Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, Linus, > > > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 06:37 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Linus Torvalds >> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:11 PM, David Miller > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > H

Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 06:20 -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote: >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Coelho, Luciano >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Emmanuel, Linus, >> > >> > >> >

Re: [GIT] Networking

rong, because the incorrect merge came in later. I think > Luciano mis-understood "v4.6+" to mean plain v4.6. > > Reinoud Koornstra, does this patch fix things for you too? Indeed, I meant 4.6+, not 4.6. The patch you attached doesn't change existing code for me in 4.6+ as these two lines are already in there. Thanks, Reinoud. > >Linus

Re: [GIT] Networking

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Reinoud Koornstra wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Linus Torvalds >> wrote: >>> >>> From what I can tell, there's a merge bug in commit 909b27f70643

Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-05-13 (take two)

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Hi Dave, > > this the second version of the last pull request to net-next for 4.7, > which got postponed due to the recent iwlwifi merge conflict. Now that > Linus fixed the merge problem in his tree I actually didn't have to fix > anything in m

small patch to avoid warning in gcc 6

Hello Everybody, A small patch that doesn't really do anything other than getting rid of a warning in gcc 6.1.0. drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ‘i915_dump_lrc’: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2060:6: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ [-Wparentheses]

Re: small patch to avoid warning in gcc 6

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 18:41 -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote: >> Hello Everybody, >> >> A small patch that doesn't really do anything other than getting rid >> of a warning in gcc 6.1.0. >> >> driv

compile failure linux 3.10 with gcc 4.9.3 for mips

Hi Everyone, Did anybody enounter the following compiler problem with linux 3.10.81? gcc version is 4.9.3 for mips. arch/mips/kernel/r4k_fpu.S: Assembler messages: arch/mips/kernel/r4k_fpu.S:59: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips3 (mips3) `sdc1 $f0,272+0($4)' arch/mips/kernel/r4k