n policy insertion, the policy were inserted
depending on the accuracy of the mark (the more the mask is specific, the more
the mark must be put at the beginning of the list), how would we decide which
is the more specific between these ones ?
ip -6 xfrm policy add src fd00::1/128 dst fd00::2/1
Le 6 févr. 2013 à 15:30, Jamal Hadi Salim a écrit :
> On 13-02-06 08:53 AM, Emmanuel Thierry wrote:
>> Actually, we didn't think about this problem since we work with priorities,
>> putting the default policy (without a mark) at a minor priority than the
>> marked on
Hello,
Le 7 févr. 2013 à 11:49, Steffen Klassert a
écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:53:48PM +0100, Emmanuel Thierry wrote:
>>
>> Le 6 févr. 2013 à 14:14, jamal a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On 13-02-05 03:12 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>>>>
Le 7 févr. 2013 à 12:08, Emmanuel Thierry
a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Le 7 févr. 2013 à 11:49, Steffen Klassert a
> écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:53:48PM +0100, Emmanuel Thierry wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 6 févr. 2013 à 14:14, jamal a écrit :
>&g
Hello,
Le 7 févr. 2013 à 13:54, Steffen Klassert a
écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 12:08:22PM +0100, Emmanuel Thierry wrote:
>>
>> This is a nice idea, however you keep the insertion asymmetric. The usage of
>> xfrm marks in non-conflicting cases will be made p
5 matches
Mail list logo
