On 03.10.2012 13:05, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> 3.6 introduced link restrictions:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=800179c9b8a1e796e441674776d11cd4c05d61d7
>
> It sounds like you've got symlinks in a world-writable directory, and
> you're followin
On 06.10.2013 23:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Serge E. Hallyn" writes:
>
> So if we can feel safe just depending on the parent directory
> permissions (which are not hidden by a mount) protecting our mount
> points, I feel much better about this patchset.
As far as i can tell, the permissions
On 28.04.2013 17:56, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'm not sure if it is supported, but building with a O= -directory that
was previously used to build a 3.8.9-kernel that was "clean"ed (but not
"mrproper"ed) before building 3.9 results in a build-failure:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/xssd/usr
On 13.02.2013 09:28, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 12.02.2013 21:42, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > [..]
> > I think I see the issue. Your host controller reports the Inactive
> > state after a USB disconnect. My host controllers go to the RxDetect
> > state on a disconnect.
> >
> > The patches that wen
On 13.02.2013 11:33, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:16:56PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > On 13.02.2013 09:28, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > > On 12.02.2013 21:42, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > > [..]
> > > > There was a further
#include
I got a "Tyan Thunder HE-SL"-Mainboard today, which has a "Severworks
ServerSet III HE"-Chipset. (2xPIII 933, 2x512MB PC133 ECC-Registered
SDRAM)
And i have one problem and one question.
First the question. I have an uptime of phenomenal 29minutes and "cat
/proc/interrupts" tells me
> > Now my problem.
> >
> > The Graphic-Card is a Geforce 2, Xfree is 4.02 (compiled under 2.2.17).
> >
> > When i start X, everything is fine. When i go back to text-console and
> > wait "some time" and then switch back to X the computer locks solid and i
> > have to press the Big-Red Button. (
> You could try booting with 'nmi_watchdog=0' and see what happens.
Since i "append"ed it into the lilo-confi i haven't had a lockup. :-))
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Program
> > I found that when I compiled the 2.4 kernel with the option
> > of Pentium III or Pentium 4 on a Celeron's PC, it could cause the
> > system hang at very beginning boot stage, and I found the problem
> > is cause by the fact that Intel Celeron doesn't have a real memory
>
#include
I two Pioneer DVD U04S (SCSI) 10x DVD 40xCD. When i want to play CD-Rs
they are "loud". So i searched for a "slowdown" Programm on freshmeat and
fount "cdrom_speed.c". The problem is that the drive seems to ignore the
speed changes and spins the CDR with full speed.
Kernel is 2.2.17
#Include
After some days of uptime, i just stopped (nearly) all programs, unmounted
all unnecessary devices.
But top & free say that 1/3 of my RAM is still "used"
Here is what top means:
(Swap is 0K because i don't use Swap at all. Should i use swap?)
9:54pm up 11 days, 23 min, 4 users
#include
(Relevant) HW is:
MB: Serverworks HE-Chipset
RAM: 1GB
CPU: 2xPIII 933Mhz
"System"-HDD: 18GB Ultra 160SCSI
"Data"-HDD: 2xIBM DTLA 307045 plugged onto a "Promise Ultra 66"
Some "simple" steps to do that.
mount /dev/hde1 /x1
mount /dev/hdg1 /x2
(The two DTLAs)
rsync -av --delete /x1
> > now that -ac grows that huge, could you put out incremental patches?
>
> Takes me too much time. But if anyone else wants to, go ahead
This is what i use to diff 2 different kernels
- snip -
diffkernel)
mount none /d/kernel -t ramfs
cd /d/kernel
tar
#Include
I just bought one of $subject (PDC 20268)
Removed a Ultra 66 from my system and plugged the new one into the 66Mhz
PCI-Bus (Intependent from the 33Mhz PCI-Bus (Tyan Thunder HE-SL Mainboard
with Serverworks HE-SL-Chipset))
Kernel is 2.4.4 with Promise support compiled in. (The Ultra
> I just bought one of $subject (PDC 20268)
>
> Removed a Ultra 66 from my system and plugged the new one into the 66Mhz
> PCI-Bus (Intependent from the 33Mhz PCI-Bus (Tyan Thunder HE-SL Mainboard
> with Serverworks HE-SL-Chipset))
>
> Kernel is 2.4.4 with Promise support compiled in. (The Ultra
#Include
I have 3 SCSI-CD-Writers. "Strange" is that the boot-process only finds
the first one (1 0 5 0), the other two i have to add with
echo "scsi add-single-device 2 0 4 0" > /proc/scsi/scsi
echo "scsi add-single-device 2 0 6 0" > /proc/scsi/scsi
to make them useable.
Here is the comple
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 06:38:27PM +0200, Gérard Roudier wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
> > I have 3 SCSI-CD-Writers. "Strange" is that the boot-process only finds
> > the first one (1 0 5 0), the other two i have to add with
> &
Martin Wilck wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else) a
On 03.01.2008 02:16, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:35:03 Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > Currently i'm deleting about 500.000 files on a XFS-filesystem which
> > takes a few minutes, as i had a top open i saw th
On 05.01.2008 01:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:35:03 +0100 Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > Currently i'm deleting about 500.000 files on a XFS-filesystem which
> > takes a few minute
> > Don't use udev then. Good old static dev works fine if you have a fixed
> > set of devices.
>
> It doesn't, with the unpredictable SCSI mapping insanity.
That what LABEL und UUID-Support in mount is for.
You label the filesystems (e2label for ext2 and ext3) and use that label to
mount them
On 09.01.2008 09:56, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> On 2008-01-09 00:06 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > That what LABEL und UUID-Support in mount is for.
>
> That's udev shit. I don't want it.
No.
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what
On 09.01.2008 11:21, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On 09.01.2008 09:56, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> > On 2008-01-09 00:06 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > That what LABEL und UUID-Support in mount is for.
> >
> > That's udev shit. I don't wan
On 10.01.2008 12:30, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>>> Don't use udev then. Good old static dev works fine if you have a fixed
>>>> set of devices.
>>>>
>>> It doesn't, with the unpredictable SCSI mapping in
Hi
Currently i'm deleting about 500.000 files on a XFS-filesystem which
takes a few minutes, as i had a top open i saw that 'wa' is shown as
0.0% (Nothing else running currently) and everything except 'id' is near
the bottom too. Kernel is 2.6.23.11.
So, as 'rm -rf' is essentially a IO (or se
On 12.01.2008 18:10, TimC wrote:
> Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:41:17 +0100 (CET):
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:22:45PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> >
> > > > What can happen if someone does tune2fs -Lroot /dev/usbs
Hi
Yesterday i upgraded an 1 year old System from 4x1GB (32Bit, No
Memory-Remap) to 4x2GB (64Bit, Memory-Remap)
Today i due to a lucky coincidence i discovered that i have a memory
corruption problem.
This problem happens only with at least 4GB RAM and Memory-Remap. It
happens with any 2 of
On 16.12.2007 02:39, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> Hi
It appears i found my culprit. :-)
I have a ISDN-controller which is driven by the HFC-PCI-driver and it
appears to not be 64bit-safe.
I will test more thorough after i have relocated the card to another
computer.
Bis d
On 10.11.2007 13:01, Mark Lord wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>> ..
>> My computer/mainboard @work has such a "broken" BIOS. Of the 5 SATA-Ports
>> this MB has only 1 (and 1 "missing" that is reported by linux but i can't
>> find on
On 11.11.2007 15:05, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 10.11.2007 00:32, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > [...]
> > My computer/mainboard @work has such a "broken" BIOS. Of the 5
> > SATA-Ports this MB has only 1 (and 1 "missing" that is reported by
On 12.11.2007 17:18, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> On 2007-11-12, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Geeks like you and me want the latest software
> > (I'm using Debian unstable/testing).
> >
> > But most users want a Linux installation that simply works - and this
> > includes all software on
> > It's not very conservative to suddenly change default behavior and break
> > autofs mounts. There is not even one kernel message that "_tells_ user why
> > it thinks it's wrong". It just silently fails.
>
> No it doesn't. It reports an error code to the caller. If autofs is
> failing silently,
On 09.11.2007 12:04, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:46:22 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:29:37PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> > > And I might even privately patch my own kernels to map the ACHI BAR
> > > in the cases where the BIOS didn't...
>
On 09.11.2007 22:08, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>> And on the topic of "broken" BIOSes. I have a little empathy for the MB
>> manufactures as non-RAID AHCI royaly screws Windos, so not supporting it
>> reduces their support costs enou
On 09.11.2007 22:08, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>> And on the topic of "broken" BIOSes. I have a little empathy for the MB
>> manufactures as non-RAID AHCI royaly screws Windos, so not supporting it
>> reduces their support costs enou
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Stefan Richter wrote:
> On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
>>(Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button
>>next to "Help" in *config)
>
>
> Rhetorical question: What will this button be used for?
Having "all(tm)" information of something in one place?
Help-Text and Dependencies/Sele
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>
>> On 15 Jan, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>
Loye Young wrote:
>>Take for example the AT keyboard which is
>>one of the most common keyboards in the world. I have seen and
>>used it attached to a PC via parport, serial port and the standard
>>PS/2 port. So to handle cases like this the input layer created a
>>serio interface.
>
>
> If plai
Yakov Lerner wrote:
> On 2/14/07, sfaibish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:06:37 -0500, Sorin Faibish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Introducing DualFS
>> >
>> > File System developers played with the idea of separation of
>> > meta-data from data in file systems for a w
Martin A. Fink wrote:
> I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk.
> Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per second for
> a long period of time. So it is important for me that the harddisk drive is
> reliable in the sense of "if it is cap
Martin A. Fink wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 00:31 schrieben Sie:
>> Martin A. Fink wrote:
>>> I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk.
>>> Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per second
>>> for
>>> a long period of time. So it
Martin A. Fink wrote:
>> Also you have skipped the information how the images "arrive" on the system
> (PCI(e) card?), that may be important for an "end to end" view of the
> problem.
>
> Images arrive via Gigabit Ethernet. GigE Vision standard. (PCIe x4)
The the next question is: ChipSet/Used
Martin A. Fink wrote:
>> The needed total bandwidth may be to high and at least the incoming part via
> GigE may have serious overhead.
>> 150MB/s in via (at least 2) GigE, without Zero-Copy there is another 150MB/s
> memory to memory.
>> Then there is the next 150MB/s memory to the discs, withou
Hi
I'm using a Bunch auf HDDs in USB-Enclosures for storing files.
(currently 38 HDD, with a total capacity of 9,5 TB of which 8,5 TB is used)
After i realised about a year(!) ago that the files copied to the HDDs
sometimes aren't identical to the "original"-files i changed my
procedured so that
Robert Hancock wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> I'm using a Bunch auf HDDs in USB-Enclosures for storing files.
>> (currently 38 HDD, with a total capacity of 9,5 TB of which 8,5 TB is
>> used)
>
> All the same enclosur
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>
>>Hi
>>
>>
>>I'm using a Bunch auf HDDs in USB-Enclosures for storing files.
>>(currently 38 HDD, with a total capacity of 9,5 TB of which 8,5 TB is used)
>>
>>After
DervishD wrote:
> Hi Matthias :)
>
> * Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
>
>>My averate file size is about 1GB with files from about 400MB to
>>5000MB I estimate the average error-rate at about one damaged file in
>>about 10GB of data.
&
Robert Hancock wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Hmmm. That's the only thing that i currently may be doing wrong.
>> I have a 1,5 Meter and a 4,5 Meter cable connected to the USB-Controller
>> and i only use of them depending on where the HDD is placed in
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:41:12 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>I'm using a Bunch auf HDDs in USB-Enclosures for storing files.
>>>>(currently 38 HDD, with a total capacity of 9,5 TB of which
Stefan Richter wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>>Robert Hancock wrote:
>>
>>>Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have a 1,5 Meter and a 4,5 Meter cable connected to the USB-Controller
>>>>and i only use of them depending
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to support old 2.4 modules features in 2.6 kernel modules:-
> 1. no kernel source tree is required to build modules.
I don't think that is possible.
There are a few "questions" that are quite fundamental when you want to
build a module that can be loade
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
> this?).
The thought that crossed my mind was:
Why not do the same thing that was done to the "Help"-file. (Before it
was superseded by Kconfig).
Originaly there was a central Help-file, with all t
Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
>>> this?).
>>>
>>
>>
>> The thought tha
Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
authorit
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:56:52PM +0200, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>> I could see the point in ONE "HOWTO" file per language to get people
>> started, but everything else is a pointless exercise.
>> A developer/b
markus reichelt wrote:
PS: Just wondering: Who came up with this "on-demand" hype?
I don't remember the names, but i remember the root causes. Here we go:
The discussion started when someone with a CD-Server ran out of loops as 256 was the
"fixed" maximum.
The other "root"-cause was that th
On 11.11.2013 14:05, Shahbaz Youssefi wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > I don't see a way around "borders" (Papers please), otherwise you can't
> > reject things you don't want, you have to check if that somethin
On 26.06.2014 13:57, Luká? Czerner wrote:
> > So if the authors want to sell this new interface (in whatever form) to
> > the kernel community, they should start with providing a solid use-case,
> > with some more details, explore alternatives and show how the
> > alternatives do not work for them
59 matches
Mail list logo
