4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Marc Zyngier
commit dd5f1b049dc139876801db3cdd0f20d21fd428cc upstream.
The INTID mask is wrong, and is made a signed value, which has
nteresting effects in the KVM
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andy Lutomirski
commit aaee8c3c5cce2d9107310dd9f3026b4f901d441c upstream.
Forcing in_interrupt() to return true if we're not in a bona fide
interrupt confuses the softirq
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 18:38 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22 2016 at 4:16P -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > >
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tom Lendacky
commit ab6a11a7c8ef47f996974dd3c648c2c0b1a36ab1 upstream.
The ccp-crypto module for AES XTS support has a bug that can allow requests
greater than 4096
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Marc Zyngier
commit dd5f1b049dc139876801db3cdd0f20d21fd428cc upstream.
The INTID mask is wrong, and is made a signed value, which has
nteresting effects in the KVM emulation. Let's sanitize
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andy Lutomirski
commit aaee8c3c5cce2d9107310dd9f3026b4f901d441c upstream.
Forcing in_interrupt() to return true if we're not in a bona fide
interrupt confuses the softirq code. This fixes
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 18:38 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22 2016 at 4:16P -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-21
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tom Lendacky
commit ab6a11a7c8ef47f996974dd3c648c2c0b1a36ab1 upstream.
The ccp-crypto module for AES XTS support has a bug that can allow requests
greater than 4096 bytes in size to be passed
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Will Deacon
commit 0106d456c4cb1770253fefc0ab23c9ca760b43f7 upstream.
Commit 66dbd6e61a52 ("arm64: Implement ptep_set_access_flags() for
hardware AF/DBM") ensured that pte
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Will Deacon
commit 0106d456c4cb1770253fefc0ab23c9ca760b43f7 upstream.
Commit 66dbd6e61a52 ("arm64: Implement ptep_set_access_flags() for
hardware AF/DBM") ensured that pte flags are updated
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Toshiaki Makita
[ Upstream commit 0b148def403153a4d1565f1640356cb78ce5109f ]
The missing br_vlan_should_use() test caused creation of an unneeded
local fdb entry
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nitin Gupta
[ Upstream commit 24e49ee3d76b70853a96520e46b8837e5eae65b2 ]
During hugepage map/unmap, TSB and TLB flushes are currently
issued at every PAGE_SIZE'd
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Babu Moger
[ Upstream commit d0c31e02005764dae0aab130a57e9794d06b824d ]
We noticed this panic while enabling SR-IOV in sparc.
mlx4_core: Mellanox ConnectX core driver
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Russell Currey
commit 871e178e0f2c4fa788f694721a10b4758d494ce1 upstream.
In the "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-bridge" RTAS calls, the
spec states that values of
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit d11c2a0de2824395656cf8ed15811580c9dd38aa ]
All signal frames must be at least 16-byte aligned, because that is
the alignment we
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Russell Currey
commit 871e178e0f2c4fa788f694721a10b4758d494ce1 upstream.
In the "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-bridge" RTAS calls, the
spec states that values of 9900-9905 can be
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit d11c2a0de2824395656cf8ed15811580c9dd38aa ]
All signal frames must be at least 16-byte aligned, because that is
the alignment we explicitly create when we
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Toshiaki Makita
[ Upstream commit 0b148def403153a4d1565f1640356cb78ce5109f ]
The missing br_vlan_should_use() test caused creation of an unneeded
local fdb entry on changing mac address of a
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nitin Gupta
[ Upstream commit 24e49ee3d76b70853a96520e46b8837e5eae65b2 ]
During hugepage map/unmap, TSB and TLB flushes are currently
issued at every PAGE_SIZE'd boundary which is unnecessary.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Babu Moger
[ Upstream commit d0c31e02005764dae0aab130a57e9794d06b824d ]
We noticed this panic while enabling SR-IOV in sparc.
mlx4_core: Mellanox ConnectX core driver v2.2-1 (Jan 1 2015)
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nitin Gupta
[ Upstream commit 36beca6571c941b28b0798667608239731f9bc3a ]
Orabug: 22495713
Currently, NUMA node distance matrix is initialized only
when a machine
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 9ea46abe22550e3366ff7cee2f8391b35b12f730 ]
On cheetahplus chips we take the ctx_alloc_lock in order to
modify the TLB lookup parameters
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nitin Gupta
[ Upstream commit 36beca6571c941b28b0798667608239731f9bc3a ]
Orabug: 22495713
Currently, NUMA node distance matrix is initialized only
when a machine descriptor (MD) exists.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 9ea46abe22550e3366ff7cee2f8391b35b12f730 ]
On cheetahplus chips we take the ctx_alloc_lock in order to
modify the TLB lookup parameters for the indexed
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ralf Baechle
commit d7de413475f443957a0c1d256e405d19b3a2cb22 upstream.
TASK_SIZE was defined as 0x7fff8000UL which for 64k pages is not a
multiple of the page size.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Westphal
commit bdf533de6968e9686df777dc178486f600c6e617 upstream.
We should check that e->target_offset is sane before
mark_source_chains gets called since it will
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Westphal
commit 54d83fc74aa9ec72794373cb47432c5f7fb1a309 upstream.
Ben Hawkes says:
In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it
is
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ralf Baechle
commit d7de413475f443957a0c1d256e405d19b3a2cb22 upstream.
TASK_SIZE was defined as 0x7fff8000UL which for 64k pages is not a
multiple of the page size. Somewhere further down the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Westphal
commit bdf533de6968e9686df777dc178486f600c6e617 upstream.
We should check that e->target_offset is sane before
mark_source_chains gets called since it will fetch the target
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Westphal
commit 54d83fc74aa9ec72794373cb47432c5f7fb1a309 upstream.
Ben Hawkes says:
In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it
is possible for a
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 7cafc0b8bf130f038b0ec2dcdd6a9de6dc59b65a ]
We must handle data access exception as well as memory address unaligned
exceptions from
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Westphal
commit 6e94e0cfb0887e4013b3b930fa6ab1fe6bb6ba91 upstream.
Otherwise this function may read data beyond the ruleset blob.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Westphal
commit 6e94e0cfb0887e4013b3b930fa6ab1fe6bb6ba91 upstream.
Otherwise this function may read data beyond the ruleset blob.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal
Signed-off-by: Pablo
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 7cafc0b8bf130f038b0ec2dcdd6a9de6dc59b65a ]
We must handle data access exception as well as memory address unaligned
exceptions from return from trap window
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ben Dooks
commit b66b2a0adf0e48973b582e055758b9907a7eee7c upstream.
The bcm_kona_gpio_reset() calls bcm_kona_gpio_write_lock_regs()
with what looks like the wrong
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tadeusz Struk
commit 6dc5df71ee5c8b44607928bfe27be50314dcf848 upstream.
Fix undefined reference issue reported by kbuild test robot.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maarten Lankhorst
commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 upstream.
It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
vmwgfx
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Frysinger
[ Upstream commit 1a40b95374f680625318ab61d81958e949e0afe3 ]
A system call trace trigger on entry allows the tracing
process to inspect and potentially change
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ben Dooks
commit b66b2a0adf0e48973b582e055758b9907a7eee7c upstream.
The bcm_kona_gpio_reset() calls bcm_kona_gpio_write_lock_regs()
with what looks like the wrong parameter. The
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tadeusz Struk
commit 6dc5df71ee5c8b44607928bfe27be50314dcf848 upstream.
Fix undefined reference issue reported by kbuild test robot.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maarten Lankhorst
commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 upstream.
It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
vmwgfx userspace. This was originally
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Frysinger
[ Upstream commit 1a40b95374f680625318ab61d81958e949e0afe3 ]
A system call trace trigger on entry allows the tracing
process to inspect and potentially change the traced
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jann Horn
commit 29d6455178a09e1dc340380c582b13356227e8df upstream.
Until now, hitting this BUG_ON caused a recursive oops (because oops
handling involves do_exit(), which
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jann Horn
commit 29d6455178a09e1dc340380c582b13356227e8df upstream.
Until now, hitting this BUG_ON caused a recursive oops (because oops
handling involves do_exit(), which calls into the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Huth
commit d23fac2b27d94aeb7b65536a50d32bfdc21fe01e upstream.
The SIAR and SDAR registers are available twice, one time as SPRs
780 / 781 (unprivileged, but
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Huth
commit d23fac2b27d94aeb7b65536a50d32bfdc21fe01e upstream.
The SIAR and SDAR registers are available twice, one time as SPRs
780 / 781 (unprivileged, but read-only), and one time as
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Huth
commit 8dd75ccb571f3c92c48014b3dabd3d51a115ab41 upstream.
We are already using the privileged versions of MMCR0, MMCR1
and MMCRA in the kernel, so for MMCR2, we
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: hongkun.cao
commit 5edf673d07fdcb6498be24914f3f38f8d8843199 upstream.
When a dual-edge irq is triggered, an incorrect irq will be reported on
condition that the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 397d1533b6cce0ccb5379542e2e6d079f6936c46 ]
Like a signal return, we should use synchronize_user_stack() rather
than
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Huth
commit 8dd75ccb571f3c92c48014b3dabd3d51a115ab41 upstream.
We are already using the privileged versions of MMCR0, MMCR1
and MMCRA in the kernel, so for MMCR2, we should better use
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: hongkun.cao
commit 5edf673d07fdcb6498be24914f3f38f8d8843199 upstream.
When a dual-edge irq is triggered, an incorrect irq will be reported on
condition that the external signal is not stable
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "David S. Miller"
[ Upstream commit 397d1533b6cce0ccb5379542e2e6d079f6936c46 ]
Like a signal return, we should use synchronize_user_stack() rather
than flush_user_windows().
Reported-by: Ilya
It is not quite clear what does mutex_lock(>lock) defend against.
If there is a chance that some other code can try to lock the mutex during
probe(),
then
mutex_unlock(>lock);
kfree(dev);
looks suspicious, because when that code get control form mutex_lock(dev->lock)
the dev could be
It is not quite clear what does mutex_lock(>lock) defend against.
If there is a chance that some other code can try to lock the mutex during
probe(),
then
mutex_unlock(>lock);
kfree(dev);
looks suspicious, because when that code get control form mutex_lock(dev->lock)
the dev could be
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tejun Heo
commit 3a06bb78ceeceacc86a1e31133a7944013f9775b upstream.
memcg_offline_kmem() may be called from memcg_free_kmem() after a css
init failure. memcg_free_kmem() is a
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tejun Heo
commit 3a06bb78ceeceacc86a1e31133a7944013f9775b upstream.
memcg_offline_kmem() may be called from memcg_free_kmem() after a css
init failure. memcg_free_kmem() is a ->css_free
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ezequiel Garcia
[ Upstream commit 049bbf589ec651685205bd8ce73221fdd62345cf ]
Commit fa50d974d104 ("ipv4: Namespaceify ip_default_ttl sysctl knob")
moves the
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ezequiel Garcia
[ Upstream commit 049bbf589ec651685205bd8ce73221fdd62345cf ]
Commit fa50d974d104 ("ipv4: Namespaceify ip_default_ttl sysctl knob")
moves the default TTL assignment, and as
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Huth
commit 7cc851039d643a2ee7df4d18177150f2c3a484f5 upstream.
If we do not provide the PVR for POWER8NVL, a guest on this system
currently ends up in PowerISA 2.06
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.6.3 release.
There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri Jun 24 22:36:56 UTC 2016.
Anything
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Huth
commit 7cc851039d643a2ee7df4d18177150f2c3a484f5 upstream.
If we do not provide the PVR for POWER8NVL, a guest on this system
currently ends up in PowerISA 2.06 compatibility mode
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.6.3 release.
There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri Jun 24 22:36:56 UTC 2016.
Anything
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: James Bottomley
commit a621bac3044ed6f7ec5fa0326491b2d4838bfa93 upstream.
When SCSI was written, all commands coming from the filesystem
(REQ_TYPE_FS
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
[ Upstream commit e5aed006be918af163eb397e45aa5ea6cefd5e01 ]
In case we find a socket with encapsulation enabled we should call
the encap_recv
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: James Bottomley
commit a621bac3044ed6f7ec5fa0326491b2d4838bfa93 upstream.
When SCSI was written, all commands coming from the filesystem
(REQ_TYPE_FS commands) had data. This meant that our
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
[ Upstream commit e5aed006be918af163eb397e45aa5ea6cefd5e01 ]
In case we find a socket with encapsulation enabled we should call
the encap_recv function even if just a udp
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com):
>> On 06/22/16 17:14, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com):
>> >> On 06/21/16 15:45, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> >>> Quoting Topi Miettinen
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com):
>> On 06/22/16 17:14, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Topi Miettinen (toiwo...@gmail.com):
>> >> On 06/21/16 15:45, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> >>> Quoting Topi Miettinen
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Daniel Borkmann
[ Upstream commit 612bacad78ba6d0a91166fc4487af114bac172a8 ]
Follow-up to commit e27f4a942a0e ("bpf: Use mount_nodev not mount_ns
to mount the bpf
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Daniel Borkmann
[ Upstream commit 612bacad78ba6d0a91166fc4487af114bac172a8 ]
Follow-up to commit e27f4a942a0e ("bpf: Use mount_nodev not mount_ns
to mount the bpf filesystem"), which removes
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Herbert Xu
[ Upstream commit 92964c79b357efd980812c4de5c1fd2ec8bb5520 ]
When we free cb->skb after a dump, we do it after releasing the
lock. This means that a
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ewan D. Milne
commit fbd83006e3e536fcb103228d2422ea63129ccb03 upstream.
Linux fails to boot as a guest with a QEMU CD-ROM:
[4.439488] ata2.00: ATAPI: QEMU CD-ROM,
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Richard Alpe
[ Upstream commit 039b941e136757b55c4cf775aab6068dfd94 ]
The publication field of the old netlink API should contain the
publication key and not the
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Herbert Xu
[ Upstream commit 92964c79b357efd980812c4de5c1fd2ec8bb5520 ]
When we free cb->skb after a dump, we do it after releasing the
lock. This means that a new dump could have started in
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ewan D. Milne
commit fbd83006e3e536fcb103228d2422ea63129ccb03 upstream.
Linux fails to boot as a guest with a QEMU CD-ROM:
[4.439488] ata2.00: ATAPI: QEMU CD-ROM, 0.8.2, max UDMA/100
[
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Richard Alpe
[ Upstream commit 039b941e136757b55c4cf775aab6068dfd94 ]
The publication field of the old netlink API should contain the
publication key and not the publication reference.
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jason Wang
[ Upstream commit addf8fc4acb1cf79492ac64966f07178793cb3d7 ]
We used to check dev->reg_state against NETREG_REGISTERED after each
time we are woke up. But after
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jason Wang
[ Upstream commit addf8fc4acb1cf79492ac64966f07178793cb3d7 ]
We used to check dev->reg_state against NETREG_REGISTERED after each
time we are woke up. But after commit 9e641bdcfa4e
Stephan and Tadeusz,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
On 06/09/2016 11:36 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016, 11:27:13 schrieb Mat Martineau:
Hi Mat, Tadeusz,
Ok, after checking the code again, I think that dropping that sanity check
should be ok given that
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jiri Pirko
[ Upstream commit da4ed55165d41b1073f9a476f1c18493e9bf8c8e ]
The problem is that fib_info->nh is [0] so the struct fib_info
allocation size depends on number of
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jiri Pirko
[ Upstream commit da4ed55165d41b1073f9a476f1c18493e9bf8c8e ]
The problem is that fib_info->nh is [0] so the struct fib_info
allocation size depends on number of nexthops. If we just
Stephan and Tadeusz,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
On 06/09/2016 11:36 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016, 11:27:13 schrieb Mat Martineau:
Hi Mat, Tadeusz,
Ok, after checking the code again, I think that dropping that sanity check
should be ok given that
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sabrina Dubroca
[ Upstream commit 1968a0b8b6ca088bc029bd99ee696f1aca4090d0 ]
In my last commit I replaced MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEYID by
MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEY.
Fixes: 8acca6acebd0
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Eric W. Biederman"
[ Upstream commit e27f4a942a0ee4b84567a3c6cfa84f273e55cbb7 ]
While reviewing the filesystems that set FS_USERNS_MOUNT I spotted the
bpf filesystem.
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sabrina Dubroca
[ Upstream commit 1968a0b8b6ca088bc029bd99ee696f1aca4090d0 ]
In my last commit I replaced MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEYID by
MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEY.
Fixes: 8acca6acebd0 ("macsec: key
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Eric W. Biederman"
[ Upstream commit e27f4a942a0ee4b84567a3c6cfa84f273e55cbb7 ]
While reviewing the filesystems that set FS_USERNS_MOUNT I spotted the
bpf filesystem. Looking at the code I
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Chen Haiquan
[ Upstream commit ce577668a426c6a9e2470a09dcd07fbd6e45272a ]
When create a new vxlan link, example:
ip link add vtap mtu 1440 type vxlan vni 1 dev eth0
The
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nicolas Dichtel
[ Upstream commit f0a3fdca794d1e68ae284ef4caefe681f7c18e89 ]
These structures are defined only if __USE_MISC is set in glibc net/if.h
headers, ie
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nicolas Dichtel
[ Upstream commit f0a3fdca794d1e68ae284ef4caefe681f7c18e89 ]
These structures are defined only if __USE_MISC is set in glibc net/if.h
headers, ie when _BSD_SOURCE or
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Chen Haiquan
[ Upstream commit ce577668a426c6a9e2470a09dcd07fbd6e45272a ]
When create a new vxlan link, example:
ip link add vtap mtu 1440 type vxlan vni 1 dev eth0
The argument "mtu" has
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Toshiaki Makita
[ Upstream commit 0b148def403153a4d1565f1640356cb78ce5109f ]
The missing br_vlan_should_use() test caused creation of an unneeded
local fdb entry
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Marek Vasut
[ Upstream commit 643d60bf575daaba93c1ac0d0e1c4b1d4ded1f75 ]
The memcpy() currently copies mdio_bus_data into new_bus->irq, which
makes no sense, since the
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Toshiaki Makita
[ Upstream commit 0b148def403153a4d1565f1640356cb78ce5109f ]
The missing br_vlan_should_use() test caused creation of an unneeded
local fdb entry on changing mac address of a
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Marek Vasut
[ Upstream commit 643d60bf575daaba93c1ac0d0e1c4b1d4ded1f75 ]
The memcpy() currently copies mdio_bus_data into new_bus->irq, which
makes no sense, since the mdio_bus_data structure
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jakub Sitnicki
[ Upstream commit 00bc0ef5880dc7b82f9c320dead4afaad48e47be ]
At present we perform an xfrm_lookup() for each UDPv6 message we
send. The lookup involves querying
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoffer Dall
commit fa89c77e891917b5913f9be080f9131a9457bb3e upstream.
When saving the state of the list registers, it is critical to
reset them zero, as we
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoffer Dall
commit fa89c77e891917b5913f9be080f9131a9457bb3e upstream.
When saving the state of the list registers, it is critical to
reset them zero, as we could otherwise leave
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jakub Sitnicki
[ Upstream commit 00bc0ef5880dc7b82f9c320dead4afaad48e47be ]
At present we perform an xfrm_lookup() for each UDPv6 message we
send. The lookup involves querying the flow cache
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christoffer Dall
commit 4d3afc9bad2b67b118a0cc204dc94703f7a44e74 upstream.
When saving the state of the list registers, it is critical to
reset them zero, as we
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Guillaume Nault
[ Upstream commit a5c5e2da8551eb69e5d5d09d51d526140b5db9fb ]
Unused fields of udp_cfg must be all zeros. Otherwise
setup_udp_tunnel_sock() fills
401 - 500 of 2190 matches
Mail list logo