Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Paul Mackerras
Linus Torvalds writes: > There's another side to "drumming your own drum": it is often seen as > actively offensive to some people who don't want to do the same thing. I agree. What usually seems to end up happening is that someone writes 95% and gets no credit, someone else does 5% and puts

Re: Patch(2.4.5): Fix PCMCIA ATA/IDE freeze (w/ PCI add-in cards)V3

2001-06-28 Thread Andre Hedrick
That is a legacy bit from ATA-2 but it is one of those things you can not get rid of :-( even thou things are obsoleted, they are not retired. This means that you have to go back into the past to see how it was used, silly! I hope you agree to that point. This is the drive->ctrl register

Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG with 2.4.5

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Timmerman
> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> Tim Timmerman wrote: >> >> > "kees" == kees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> kees> Hi, >> kees> I tried 2.4.5 but after a couple of hours I lost all network kees> connectivety. The log shows: >> >> Can I just add a me

Re: [Re: gcc: internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11]

2001-06-28 Thread Blesson Paul
"This is almost always the result of flakiness in your hardware - either RAM (most likely), or motherboard (less likely). " I cannot understand this. There are many other stuffs that I compiled with gcc without any problem. Again

gcc: internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11

2001-06-28 Thread Blesson Paul
hi I am trying to compile the kernel2.4.5 source code. Presently I have kernel2.2.14 and Redhat6.2. I have egcs1.2.2. Now when I compile I will get the following error gcc: Internel compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 make Error 1 Leaving directory ...

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread Yaacov Akiba Slama
Steve Lord wrote: >>Hi, >> > >>So I only hope that the smart guys at SGI find a way to prepare the >>patches the way Linus loves because now the file >>"patch-2.4.5-xfs-1.0.1-core" (which contains the modifs to the kernel >>and not the new files) is about 174090 bytes which is a lot. >> >>YA

Re: artificial latency for a network interface

2001-06-28 Thread Burkhard Daniel
I had a similiar problem once, and wrote a module that overwrote the loopback net device. Since it's loopback, the kernel won't care about headers. Yeah, I know: Quick & Dirty. I made the new loopback put its packets in a queue and then deliver them after a (adjustable) delay. If I can still

ac20, ac21 make config error

2001-06-28 Thread robs
in "linux/drivers/net/Config.in" line 30 used to be: if [ "$CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET" = "y" ]; then It seems to have been deleted. Putting it back, everything goes as it should. :) Thanks!! Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: artificial latency for a network interface

2001-06-28 Thread Andrew Morton
Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > to simulate a sattelite link, I need to add a latency to a > network connection. > > What is the easiest and best way to do that? > > I wanted to do that using two tun devices. > I had hoped to have a routing like this: > > <-> eth0 <-> tun0 <-> userspace, waiting

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac21

2001-06-28 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 29. Juni 2001 03:59 schrieb Dieter Nützel: > Hello Alan, > > you've missed the CONFIG_DRM_AGP thing. > Some other config objects (Input -> joysticks , SMB file system) are > broken, too. Keith Owens patch fixed it of course.

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Ian Stirling
> > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the > > only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody thinks > > they install a new kernel, and forgets to run "lilo" or something. But > > even that information you really get

Problem with Via VT82C686A

2001-06-28 Thread mythos
I have installed a second hard drive in my system in the second channel of my controller.But when I try to enable DMA I get: hdc: DMA disabled hdc: timeout waiting for DMA ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 hdc: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete

RE: PROBLEM:Illegal instruction when mount nfs file systems using

2001-06-28 Thread Frank Zhu (Shanghai)
ok. i just do another test.maybe meaningful. 1)no matter i select -march=i686 or -march=i386 the result are the same. 2)the server 192.168.0.254 (netboot) ,client 192.168.0.3 there are /usr ,/usr/local/ ,/home, /lib, /bin ... on the server on the client A: mount -t nfs netboot:/usr /usr

Re: Linux and system area networks

2001-06-28 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > We seem to have come full circle. My original question was about > providing a better way for sockets applications to take advantage of > SAN hardware. W2K Datacenter introduces "Winsock Direct," which will > bypass the protocol stack when

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Hacksaw
Given that seeing as much as possible on a potentially small screen would be good, maybe tighter would be nice. In example: kswapd:v1.8 ptyDevices: 256 Unix98 ptys configured serial:v5.05b (2001-05-03) with Options: MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI Devices:

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac21

2001-06-28 Thread Dieter Nützel
Hello Alan, you've missed the CONFIG_DRM_AGP thing. Some other config objects (Input -> joysticks , SMB file system) are broken, too. Regards, Dieter can't read "CONFIG_DRM_AGP": no such variable while executing "list $CONFIG_DRM_AGP" (procedure "writeconfig" line 2352)

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac21

2001-06-28 Thread Garett Spencley
> 2.4.5-ac21 > o Fix pnpbios compile failure and add docking (me) > station hotplug (/sbin/hotplug dock) gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2

artificial latency for a network interface

2001-06-28 Thread David McWherter
I once solved this problem using the QoS qdisc facilites: http://edge.mcs.drexel.edu/GICL/people/udmcwher/dnt/DNT.html It works on 2.2 kernels as well. -david Andreas Schuldei writes: > to simulate a sattelite link, I need to add a latency to a > network connection. > > What is the

[Q] mmap/munmap of physical address

2001-06-28 Thread Christophe Beaumont
Hi, I am fighting with a little problem here. I have reserved a chunk of physical memory for my personnal use and out of the kernel scope (linux mem=1024M). I have now to handle this reserved memory by myself with a simple scheme (I need BIG contiguous memory chunks (over 64Megs, and only few of

Configure and compile errors in 2.4.5ac20 and 1.4.5ac21

2001-06-28 Thread Ignacio Monge
Output ver_linux: Gnu C 2.96 Gnu make 3.79.1 binutils 2.11.90.0.8 util-linux 2.11e mount 2.11e modutils 2.4.6 e2fsprogs 1.21 reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j PPP2.4.1 Linux C

Configure and compile errors in 2.4.5ac20 and 2.4.5ac21

2001-06-28 Thread Ignacio Monge
Output ver_linux: Gnu C 2.96 Gnu make 3.79.1 binutils 2.11.90.0.8 util-linux 2.11e mount 2.11e modutils 2.4.6 e2fsprogs 1.21 reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j PPP2.4.1 Linux C

RE: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread A. Melon
Linus Torvalds hath spoken: > I don't _have_ any instances of my name being printed out to annoy the > user, so that's a very theoretical argument. There is, of course, only one way to be fair about this. And that is to apply this patch to init/main.c: 518a519 > printk("Linux is a

Linux 2.4.5-ac21

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org This is the initial merge with 2.4.6pre - treat this one with care, it may not be the most reliable 2.4.5ac release ever made

_syscall4, wake_up_interruptible(), and PID table questions

2001-06-28 Thread Khyron
Alright, since my last e-mail generated no interest, I thought I'd refine my queries: 1. wake_up_interruptible() I am reading http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/reports/accept.html and the my question is what solution to the "thundering herd" problem was eventually chosen and

Re: 2.4.5-ac20, make menuconfig problem

2001-06-28 Thread Dan Podeanu
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, f5ibh wrote: > make[4]: Entre dans le répertoire > `/usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.5-ac20/drivers/pnp' > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.5-ac20/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread Luigi Genoni
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, james rich wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote: > > > > > So it seems that even if JFS is less complete than XFS (no ACL, quotas > > > for instance), and even if it is less robust (I don't know if it is, I >

Re: RFC: Changes for PCI

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
"Khachaturov, Vassilii" wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > However, I think the driver (only going by your > description) would be > > more correct to use a pointer to struct pci_dev. We have a > token in the > > kernel that is guaranteed 100% unique to any given PCI

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread james rich
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote: > > > So it seems that even if JFS is less complete than XFS (no ACL, quotas > > for instance), and even if it is less robust (I don't know if it is, I > It is not less complete nor less robust, it's a

RE: RFC: Changes for PCI

2001-06-28 Thread Khachaturov, Vassilii
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > However, I think the driver (only going by your description) would be > more correct to use a pointer to struct pci_dev. We have a token in the > kernel that is guaranteed 100% unique to any given PCI device: the > pointer to its struct pci_dev. Is

Re: AGP Question

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> 4002b000-4002c000 rw-s ec681000 03:01 181386 /dev/mem > 4002c000-4002d000 rw-s 4000 03:01 185562 /dev/nvidia0 I'd suggest you talk to your proprietary driver and application provider. Who knows what their driver does - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: PROBLEM:Illegal instruction when mount nfs file systems using

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> Here I have to disagree with you Alan. When you pass "-march=i686" to > gcc, you are _not_ saying "generate code for a CPUID family 6 CPU". > "-march=i686" actually means "target an Intel P6 family chip, given > what we currently know about them". The gcc info pages don't talk Which is fine.

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread Luigi Genoni
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote: > Hi, > From what I understand from Linus's mail to lkml, there is a difference > between JFS and XFS: > JFS doesn't require any modifications to existing code, its only an > addition. > XFS on the contrary is far more intrusive. > So it seems

Re: Is an outside module supposed to use page cache?

2001-06-28 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:16, Ho Chak Hung wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to develop a module that makes use of the page cache(by > allocating a LOT of pages use page_cache_alloc and then add_to_page_cache). > However, I got some unresolved symbols error during insmod.(because the > symbols related

Re: PROBLEM:Illegal instruction when mount nfs file systems using

2001-06-28 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:42:09 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox wrote: >> > Intel specifically state that you cannot use CMOV without checking >> > for it. Its actually a gcc/binutils tool bug. The CPU is right. >> >> How is that a gcc bug? You tell the compiler to generate cmov, you run >> it on a CPU

AGP Question

2001-06-28 Thread Alan
It there a way to limit how much memory is allocatable by the AGPGART code? The reason I am asking is I am seeing some odd behaviour that I suspect is related to that code. When I boot the machine, it says something like "200 megs maximum available for AGP memory. X seems to grab 3/4 of that

Re: VM Requirement Document - v0.0

2001-06-28 Thread John Fremlin
[...] > immediate: RAM, on-chip cache, etc. > fast: Flash reads, ROMs, etc. > medium:Hard drives, CD-ROMs, 100Mb ethernet, etc. > slow: Flash writes, floppy disks, CD-WR burners > packeted: Reads/write should be in as large a packet as possible >

artificial latency for a network interface

2001-06-28 Thread Andreas Schuldei
to simulate a sattelite link, I need to add a latency to a network connection. What is the easiest and best way to do that? I wanted to do that using two tun devices. I had hoped to have a routing like this: <-> eth0 <-> tun0 <-> userspace, waiting queue <-> tun1 <-> eth1 I need to do it

Re: PROBLEM: kernel bug at page_alloc.c:81

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> 1 After a 'shutdown -h now', I get a kernel bug at page_alloc.c:81 > 2 After being in X (only happens after being in X), I get out of X, and as root >I do a 'shutdown -h now'. It goes through the shutdown process normally, and then >after it prints "Syncing hardware clock to system

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28.06.01 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > > > > The later line is not something of interest to most people, and if it > > happens to be they can research it rather than being

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds) wrote on 28.06.01 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > I agree the messages can be ugly. But they don't do any harm either, and > > sometimes they're useful. > > I consider them harmful when I start getting annoying

PROBLEM: kernel bug at page_alloc.c:81

2001-06-28 Thread khan_55
1 After a 'shutdown -h now', I get a kernel bug at page_alloc.c:81 2 After being in X (only happens after being in X), I get out of X, and as root I do a 'shutdown -h now'. It goes through the shutdown process normally, and then after it prints "Syncing hardware clock to system

Re: VIA 686B/Data Corruption

2001-06-28 Thread Jussi Laako
"Ryan W. Maple" wrote: > > I remember hearing something about Red Hat disabling UDMA on VIA chips > across the board. Maybe that has something to do with it? Dunno, if the kernel lies. There are four HDs on Promise and one HD and one CDROM on VIA. This is from currently running 2.4.2-2:

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 20010628 Troy Benjegerdes wrote: >> > >> > > usb-uhci.c: v1.251 Georg Acher, Deti Fliegl, Thomas Sailer, >> > Roman Weissgaerber >> > > usb-uhci.c: USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver >> > >> > How about "usb-u

Re: BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:35:14PM -0400, Ryan W. Maple wrote: > Check out: http://bugs.debian.org/85478 > > "When klogd's LogLine() function encounters a null byte in state >PARSING_TEXT, it will loop infinitely. More precisely, copyin() >will treat the null byte as a delimiter -

Re: VIA 686B/Data Corruption

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> > Interesting. They should be the same code for the VIA driver. > > I remember hearing something about Red Hat disabling UDMA on VIA chips > across the board. Maybe that has something to do with it? The RH 7.1 kernel disables VIA UDMA if the board has a DMI string indiciating its a KT7 or

Re: Linux and system area networks

2001-06-28 Thread Roland Dreier
Pekka> If you used sockets, I believe the normal way to use SAN Pekka> boards is to just make them look like network cards with a Pekka> large MTU Sure it works, but it's not very efficient :) (I Pekka> have to admit I've not played with that kind of toys at Pekka> all,

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Olaf Hering wrote: > kde.o. 2.5? Good idea! Graphics needs to be in the kernel to be fast. Windows proved that. -- Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse. Building 1024| MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Olaf Hering
On Thu, Jun 28, Jeff Garzik wrote: > John R Lenton wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:25:33PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > > KERN_BANNER > > > > cool, what about kbannerd ? > > > I'm still pushing for a Perl interpreter in the kernel, let's not forget > that too. kde.o.

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread Steve Lord
> Hi, > So I only hope that the smart guys at SGI find a way to prepare the > patches the way Linus loves because now the file > "patch-2.4.5-xfs-1.0.1-core" (which contains the modifs to the kernel > and not the new files) is about 174090 bytes which is a lot. > > YA > But that is not a

Re: VIA 686B/Data Corruption

2001-06-28 Thread Ryan W. Maple
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Just tested RedHat's 2.4.3-12 and 2.4.5-ac19 on A7V133 mobo. RedHat's kernel > > seems to work without lockups, but 2.4.5-ac19 doesn't (locks up at boot, > > compiled w/o athlon optimization and ACPI), so no changes on that. > > Interesting. They should

Re: BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread Ryan W. Maple
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Guyett wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Some versions of the 3c59x driver emit a NUL character on bootup which makes > > klogd suck CPU. This is fixed in 2.4.5, dunno about 2.4.4. > > sysklogd 1.4.1 changelog lists a no busyloop fix. Check

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
John R Lenton wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:25:33PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > KERN_BANNER > > cool, what about kbannerd ? I'm still pushing for a Perl interpreter in the kernel, let's not forget that too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread John R Lenton
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:25:33PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > KERN_BANNER cool, what about kbannerd ? -- John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune: A longo prazo, estaremos todos mortos. -- John Maynard Keynes PGP signature

Re: VIA 686B/Data Corruption

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> Just tested RedHat's 2.4.3-12 and 2.4.5-ac19 on A7V133 mobo. RedHat's kernel > seems to work without lockups, but 2.4.5-ac19 doesn't (locks up at boot, > compiled w/o athlon optimization and ACPI), so no changes on that. Interesting. They should be the same code for the VIA driver. > 2.4.3-12

Re: VIA 686B/Data Corruption

2001-06-28 Thread Jussi Laako
A little test report follows... Just tested RedHat's 2.4.3-12 and 2.4.5-ac19 on A7V133 mobo. RedHat's kernel seems to work without lockups, but 2.4.5-ac19 doesn't (locks up at boot, compiled w/o athlon optimization and ACPI), so no changes on that. 2.4.3-12 also correctly detects cable

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> JFS doesn't require any modifications to existing code, its only an > addition. It depends how clean the interface is. It is possible to avoid changing core code by writing your own clone of it - that isnt good and doesnt make people happy sometimes. > XFS on the contrary is far more

Re: RFC: Changes for PCI

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tom Gall wrote: > Gérard Roudier wrote: > > The driver checks against PCI bus+dev+func in 2 situations: > > > > 1) To apply the boot order that user can set up in the controller NVRAMs. > > 2) To detect buggy double reporting of the same device by the kernel PCI > >code (this made lot of

Re: Tvmixer Oops

2001-06-28 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Gerd Knorr wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Attached is the trace of an oops which seems to be caused by the > > tvmixer code. Tvmixer is compiled monolithically into the kernel, > > the rest of bttv is compiled as modules. > >

Re: BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread Justin Guyett
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Some versions of the 3c59x driver emit a NUL character on bootup which makes > klogd suck CPU. This is fixed in 2.4.5, dunno about 2.4.4. sysklogd 1.4.1 changelog lists a no busyloop fix. justin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Microsoft and Xenix.

2001-06-28 Thread Thomas Dodd
Kai Henningsen wrote: > No. GEM, I believe, originally came from CP/M. Most popular as the > windowing system of the Atari ST; given that someone did a quick-hack MS- > DOS clone to support it on the 68K, it seems fairly obvious that by that > time, it had already been ported to MS-DOS. (GEM-DOS

Re: RFC: Changes for PCI

2001-06-28 Thread Tom Gall
Gérard Roudier wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Tom Gall wrote: > > > Well you have device drivers like the symbios scsi driver for instance that > > > tries to determine if it's seen a card before. It does this by looking at the > > > bus,dev etc numbers... It's quite

Re: Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.0.0 available

2001-06-28 Thread Yaacov Akiba Slama
Hi, From what I understand from Linus's mail to lkml, there is a difference between JFS and XFS: JFS doesn't require any modifications to existing code, its only an addition. XFS on the contrary is far more intrusive. So it seems that even if JFS is less complete than XFS (no ACL, quotas for

Re: RFC: Changes for PCI

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Gérard Roudier wrote: > The driver checks against PCI bus+dev+func in 2 situations: > > 1) To apply the boot order that user can set up in the controller NVRAMs. > 2) To detect buggy double reporting of the same device by the kernel PCI >code (this made lot of troubles at some time). Cool.

Re: BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:49:46PM -, james bond wrote: > 1-systeme hangs when i try ton compile anything > > i've compiled the kernel 2.4.4 , once i finish and boot the first time on > 2.4.4 everything goses ok , > only too problemes > 1st- klogd takes 100% CPU time Some versions of

Re: RFC: Changes for PCI

2001-06-28 Thread Gérard Roudier
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Tom Gall wrote: > > Well you have device drivers like the symbios scsi driver for instance that > > tries to determine if it's seen a card before. It does this by looking at the > > bus,dev etc numbers... It's quite reasonable for two different scsi

Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of >the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course). > > I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, >Sound

2.4.5-ac20, make menuconfig problem

2001-06-28 Thread f5ibh
Hi Alan and others, I'm trying to build 2.4.5-ac20, I get the following error when entering the submenu "Ethernet (10 or 100Mbit) --->" of "[*] Network device support" Menuconfig has encountered a possible error in one of the kernel's configuration files and is unable to continue. Here is

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Craig Milo Rogers
>Print all copyright, config, etc. as KERN_DEBUG. How about a new level, say "KERN_CONFIG", with a "show-config" parameter to enable displaying KERN_CONFIG messages? Craig Milo Rogers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: A signal fairy tale

2001-06-28 Thread Daniel R. Kegel
Jamie wrote: > Daniel R. Kegel wrote: > > Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jamie Lokier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Btw, this functionality is already available using sigaction(). Just > > > > search for a signal whose handler is SIG_DFL. If you then block that > > > >

Re: TCP/IP stack

2001-06-28 Thread Matti Aarnio
Richard, should there be (is there?) linux-networking-faq, or can this be put into the linux-kernel faq ? On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:33:46AM -0400, Michael J Clark wrote: > hey guys, > > I have been reading through TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 2 and the linux > source. That book describes

Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Moore
> Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using > PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly. > > Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would "solve" the problem. Another > solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two

Re: PROBLEM:Illegal instruction when mount nfs file systems using

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> > Intel specifically state that you cannot use CMOV without checking > > for it. Its actually a gcc/binutils tool bug. The CPU is right. > > How is that a gcc bug? You tell the compiler to generate cmov, you run > it on a CPU that doesn't have it, you get what you deserve. There's > really

Re: Asus CUV4X-DLS

2001-06-28 Thread J. Nick Koston
It seems to be ok with 2.4.5-ac19, so I guess I'll just wait for 2.4.6 and hope that resolves it for good. Nick On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 08:27:17AM -0400, John Cavan wrote: > Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:26:20 -0400 > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linus Torvalds wrote: > Especially as "dmesg" will output even the debugging messages > that do not actually end up being printed on the screen unless explicitly > asked for. Nifty, I did not know that. Makes all kinds of sense, though. Silly me... > I'd also like to acknowledge the fact

Re: BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread Ryan W. Maple
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > i've compiled the kernel 2.4.4 , once i finish and boot the first time on > > 2.4.4 everything goses ok , > > only too problemes > > 1st- klogd takes 100% CPU time > > Old old versions of klogd had bugs where they would do that. If there is > a

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Gerhard Mack wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the > > > only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody thinks > > > they install a new kernel, and forgets

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > As Alan said, driver versions are incredibly useful. People use update > their drivers over top of kernel drivers all the time. Vendors do it > too. "Run dmesg and e-mail me the output" is 1000 times more simple for > end users. Fair enough.

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the > > only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody thinks > > they install a new kernel, and forgets to run "lilo" or something. But > >

bzImage > 0xefff0 will not boot from floppy

2001-06-28 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! ...it will loop forever. I have fix that allows up-to 0x0 bzImages, but it is *ugly*. This seems better; please apply. Pavel Index: build.c === RCS file:

Re: Linux and system area networks

2001-06-28 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:28:20PM +0200, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand your reference to MPI here. MPI is a > high-level API; MPI can run on top of whatever communication features > exists: TCP/IP, shared memory, VI,

Re: [PATCH 2.4.5-ac12] New Sony Vaio Motion Eye camera driver

2001-06-28 Thread volodya
Sorry for replying a couple of weeks late - I don't check linux-kernel that often. On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Stelian Pop wrote: > > I got just the YUV code from Gatos, and a few months ago it took less than > > an hour to merge just that part (and most of that was compiling and > > testing). > >

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Dan Podeanu
Ok, my two cents. Print all copyright, config, etc. as KERN_DEBUG. Then use a 'verbose' or similar parameter to lilo/kernel to enable console printing of KERN_DEBUG, to be used when the system fails to boot, etc. Dan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread Alan Cox
> i've compiled the kernel 2.4.4 , once i finish and boot the first time on > 2.4.4 everything goses ok , > only too problemes > 1st- klogd takes 100% CPU time Old old versions of klogd had bugs where they would do that. If there is a continuous problem it may also do so - does 'dmesg' show

Re: [PATCH] Bug in 2.4.5 in proc_pid_make_inode ()

2001-06-28 Thread Alexander Viro
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Martin Wilck wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently experienced a number of kernel OOPSes > in "top" under heavy load. Kernel is 2.4.5 (IA64, but > this has nothing to do the IA64 patch). > > The OOPS happens in the call tree > > open () system call > [...] > real_lookup () >

Re: [PATCH] Bug in 2.4.5 in proc_pid_make_inode ()

2001-06-28 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Martin Wilck wrote: >I have recently experienced a number of kernel OOPSes >in "top" under heavy load. Kernel is 2.4.5 (IA64, but >this has nothing to do the IA64 patch). Same here; I just debugged these on S/390 ... >I have seen 2.4.6-pre6 contains changes to this subroutine as well, >but

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linus Torvalds wrote: > Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the > only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody thinks > they install a new kernel, and forgets to run "lilo" or something. But > even that information you really get from a simple

RE: PATCH: cciss small pci id table patch

2001-06-28 Thread White, Charles
Yes, I agree... pci.txt says it should end in a zero.. I will include that change in my future updates as well... -Original Message- From: Marcus Meissner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:34 AM

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Tommy Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was pleased to say: > > > >> If they are shut off, then where's the drumming? Because if people start > >> making copyright printk's normal, I will

BIG PROBLEM

2001-06-28 Thread james bond
1-systeme hangs when i try ton compile anything i've compiled the kernel 2.4.4 , once i finish and boot the first time on 2.4.4 everything goses ok , only too problemes 1st- klogd takes 100% CPU time 2nd- cat /proc/cpuinf --guives me too CPU'S without putin any info about the CPU 1 like

[PATCH] Config variable scripts

2001-06-28 Thread Riley Williams
Hi Alan. The enclosed patch was originally developed for the ELKS kernel, but will apply equally well against any Linux kernel as it only adds new scripts to the scripts subdirectory. The new scripts are as follows: 1. renvar Renames configuration variables in all files

Re: PROBLEM:Illegal instruction when mount nfs file systems usingcyr ixIII

2001-06-28 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > The problem is that VIA Cyrix III announces itself (via CPUID) > > as a "family 6" processor, i.e. i686 compatible. This is not > > completely accurate, since it doesn't implement the conditional > > move instruction. [Yeah, I know there's a CPUID feature

kernel 2.4.5 Ooops

2001-06-28 Thread Ted Gervais
I am getting an Oops/kernel panic with kernel 2.4.5. Here is what the panic notice says in part: The panic notice said: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 846ea4e6 *pde = 0 Oops: 0 0 0 0 cpu: 0 EIP: 0010:[] EFLAGS: 00010286 Process ax25ipd (pid:270,stackpage=c54a700) call

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tommy Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was pleased to say: > >> If they are shut off, then where's the drumming? Because if people start >> making copyright printk's normal, I will make "quiet" the default. > >Amen. This is

[PATCH] Bug in 2.4.5 in proc_pid_make_inode ()

2001-06-28 Thread Martin Wilck
Hi, I have recently experienced a number of kernel OOPSes in "top" under heavy load. Kernel is 2.4.5 (IA64, but this has nothing to do the IA64 patch). The OOPS happens in the call tree open () system call [...] real_lookup () proc_base_lookup () proc_pid_make_inode () iput ()

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:18:24PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the > > only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody > > thinks they install a new kernel, and forgets to

Re: [PATCH] User chroot

2001-06-28 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Sean Hunter writes: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:55:56PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> ln /dev/zero /tmp/zero >> ln /dev/hda ~/hda >> ln /dev/mem /var/tmp/README > > None of these (of course) work if you use mount options to > restrict device nodes on those filesystems. In which case, you

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Christoph Zens
> Also, in printk's, you waste run-time memory, and you bloat up the need > for the log size. Both of which are _technical_ reasons not to do it. > > Small is beuatiful. I totally agree. If you want to use Linux for a small and low cost embedded system, you can't afford loads of RAM and FLASH

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Tommy Reynolds
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was pleased to say: > If they are shut off, then where's the drumming? Because if people start > making copyright printk's normal, I will make "quiet" the default. Amen. This is like editing a program to remove the "harmless" compiler warning messages. If I

Is an outside module supposed to use page cache?

2001-06-28 Thread Ho Chak Hung
Hi, I am trying to develop a module that makes use of the page cache(by allocating a LOT of pages use page_cache_alloc and then add_to_page_cache). However, I got some unresolved symbols error during insmod.(because the symbols related to lru_cache_add etc are not exported?) . I am just

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I consider them harmful when I start getting annoying patches that > start adding more and more of them. > Which is how this whole thread started. Sort of. The point of the patch which started this thread was as a wake-up call to a company who had taken the code,

  1   2   3   4   5   >