On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:30:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:42:25PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On 04/23/2015 01:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > The binder developers at Samsung have stated that the implementation we
> > > have here works for their
Default limits are quite low even for today's embedded hardware.
Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski
---
net/Kconfig | 1 +
net/core/Kconfig | 7 +++
net/core/sock.c | 5 ++---
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 net/core/Kconfig
diff --git
ginally defined here
struct usb_functionfs_descs_head {
^
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz
Cc: Felipe Balbi
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski
---
include/uapi/linux/usb/functionfs.h | 10 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:58:53PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
OP here.
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:04:44PM +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> > Applicable for 3.14-stable only.
> >
> > This commit drops duplicate declaration of struct usb_functionfs_descs_head
>
.com/lmctl/linux/commits/kdbus-lsm-v4.for-systemd-v212
[2]
https://github.com/lmctl/kdbus/commit/aa0885489d19be92fa41c6f0a71df28763228a40
May I ask if you guys have your own plan for LSM or maybe it would be
worth to resurrect [1]?
Cheers,
--
Karol Lewandowski, Samsung R&D Institute Poland
n for LSM or maybe it would be
worth to resurrect [1]?
Cheers,
--
Karol Lewandowski, Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
On 2014-10-30 15:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:44:39AM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
>> [ Sorry for breaking thread and resend - gmane rejected my original message
>> due to too long list of recipients... ]
>>
>> On 2014-10-30 00:4
ea.
>>
>> Parsing data is out of question, of course, but this is not what we were
>> proposing.
>
> Why is it out of the question. If it's a socket you can just a BPF filter
> on it, so why can't kdbus support similar basic functionality ?
Fair point. I thi
On 2014-10-30 21:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 08:55:56PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
>> On 2014-10-30 15:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:44:39AM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
>>>> [ Sorry for breaking thre
On 2014-10-31 00:39, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 08:55:56 PM Karol Lewandowski wrote:
>> On 2014-10-30 15:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> Other than that, I don't know exactly what your patches do, or why they
>>> are needed, care to g
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:01:20AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> > This is set of EXPERIMENTAL patches adding lsm support to kdbus.
> > (Rebased on top of v3.17.)
> >
> > >From least to most invasive:
content might be interesting and helpful).
This is just one of many possible scenarios.
> It might be harder to get the important messages on the console when
> the system is going down.
Messages from additional buffers are not intended to be written to console.
> It will be harder to
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:36:33PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski
> ---
> drivers/misc/kdbus/bus.h| 2 ++
> drivers/misc/kdbus/connection.h | 2 ++
> drivers/misc/kdbus/domain.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
&
13 matches
Mail list logo
