kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3182 - occurred during heavy NFS transfer

2017-11-01 Thread Nathan Royce
ODroid XU4 Arch Linux Kernel 4.13 (custom) 4TB USB 3.0 mechanical WD Drive/hub (had bad-block issues in the past that were "corrected") Occurred when using rsync to copy files to an encfs mount over nfs (only 22MB made it). Note, I keep the activity on my odroid very low or things start to bug out

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3182 - occurred during heavy NFS transfer

2017-11-01 Thread Nathan Royce
I'm guessing this is related. I noticed my tv wasn't recording to my drive and when I tried to touch a file on the drive, my console become unresponsive. Trying to reboot took like 5 minutes to even stop the processes and in the end couldn't unmount the drive and I had to cut the power to finally g

Re: kmemleak: Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-06 Thread Nathan Royce
: temp unit: 0 Jan 06 03:27:21 computername plasmashell[1065]: qml: temp unit: 0 Jan 06 03:27:24 computername plasmashell[1065]: qml: temp unit: 0 * On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 7:04 PM Nathan Royce wrote: > > It was unrelated to my USB issue. It happened again after I rebooted > within 4 ho

Re: kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-06 Thread Nathan Royce
I'm only posting to say I'm still waiting... The error came up while I slept, and when I copied that log and looked at it (yes, it WAS huge, just as you said), the timestamps at the head/tail were much later than the journal logged times. So I made a little script to monitor the journal kernel entr

kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-01 Thread Nathan Royce
Kernel 4.19.13 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI Controller Around 400 "unknown event type 37" messages logged in a 2 second span. * Jan 01 02:08:07 computername tvheadend[2370]: linuxdvb: Auvitek AU8522 QAM/8VSB Frontend #0 : ATSC-T #0 - poll TIMEOUT

kmemleak: Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-01 Thread Nathan Royce
Kernel 4.19.13 * Jan 01 02:04:20 computername kernel: xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 Jan 01 02:04:20 computername kernel: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2236 at mm/page_alloc.c:4254 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xf52/0xfb0 Jan 01 02:04:20 computername kernel: Modules linked in: rfcomm ccm

Re: kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-01 Thread Nathan Royce
opped. Just to be sure, I also rebooted and it's still fine. No xhci errors at all. The only thing I've done recently (within the past few days) was play with my scanner which is also on that hub and maybe brushed my tuner cable or something. On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 12:57 PM Nath

Re: kmemleak: Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-01 Thread Nathan Royce
n 01 17:50:25 computername plasmashell[1048]: qt.qpa.xcb: QXcbConnection: XCB error: 2 (BadValue), sequence: 47417, resource id: 71303170, major code: 142 (Unknown), minor code: 3 ***** On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 1:17 PM Nathan Royce wrote: > > Kernel 4.19.13 > > * > Jan 01 02:04:20 c

Re: kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-02 Thread Nathan Royce
...But then again, maybe it wasn't the cable. It's acting up again. On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 3:14 PM Nathan Royce wrote: > > Looks like this particular issue may have been due to a touchy/finicky > connection. > > I removed my tuner from my hub and removed the hub from m

drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c s3c24xx_uart_copy_rx_to_tty

2018-04-27 Thread Nathan Royce
No idea why, but I will say that something I've done recently was re-enabl my ath9k_htc wireless adapter which tends to firmware-panic quite a bit which also sometimes kills off my ppp usb adapter. I have a script running that monitors the journalctl and restarts hostapd everytime my ath device fir

Re: ath9k_htc - Division by zero in kernel (as well as firmware panic)

2018-04-24 Thread Nathan Royce
I finally got around to applying your patch, building the toolchain (based on master source (gcc8)), but alas while there is no firmware panic in the log, wifi drops off the face of the planet (ssid disappears and hostapd doesn't know wifi failed (nothing in the log either)). On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 a

BTRFS Balance Hard System Crash (Blinking LEDs)

2021-03-26 Thread Nathan Royce
* ...I "think" this is where the "emergency" drop out of boot occurred, and I just did a "systemctl reboot" which had the next boot succeed. Nope, I'm wrong. For whatever reason, this appears to be the boot that ended up working (searching for the first "microcode" reference indicating the star

Re: BTRFS Balance Hard System Crash (Blinking LEDs)

2021-03-26 Thread Nathan Royce
n) and everything seems fine (so far) as I write this and have the recorded DVR playing (kodi). I don't know what those "kernel: Code:" is supposed to be/mean to me. On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 8:29 AM Nathan Royce wrote: > > * > ...I "think" this is where the &quo

Re: F2FS Segmentation Fault

2021-03-27 Thread Nathan Royce
ed corruption. Info: Force to fix corruption Info: Segments per section = 1 Info: Sections per zone = 1 Info: sector size = 512 Info: total sectors = 124168159 (60628 MB) Can't find a valid F2FS superblock at 0x0 Mismatch segment0(3096048428) cp_blkaddr(24874649)

Re: F2FS Segmentation Fault

2021-03-27 Thread Nathan Royce
pply fan. The whole debacle (including btrfs, keyboard leds blinking) may very well have been from the sd-card not being seated well. On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 7:02 AM Nathan Royce wrote: > > An update, not quite 1 year later. I encountered another segfault issue. > > It began with my email r

Re: BTRFS Balance Hard System Crash (Blinking LEDs)

2021-03-27 Thread Nathan Royce
as being LUKS even though badblocks was run non-destructive. On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:51 AM Nathan Royce wrote: > > Oh man, I'm hoping things aren't starting to fall apart here. > I was doing my normal routine (tv, browsing, ... (no filesystem > manipulations)) and out of th

Kernel 5.2.8 - au0828 - Tuner Is Busy

2019-08-16 Thread Nathan Royce
Right up front, I must say I do NOT have a Hauppauge tuner. I think it's like maybe Mygica/Geniatech: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 05e1:0400 Syntek Semiconductor Co., Ltd Whenever I update my kernel, I edit the ./drivers/media/usb/au0828/au0828-cards.c file adding an entry for my 0x400 device. I've been

Re: Kernel 5.2.8 - au0828 - Tuner Is Busy

2019-08-16 Thread Nathan Royce
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:42 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > If you revert that one commit, does things start working again? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hey Greg, I just got finished building it after running "$ git revert 812658d88d26" and verifying it reverted by comparing one of the files from git

Re: Kernel 5.2.8 - au0828 - Tuner Is Busy

2019-08-19 Thread Nathan Royce
(resubmitting due to non "reply-to-all"): Bugger, I just sent a reply to your last message, but it bounced back with: * 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The message contains HTML subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM or Outlook Virus. TEXT/PLAIN is accepted.! BF:; S1728494AbfHSVzk * I

Re: Kernel 5.2.8 - au0828 - Tuner Is Busy

2019-08-19 Thread Nathan Royce
d be implemented in the git tool and the user only needs to provide a starting place. Just a thought. I can only hope that I incorrectly used bisecting and someone can point to what I did wrong and provide a better way. (maybe I wouldn't have to mrproper, so the testing wouldn't take day

Re: Kernel 5.2.8 - au0828 - Tuner Is Busy

2019-08-19 Thread Nathan Royce
While your mention of quirks-table.h certainly had possibilities, I'm afraid adding the "AU0828_DEVICE(0x05e1, 0x0400, "Hauppauge", "Woodbury")," entry for my tuner did not make any difference regarding the "Tuner is busy. Error -19" message. I don't know if this means anything, but I see https://

Re: kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-08 Thread Nathan Royce
OK, I finally got one... but there was only 1 journal log entry. The previous time there were like maybe 10 (also very little), but the 2 times before that had enough for me to have to page through the log. I actually messed up on a variable in my script so missed the actual time, but the trace st

Re: kmemleak: Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-08 Thread Nathan Royce
out. I have 8GB RAM in my desktop. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:52 AM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 01:17:06PM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: > > I had a leak somewhere and I was directed to look into SUnreclaim > > which was 5.5 GB after an upt

Re: kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-09 Thread Nathan Royce
You can ignore the last set of files with a sample of 1. I got a nice sample of like 150 about 6 hours ago. The link I included in the previous reply contains the same filenames, just updated. The journal timestamps (to correspond with the trace times) go from "[513438.430253] computername kernel:

Re: kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR unknown event type 37 - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-09 Thread Nathan Royce
Wow, my system got wrecked (exaggeration) during this latest stretch... Pulseaudio was stretched to the limit and beyond and was forced to restart. Anything that was producing audio had to be restarted to get it back. This time was much like the first time and went from timestamp 573100.060927 (lin

Re: kmemleak: Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure - Kernel 4.19.13

2019-01-10 Thread Nathan Royce
One more thought that may be nothing, but when kmemleak crashed, SUnreclaim was at 932552 kB, and after reclaimed/cleared 299840 kB. There weren't any performance issues like when I had a leak of 5.5 gB in the 4.18 kernel. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:52 AM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Under memory pre

ath: firmware panic! exccause: 0x0000000d

2017-03-27 Thread Nathan Royce
I find that every time all of the cpu cores are being used, when compiling the kernel source for example, I end up losing my wireless adapter. It seems to be an old issue: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=182173 ARM ODroid XU4 $ uname -a Linux server 4.11.0-rc1-00315-g106e4da60209-dirty

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-09 Thread Nathan Royce
Gave it a try on 4.10.1, but still to no avail: * [8.516138] raid6: using intx1 recovery algorithm [ [0;32m OK [0m] Started Flush Journal to Persistent Storage. [9.692091] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0004 [9.698896] pgd = c0004000 [

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-10 Thread Nathan Royce
hread (irq 69) * I'm sure you could just copy my crypttab and fstab entries that is shown in my first email. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:16:35AM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: >> Gave it a try on 4.10.1, but still to no av

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-03 Thread Nathan Royce
.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg23748.html On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 03:00:26AM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: >> OK, I went ahead and enabled self tests >> "CRYPTO_MANAGER_DISABLE_TESTS=n", and my system was ab

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-03 Thread Nathan Royce
of this issue. Also let me know if you would like the rest of the kernel panic. Maybe you already have enough to go on and don't need it. Thanks for all that clarity. On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:36:18AM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: >>

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-06 Thread Nathan Royce
wasn't using plain-text, but my full post shows in Herbert's reply. On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:02:10PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:35:30PM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: >> > ARM ODroid

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-06 Thread Nathan Royce
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:18:45AM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: >> I tried the patch you submitted, however it also fails for the most part. >> >> "For the most part" because "xts" is now found. >> $ grep xts /proc/crypt

Re: XTS Crypto Not Found In /proc/crypto Even After Compiled for 4.10.1.

2017-03-03 Thread Nathan Royce
mail submission because I didn't enable plain-text for the e-mail (marked as spam because the email contained html). I rectified that for this reply. On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:35:30PM -0600, Nathan Royce wrote: >> ARM

F2FS Segmentation Fault

2020-07-13 Thread Nathan Royce
I won't re-format unless I hear something within a few days in case you want me to try something. Preface: There was a notable power outage a couple of nights ago. When the power returned, everything seemed fine. No issues during bootup or anything. Then today, I went to open an application and my

Re: F2FS Segmentation Fault

2020-07-13 Thread Nathan Royce
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:03 PM Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > Could you try to say "N" here to move forward to fix the corrupted metadata? > > Thanks, * Do you want to restore lost files into ./lost_found/? [Y/N] N Info: Write valid nat_bits in checkpoint [FIX] (nullify_nat_entry:2273)

localmodconfig - "intel_rapl_perf config not found!!"

2020-08-25 Thread Nathan Royce
Intel Haswell Linux 5.8.3 First time I've used localmodconfig ever since reading what it does and liking the "supposed" kernel customization specific to the system. I only use quotes on "supposed" because I DO still see entries I have no interest in (not applicable to my system/needs). I don't kno

Re: localmodconfig - "intel_rapl_perf config not found!!"

2020-08-25 Thread Nathan Royce
Correct. I'm building for 5.8.3 and I'm currently on 5.7.4 (1 month doesn't seem particularly old). On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:13 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > so intel_rapl_perf is listed in your lsmod.cfg file: > intel_rapl_perf16384 2 > > You say Linux 5.8.3. I'm guessing that your "make

Re: [PATCH] kconfig: streamline_config.pl: check defined(ENV variable) before using it

2020-09-02 Thread Nathan Royce
Thanks, but I'd just as soon not be acknowledged/credited. All I did was submit a report. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:47 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Applied to linux-kbuild/fixes with Nathan's tag > > Reported-by: Nathan Royce > > > > Nathan, > I think

Re: [PATCH] kconfig: streamline_config.pl: check defined(ENV variable) before using it

2020-09-02 Thread Nathan Royce
Heard, but all the same if it isn't important (which I'm assuming), I'd just as soon be left out of it. That's just the way I am in general, not wanting to be seen unless I have to be seen. Thanks though. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:14 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Even if you do not write the code,

ath9k - Division by zero in kernel (as well as firmware panic)

2017-06-02 Thread Nathan Royce
ODroid XU4 $ uname -a Linux computer 4.12.0-rc3-dirty #1 SMP Wed May 31 15:02:05 CDT 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux $ lsusb ... Bus 001 Device 002: ID 2109:2813 VIA Labs, Inc. Bus 001 Device 010: ID 0cf3:7015 Qualcomm Atheros Communications TP-Link TL-WN821N v3 / TL-WN822N v2 802.11n [Atheros AR7010+AR928

Re: ath9k_htc - Division by zero in kernel (as well as firmware panic)

2017-06-03 Thread Nathan Royce
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Hm... this function and file: > linux/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-beacon.c > didn't changed since 2015. So, it should be some thing different. > Can you run > git bisect to find exact patch caused this regression? > That was the fir