Re: howto boost write(2) performance?

2007-10-09 Thread Gustavo Chain
El Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:50:17 +0200 Michael Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi list, > > i'm developing an application (in C) which needs to write about > 1Gbit/s (125Mb/s) to a disk array attached via U320 SCSI. > It runs on Dual Core 2 Xeons @2Ghz utilizing kernel 2.6.22.7. > > I buf

[PATCH] Reserve N process to root

2007-10-09 Thread Gustavo Chain
I think it's necessary to reserve some pids to the super user. 5 must be sufficient. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Chain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/fork.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 33f12f4..db23cb3 1

Re: [PATCH] Reserve N process to root

2007-10-09 Thread Gustavo Chain
El Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:19:27 +0930 David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Gustavo Chain wrote: > > I think it's necessary to reserve some pids to the super user. > > 5 must be sufficient. > > Why? (Sorry if I missed something.) To prevent a posible Do

Re: [PATCH] Reserve N process to root

2007-10-10 Thread Gustavo Chain
El Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:14:06 +0930 David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Gustavo Chain wrote: > > El Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:19:27 +0930 > > David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > >> Gustavo Chain wrote: > >> > >>>

Re: Getting problem while building kernel module

2007-10-11 Thread Gustavo Chain
El Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:53:41 +0100 (BST) mahamuni ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi all, > I am trying to build the following module and getting > below specified error.please help me for successful > compilation > here is my code(ins.c) > -- > #include > #include

Re: [PATCH] Reserve N process to root

2007-10-12 Thread Gustavo Chain
El Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:29:10 +0300 Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Kyle Moffett wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2007, at 01:37:23, Al Boldi wrote: > > > You have a point, and resource-controllers can probably control > > > DoS a lot better, but the they also incur more overhead. Think > > > of thi