> > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.2/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> > % /usr/bin/gcc -Wall -O2 -o bug bug.c; ./bug
> > 0x8480
> > % /usr/gcc/aeb/bin/gcc -v
> > Reading specs from
/usr/gcc/aeb/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/specs
> > gcc versio
- Original Message -
From: "Steven N. Hirsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Phantom PS/2 mouse persists..
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrot
Wasn't the original complaint that the kernel headers use C++ keyword
and thus prevent the writing of, at least some, modules in C++. I have
written C++ code before that was as least as fast as comparable C code and
more efficient in some ways. Whether this could be or not be reproduced in
k
OK I've decided to give this a shot, IF there is sufficient interest out
there for C++ safe headers. So all you coders out there who have tried and
failed or who wish to program kernel modules in C++ join in and help out by
listing the errors you have encountered with the current header setup
Hi all,
I'm looking through the suggestions and stuff that I have gotten so far.
As for the extern "C" stuff I'm torn between fixing the headers internally
or making side-by-side header files for C++ users. Such as:
a.h exists. So I create a a.hpp which contains somthing like the following
Hi all,
After a delay on some other project I've again started up the process of
fixing up the Linux headers, i.e. removing the use of C++ keywords as
variable and stuff. I have questions on the use of three datastructures
which happen to use the C++ keyword new but first a couple of things.
So which is the recommended compiler for each kernel version 2.2.x,
2.4.x(pre?) nowadays? I've pretty much kept gcc 2.7.2.3 around just for
compiling the kernel however now I hear you need egcs to compile 2.4? I
don't mind keeping 2.7.2.3 around in its own installation directory just for
the pur
> > files in the kernel will all be happy in Linuxland. Can any external
>
> Why do you need to touch any existing kernel .c source file ? If you make
> that patch, this breaks "situation 1" above.
It doesn't break situation 1 as the minor changes I've made to those 2 C
files should not have
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux Kernel Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: Need info on the use of certain datastructures and the first
C++
Hi,
I was wondering if support for the HPT370 RAID capabilities is planned?
I found that with the IDE patch from Hedrick I was able to get regular EIDE
device support for this controller however I was hoping to use its RAID
capabilities. Is work on this being done? Thanks for any help.
-
T
Hi,
I was just wondering if there was some reason why the HPT370's RAID
capabilities weren't supported in the enhanced IDE patch for 2.2.*? Or if
support for its RAID capabilities were being worked on. I noticed FreeBSD
also appears to fail to support its RAID features so I am partially in
> No, actually the instability starts right after/when the root
> filesystem is mounted (it seems). I have no foreign modules installed
> when this error occurs. Even if I did, why would the Abit KA7 with the
> same [other] hardware and software NOT show this problem, even with all
> opts enab
12 matches
Mail list logo
