Re: bug of Nvidia (0.9.5) Drivers in 2.4 Kernel Enviroment

2001-01-05 Thread Cefiar
will probably fail on any other version of the kernel. Of note: Nvidia have a new driver in the works, that should be much nicer re: kernel interface. -- -=[ Stuart Young (Aka Cefiar) ]=--- | http://amarok.glasswings.com.au/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ---

bind() - Old/Current behaviour - Change?

2000-10-19 Thread Cefiar
ily implemented (doesn't sound that easy, but then, not much with the kernel does). However I think the idea is sound, and could at least do with some consideration. Anyway, enough of my bantering.. time for everyone to comment. -- -=[ Stuart Young (Aka Cefiar) ]

Re: bind() - Old/Current behaviour - Change?

2000-10-20 Thread Cefiar
At 03:02 PM 20/10/00 +0800, Andrey Savochkin wrote: >On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:52:30PM +1000, Cefiar wrote: >[snip] > > ... what is really necessary, > > which is to simply not allow the programs to bind to the addresses in the > > first place. Unfortunately to impleme

Re: about /proc/meminfo and mmap

2000-10-20 Thread Cefiar
memory again. Maximum I've seen a board allow for local video ram is 8 Meg, which is pretty much the amount you are missing. The board in question was a Socket 7 board with embedded video. -- -=[ Stuart Young (Aka Cefiar) ]=--- | http://amarok.glasswings.com.a