On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:12:39PM +, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > From: Tetsuo Handa [mailto:penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp]
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > This is a CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL configuration, isn't it?
> >
> > Yes. CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL_EARLY=y && CONFIG_64BIT=n &&
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:32:14PM +, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > From: Shaun Ruffell [mailto:sruff...@digium.com]
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:12:39PM +, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > > > From: Tetsuo Handa [mailto:penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp]
> > > > H. P
From: Fengguang Wu
From: Fengguang Wu
We need to free up memory in this order:
free csrows[i]->channels[j]
free csrows[i]->channels
free csrows[i]
free csrows
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
d
reporting device not found:vendor 8086 device 0x2541
(broken BIOS?)
EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_free:
Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
EDAC DEBUG: edac_unregister_sysfs: Unregistering device (null)
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 59
free+0x29/0x2f [edac_core]
[ 36.703479] [] e7xxx_probe1+0x268/0x311 [e7xxx_edac]
[ 36.703479] [] ? __pci_enable_device_flags+0x8f/0xd3
[ 36.703479] [] e7xxx_init_one+0x56/0x61 [e7xxx_edac]
[ 36.703479] [] local_pci_probe+0x13/0x15
...
Fengguang Wu (1):
edac_mc: fix kfree calls in t
There are no more embedded kobjects in struct mem_ctl_info. Remove a header and
a comment that does not reflect the code anymore.
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 7 ---
include/linux/edac.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:58:16PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> From: Fengguang Wu
>
> From: Fengguang Wu
Darn it. If you push this through, mind fixing the above?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:55:29PM +0800, Shaohui Xie wrote:
> Error handle in case of DDR ECC off is wrong, sysfs entries have not been
> created, so edac_mc_free which frees a mci instance should not be called.
> Also, free mci's memory in this case.
Jus FYI: I ran into the same error in edac_mc
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:59:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Please do test things out, I'd really like to be able to do the final
> 3.6 soonish..
Linus,
Just a heads up in case you are about to tag v3.6.
v3.6-rc6 still has a regression with edac_mc_alloc()/edac_mc_free()
introduced in c
local_pci_probe+0x13/0x15
...
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Shaohui Xie
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
Hi Linus, I did not bother to resend the third patch [1] since it's
not really *necessary* to boot my system. Fengguang's and this is
sufficient.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-ker
Just a friendly reminder that I'm still seeing this NULL pointer
dereference on boot with 3.6-rc4.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:11:21PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> With kernel version 3.6-rc2 on a Dell Poweredge 2600 I experienced a NULL
> pointer dereference that did not occur wit
[forgot to copy lkml]
Hi Jan,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:28:32PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> At least some older gcc versions dislike mixing constant and non-const
> data in the same section ("... causes a section type confict"). Newer
> gcc simply emits the section as writable (which isn't what
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:25:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> Although the README and Documentation/Changes both say the kernel
> builds with gcc 3.2, this is no loner the case. In reality the new
> 3.7 kernel no longer builds under unpatched gcc 4.2.1 (the last
> GPLv2 release).
>
> Bui
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:22:12AM -0800, Sadasivan Shaiju wrote:
> Hi Venkatesh,
>
> I have applied the following patches for the incorrect accounting
> of irq into the running task .
>
>
> [PATCH] x86: Add IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> [e82b8e4ea4f3dffe6e7939f90e78da675fcc450e]
> [PATCH] sched: Add I
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:32:59AM +, Xie Shaohui-B21989 wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shaun Ruffell [mailto:sruff...@digium.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 2:22 AM
> > To: Xie Shaohui-B21989
> > Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; linuxp
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:43:35AM +, Xie Shaohui-B21989 wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:32:59AM +, Xie Shaohui-B21989 wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW: seems you are using a different kernel tree with mine.
> >
> > On the chance that I missing something important: Why do you say
> > I was run
Adding linux-net to the CC list.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:57:56PM +0100, Dave Haywood wrote:
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00010016
>
> System boots then crashes a 5-10 or so seconds after getting to the
> login prompt
> Bo
From: Fengguang Wu
We need to free up memory in this order:
free csrows[i]->channels[j]
free csrows[i]->channels
free csrows[i]
free csrows
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/e
reporting device not found:vendor 8086 device 0x2541
(broken BIOS?)
EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_free:
Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
EDAC DEBUG: edac_unregister_sysfs: Unregistering device (null)
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 59
ght I would send along what I had if only to motivate any
discussion. I also have resent Fengguang Wu's patch in this series since I found
that it was required as well.
Shaun Ruffell (2):
edac: Remove invalid kfree in error path of edac_mc_allocate().
edac: edac_mc_free() cannot assume mem_c
There are no more embedded kobjects in struct mem_ctl_info. Remove a header and
a comment that does not reflect the code anymore.
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 7 ---
include/linux/edac.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac
[ Fixing netdev cc to use proper dadress... ]
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:21:17PM +0400, Artem Savkov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:25:43PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> > Adding linux-net to the CC list.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:57:56PM +0100, Dave Haywood
Bump. Still an issue with v3.8-rc4. Am I mistaken in thinking this
patch is trivial and obviously correct?
Thanks,
Shaun
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:59:42PM -0600, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich
>
> This patch fixes a build regression first introduced in 3.7 with
> (e09df
o the commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
Hans, Thomas,
Any chance of picking this up for 3.8? This doesn't seem too
controversial since it only makes sure that data in the __initconst
section is const.
Rob Landley also reported this to the list here:
https://lkml.org/lkml
etails to the commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
[I had the wrong stable email address when I previously sent this.
Sorry about the extra noise.]
Hans, Thomas,
Any chance of picking this up for 3.8? This doesn't seem too
controversial since it only makes sure that data in t
I just updated one of my development machines to 3.14 from 3.12.5
and hit a BUG in get_next_timer_interrupt().
In order to get to this point, I had to apply commit (30f2555 "ipv6:
some ipv6 statistic counters failed to disable bh") from the current
master on top of 3.14 to get around a lockdep spl
FYI, it looks like the following patch (committed in
8fc5b4d4121c95482b2583) adds a new requirement to use at least gcc
4.4 to build the kernel?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:33:40PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Create a stand alone relocatable object purgatory which runs between two
> kernels. This n
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:42:59AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Currently new system call kexec_file_load() and all the associated code
> compiles if CONFIG_KEXEC=y. But new syscall also compiles purgatory code
> which currently uses gcc option -mcmodel=large. This option seems to be
> available onl
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> Sending this to both netdev and kernel since i don't know if it's the
> driver or the pcie AER that does something odd - the machine was
> stable before 3.19 and PCIE AER.
>
> Everything started out like i first sent to linux nics () i
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:18:36PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> It was actually fixed with a bios upgrade from Super Micro (in this case)
> so I'd investigate that first... =)
Hmm...interesting. Thanks for the reply!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
> basename = mod->name;
>
> - if (exp->namespace) {
> + if (exp->namespace && exp->namespace[0]) {
> add_namespace(&mod->required_namespaces,
> exp->namespace);
>
This looks good to me and is better than what I had originally proposed.
I confirmed that I can still build an external module without any
warnings. (But I did have to convince myself that it was OK to store
empty namespace strings in the symbol structure and that check_exports()
would cover it sufficiently)
If you would like, feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Shaun Ruffell
or
Tested-by: Shaun Ruffell
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:03:46AM +0100, Matthias Maennich wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> > When building an out-of-tree module I was receiving many warnings from
> > modpost like:
> >
> > WARNING: module dahdi_vpmadt032_l
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 05:19:23PM +0100, Matthias Maennich wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:03:46AM +0100, Matthias Maennich wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> &
ijn Coenen
Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google)
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Matthias Maennich
Cc: Jessica Yu
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell
---
Hi,
I didn't test that this change works with the namespaces, or investigate why
read_dump() is only called first while building out-of-tree modules, but it do
34 matches
Mail list logo
