 that slipped by. It is easy to
correct, so I will have to send another version of the patches.
Sorry for the noise,
David Daney
On 04/18/2016 02:13 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:45:49PM -0400, Ira Weiny wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by what you are suggesting that "people will have to patch
> the driver with some vendor version if they really need it."?
>
> Could you elaborate?
There are lots of drivers where we simply did not accept these
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:45:49PM -0400, Ira Weiny wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by what you are suggesting that "people will have to patch
> the driver with some vendor version if they really need it."?
>
> Could you elaborate?
There are lots of drivers where we simply did not accept these
On 4/19/2016 2:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> What I think we need is something like the patch below. In the long
> ru nwe should also kill the mlx4_buf structure which now is pretty
> pointless.
Maybe; this could be the correct approach if we can guarantee that the
architecture can allocate
On 4/19/2016 2:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> What I think we need is something like the patch below. In the long
> ru nwe should also kill the mlx4_buf structure which now is pretty
> pointless.
Maybe; this could be the correct approach if we can guarantee that the
architecture can allocate
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
>> The devpts filesystem has a notion of a system or primary instance of
>> devpts. To retain the notion of a primary system instance of devpts
>> the code
Intel SR-IOV cards present different ID when running on Hyper-V.
Add the device IDs presented while running on Hyper-V.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
---
V4: No change from V1
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
>> The devpts filesystem has a notion of a system or primary instance of
>> devpts. To retain the notion of a primary system instance of devpts
>> the code needs a way to allow userspace to mount the
Intel SR-IOV cards present different ID when running on Hyper-V.
Add the device IDs presented while running on Hyper-V.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
---
V4: No change from V1
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path
as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary
adjustments to support Hyper-V.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
---
V2: Addressed most of the comments from
Alexander Duyck
On Hyper-V, the VF/PF communication is a via software mediated path
as opposed to the hardware mailbox. Make the necessary
adjustments to support Hyper-V.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
---
V2: Addressed most of the comments from
Alexander Duyck
and Rustad, Mark
Make adjustments to the Intel 10G VF driver to support
running on Hyper-V hosts.
K. Y. Srinivasan (2):
ethernet: intel: Add the device ID's presented while running on
Hyper-V
intel: ixgbevf: Support Windows hosts (Hyper-V)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h |5 +
Make adjustments to the Intel 10G VF driver to support
running on Hyper-V hosts.
K. Y. Srinivasan (2):
ethernet: intel: Add the device ID's presented while running on
Hyper-V
intel: ixgbevf: Support Windows hosts (Hyper-V)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h |5 +
Add support for the the INA3221 26v capable, Triple channel,
Bi-Directional, Zero-Drift, Low-/High-Side, Current/Voltage Monitor
with I2C interface.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
---
Documentation/hwmon/ina3221 | 35
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 11 ++
Add support for the the INA3221 26v capable, Triple channel,
Bi-Directional, Zero-Drift, Low-/High-Side, Current/Voltage Monitor
with I2C interface.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
---
Documentation/hwmon/ina3221 | 35
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 11 ++
drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1
Define a binding for the INA3221 Triple Current/Voltage Monitor.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ina3221.txt | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ina3221.txt
Hello all,
This series adds support for the INA3221 Triple Current/Voltage Monitor.
Changes from v1:
- rearranged and renumbered sysfs enteries
- added reading alert bits to sysfs
- removed internal power calculation
- added DT setting of shunt resistors
- various other minor fixups
Define a binding for the INA3221 Triple Current/Voltage Monitor.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ina3221.txt | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ina3221.txt
diff --git
Hello all,
This series adds support for the INA3221 Triple Current/Voltage Monitor.
Changes from v1:
- rearranged and renumbered sysfs enteries
- added reading alert bits to sysfs
- removed internal power calculation
- added DT setting of shunt resistors
- various other minor fixups
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 21:53 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> just do ITER_BVEC recvmsg
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 7 +++---
> fs/cifs/connect.c | 65
> -
> fs/cifs/file.c | 53
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 21:53 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> just do ITER_BVEC recvmsg
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 7 +++---
> fs/cifs/connect.c | 65
> -
> fs/cifs/file.c | 53
Kalle Valo writes:
> Jes Sorensen writes:
>
>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>>> The references to some arrays in the rtl8xxxu driver were moved inside
>>> of an #ifdef, but the symbols remain outside, resulting in build warnings:
>>>
>>>
Kalle Valo writes:
> Jes Sorensen writes:
>
>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>>> The references to some arrays in the rtl8xxxu driver were moved inside
>>> of an #ifdef, but the symbols remain outside, resulting in build warnings:
>>>
>>> rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.c:1506:33: error:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:26:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 15-04-16 22:05:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:48:29 -0600 Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > > When CONFIG_FS_DAX_PMD is set, DAX supports mmap() using pmd page
> > > size. This feature relies on
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:26:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 15-04-16 22:05:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:48:29 -0600 Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > > When CONFIG_FS_DAX_PMD is set, DAX supports mmap() using pmd page
> > > size. This feature relies on both mmap virtual
On 19/04/2016 19:31, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>> On 19/04/2016 16:59, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:05:19PM +0200, Mason wrote:
On 19/04/2016 15:13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:15:15PM
On 19/04/2016 19:31, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Mason wrote:
>> On 19/04/2016 16:59, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:05:19PM +0200, Mason wrote:
On 19/04/2016 15:13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:15:15PM
What I think we need is something like the patch below. In the long
ru nwe should also kill the mlx4_buf structure which now is pretty
pointless.
---
>From a493881d2a6c90152d3daabb7b6b3afd1d254d78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:12:14
What I think we need is something like the patch below. In the long
ru nwe should also kill the mlx4_buf structure which now is pretty
pointless.
---
>From a493881d2a6c90152d3daabb7b6b3afd1d254d78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:12:14 -0400
Subject:
Julia Lawall writes:
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Acked-by: Eric Anholt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Julia Lawall writes:
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Acked-by: Eric Anholt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The cpsw_ndo_open() could try to access CPSW registers before
calling pm_runtime_get_sync(). This will trigger L3 error:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147
l3_interrupt_handler+0x220/0x34c()
4400.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER M2 (64-bit) TARGET L4_FAST (Idle): Data
The cpsw_ndo_open() could try to access CPSW registers before
calling pm_runtime_get_sync(). This will trigger L3 error:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147
l3_interrupt_handler+0x220/0x34c()
4400.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER M2 (64-bit) TARGET L4_FAST (Idle): Data
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/irq/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc4 next-20160419]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Auger/KVM-PCIe-MSI-passthrough-on-ARM-ARM64
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/irq/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc4 next-20160419]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Auger/KVM-PCIe-MSI-passthrough-on-ARM-ARM64
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:26:44PM -0400, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 19:20 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >
>> > > I thought that PLATFORM served that purpose. Woudn't the host
>> > >
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:26:44PM -0400, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 19:20 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >
>> > > I thought that PLATFORM served that purpose. Woudn't the host
>> > > advertise PLATFORM
501 - 600 of 1760 matches
Mail list logo