On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > ok, you are right, the edge case was mishandled - but i think it was
> > > already mishandled upstream, we just never (or rarely) triggered it.
> > > I've reworked this area based on your patch, could you check -51-15,
> > > does it work for you?
I
Hi Ingo,
More SMT weirdness. Latency traces aren't looking quite right on -51-17
with my SMT debug config.
Started jackd, immediately after boot (before logging in to X), then:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/latency_trace
cat/2149[CPU#1]: BUG in update_out_trace at kernel/latency.c:698
[] du
0 8b 84 24 a0 00 00 00 50 <8b> 3c 68 40 c1 00 f9
30 c0 00 f9 30 c0 4c 68 40 c1 4c 68 40 c1
--
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
ThinFlash: Linux thin-client on USB key (flash) drive
http://home.eol.ca/~parkw/thinflash.html
BashDiff: Super Bash shell
Hi
I was told that if I had a patch to submit for a baseline change that
this was the place to do it.
If not, please let me know...
thanks,
morrow
Patched against 2.6.11 baseline
problems fixed:
1) OHCI_INTR_RD not being cleared in ohci interrupt handler
results in interrupt storm and system h
2.6.19.7
It looks like the problem only occurs when using kernel after
2.6.20 with Power Edge 2600.
Anyone know the reason for that?
Any additional information should I provide?
Thanks
William
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
the whole pt_regs
patch (commit 49d26b6eaa8e970c8cf6e299e6ccba2474191bf5) from
kernel.org and see if that has a beneficial effect.
-Bill
----
William Cattey
Linux Platform Coordinator
MIT Information Services & Technology
N42-040M, 617-253-0140, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.mit.edu/wdc/w
The following quote is from the article "Linux Kernel Security, Again"
(http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/308):
"Don't get me wrong. Linux doesn't suck. But I do believe that the
Linux kernel team (and some of the Linux distributions that are still
vulnerable to fork bombing) need to take pr
Thanks. That's what I thought. Sorry for the annoyance.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:22:21 -0500, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:06:57PM -0500, William Beebe wrote:
>
> > Is this really a kernel issue? Or is there a better way in userland to
ith either
words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by
the endurance of those whom they oppress."
-- Frederick Douglass, August 4, 1857
(Courtesy of Eric S. Raymond)
------
William Stearns
lags);
> if (spin_trylock(&mpu->output_lock)) {
> snd_mpu401_uart_output_write(mpu);
> spin_unlock(&mpu->output_lock);
> }
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
esting:
.. [] __do_IRQ+0xfb/0x1a0
.[] .. ( <= do_IRQ+0x6f/0xb0)
.. [] print_traces+0x1b/0x60
.[] .. ( <= dump_stack+0x23/0x30)
Additional info about the system/kernel/config can be found at
http://www.sysex.net/testing/
Best Regards,
--William Weston
O
re-compiling 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 with the extra pass of
> kallsyms to see if the problem persists with this release.
Try 'acpi=noirq'.
--
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because I can type.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:47:15PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:45:58PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> > > For some kernel versions (say, since 2.6.10 proper, all the 2.6.11-rc's,
> > > some -mm
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:50:43PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote:
> > This looks awefully like 'acpi' is on. If 'acpi=noirq' does not work,
> > then try 'pci=noacpi'.
>
> Hi, Willian.
>
> First of
q+0x0/0x60)
At which point, USB is dead.
Do you know if 'acpi' is responsible for this?
--
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because I can type.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:32:12AM +, William Park wrote:
> I'm runing 2.6.10 SMP. I usually use APM, but I decided to try ACPI.
> On my machine, USB (integrated) and Audio (PCI card) shares IRQ:
...
> After a while, I get
>
> irq 185: nobody cared!
> [] __r
ng 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 with the extra pass of
> kallsyms to see if the problem persists with this release.
Try 'acpi=noirq'. It did it for me (Abit VP6 dual-p3, Via VT82C694X,
Via VT82C686B).
--
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because I can t
Is this a known bug in tmscsim.o (2.0f, included with 2.2.19):
I have the following devices (cat /proc/scsi/scsi)
Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST15230N Rev: 0638
Type: Direct-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host:
I have 3c905CX and 2.4.5 kernel. Maybe you have
2 cards inside? ;-)
--
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
8 CPUs cluster, (Slackware) Linux, Python, LaTeX, Vim, Mutt, Sc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
---
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt man doing
it."
-- Old Chinese Proverb
------
William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Mason, Buil
t vulnerability is completely theoretical." -- Microsoft
L0pht, Making the theoretical practical since 1992.
(Courtesy of "Deliduka, Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
--
William Stearns ([EMAIL P
time I
checked. Why not get dual, and take a coffee break?
--
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
8 CPUs cluster, (Slackware) Linux, Python, LaTeX, Vim, Mutt, Sc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
Hello,
Have a system with an Asus P5A motherboard, Classic Pentium-200
underclocked to 180 MHz, and 196 MB of real memory. Up through 2.4.4 it
has performed flawlessly. Kernels 2.4.5 and 2.4.6 will not complete the
boot.
Boot looks normal through the F0 0F check, and the message
y way to know when you have done something truly great is when your
spine tingles."
- on Alice Kober, cryptanalist, in The Code Book, Simon Singh.
--
William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Mason, Buildkernel, named2hos
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:57:38AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I've long since decided that there's no point to making "-pre". What's
> the difference between a "-pre" and a daily -bk snapshot? Really?
>
> So when I do a release, it _is_ an -rc. The fact that people have
> trouble understanding
Hi, my name is William Ie and I am currently working with the mc group. We
are currently looking into how capability checks are used in the 2.4.3
kernel. Along the way, we found a few potential bugs that we are not too
sure about. Please bear in mind our checker right now is still very very
crude
I was wondering if anyone could tell me who is responsible for the patch I
have included? It fixes some issues with scanning the scsi bus,
specifically it reports luns higher than 8. I am just wondering if whoever
has created this if they have submitted it to be included in the mainstream
2.2.x
: ST315320A, ATA DISK drive
hdc: CD-ROM 24X/AKOx, ATAPI CDROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 <-- hangs here
Interestingly, I didn't have this problem with ide-2.2.18 patch.
--William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, Mississauga,
ering, since Coppermine
> is basically a newish PIII with 128K less cache...
Try both, and see if your machine throws up.
--William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
8 CPUs, Linux, python, LaTeX, vim, mutt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:06:24PM -, mirabilos wrote:
> Hmmm is he sure he knows what linux is...?
> I dunno whether he has understood the concept right,
> maybe he'll post a WDM driver ;-)
Well, what is your answer? How do you submit your own driver?
--William Park,
Hi, my name is William Ie and I am currently working under Dawson Engler's
mc project here in the Stanford CS dept. We are currently trying to
develop security related bug-checkers, particularly regarding the
capability checks done in the linux kernel. While going through the
results o
ill
---
"If you think technology can solve your security problems, then
you don't understand the problems and you don't understand the
technology."
-- Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies
------
William St
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:10:32PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
Hi Will,
I found kprobes expects there to be a pre_handler function in the
structure. I was writing a probe that only needed a post_handler
function, no pre_handler function. The probe was tracking
but I can't load the kernel from USB key drive.
--
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because I can type.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:01:23PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
> William Park wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 06:26:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >>On Monday, 17 of January 2005 18:17, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>
- they only hide the problem and make it harder
> to reproduce.
The problem at hand is that USB key drive (which is my immediate
concern) takes 5sec to show up. So, it's much better approach than
'initrd'.
--
William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware
sb-storage devices which no longer make their partitions
> immediately available, and for other storage devices which require some
> "spin-up" time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Very concise. It's much better than 2.4 patch or its 2.6 ada
Robert Richter wrote:
On 10.11.07 21:32:39, Andi Kleen wrote:
It would be really good to extract a core perfmon and start with
that and then add stuff as it makes sense.
e.g. core perfmon could be something simple like just support
to context switch state and initialize counters in a basic way
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:35:11AM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
Robert Richter wrote:
On 10.11.07 21:32:39, Andi Kleen wrote:
It would be really good to extract a core perfmon and start with
that and then add stuff as it makes sense.
e.g. core perfmon could be
Andi Kleen wrote:
One approach does not prevent the other. Assuming you allow cr4.pce, then
nothing prevents
a self-monitoring thread from reading the counters directly. You'll just get the
lower 32-bit of it. So if you read frequently enough, you should not have a
problem.
Hmm? RDPMC is 64b
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:00:56AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
No, he is talking about something similar to what was in perfctr.
The kernel emulates 64-bit counters in software and that is you
get back when you read the counters. If you read via RDPMC, you
get 40 bits. To re
Hi LKML,
Thanks to Vojtech for some advice, I finally got something happening
with this. Turns out I had to add support for a new model in alps.c,
the attached file does this successfully for my laptop. It'd be nice to
have others test it, but I am yet to find anyone else who has this same
laptop
Hi,
This patch adds support for the Alps touchpad on my Dell Vostro 1400 to
the linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: William Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vojtech, I went over my debug info again with your thoughts in mind, and
you were right. The highest bit is always set in the sync byte
I tried 0xff and 0xf8 as
they were two common options.
Is anyone familiar with the Alps driver, and able to help me work out
how to get this touchpad working?
William
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
.
When we put a known value in each byte of the buffer before making
the vm86 call, the known data would always be overwritten either with
EDID data or zeros.
-Bill
William Cattey
Linux Platform Coordinator
MIT Information Services & Technology
W92-176, 617-253-0140, [EMAIL PROTE
e's a race condition with memory not being
where it's expected to be when a large app calls out to real mode?
-Bill
William Cattey
Linux Platform Coordinator
MIT Information Services & Technology
W92-176, 617-253-0140, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.mit.edu/wdc/www/
On Aug 14
tched, until the compiler gets fixed
to properly handle it.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Jan 21, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Benny Halevy wrote:
Douglas Gilbert wrote:
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
- Introduce a new enum dma_data_direction data_dir member in
struct request.
and remove the RW bit from request->cmd_flag
- Add new API to query request direction.
- Adjust existing API and impleme
This past week I was playing around with that pahole tool
(http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/) and looking at the
size of various struct in the kernel. I was surprised by the size of
the task_struct on x86_64, approaching 4K. I looked through the
fields in task_struct and found that
After last week's experiment reducing size of task_struct on I was
curious to see what things are using up memory on the system and which
structs have the largest impact on the space used. /proc/slabinfo
provides information about the number objects allocated and their
sizes. With one line script
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.20.
This new kernel patch includes the following new features and
bug fixes:
- first cut at supporting Oprofile on i386 and x86-64 ar
William Cohen wrote:
Hello Stephane,
The oprofile patch should be made against the oprofile cvs rather than
the 0.9.2 tarball. There are some files that the patch touches that are
created by the autogen.sh.
The oprofile patch doesn't build if things are configured without the
&quo
ing something? Do I need to change linuxrc? Does someone have a
simple example
of how to do an NFS Root FS?
Would appreciate any points.
--
Thanks for your time.
William Estrada
Email : MrUmunhum at popdial dot com
Resume : www.Mt-Umunhum-Wireless.net/resume/william_estrada.html
HT
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base packages.
There is no major updates in this version compared to 061127. This is
a convenience release so that people can use plain 2.6.19.
The perfmon2 kernel changes are:
- fix UP exit bug in
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:24:36PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
Some of the ptrace functions (e.g. ptrace_may_attach in perfmon_syscall.c)
being used in the perfmon kernel patches will go away with the utrace
patches: http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace/
At least
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 06:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:21:09 +0100
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it's really true that oprofile is simply busted then that's a serious
problem and we should find some way of unbusting it. If that means jus
Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hello,
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.19-rc6-git10.
This is a major update because it completes the changes requested
during the code review on LKML. As a consequence, the kernel
I'm not on either list, keep me in CC.
I noticed the following error on a cdrom device:
ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata2.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:00:20/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 0
res 40/00:03:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata2:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:32:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:35:39AM -0400, Darren wrote:
I know this may sound kind of stupid, but how about not deprecating either,
and fully supporting both sound systems? Maybe we can get them to work
together, and the distro or user can c
it can do. It may be a great idea:
but it's really not needed to solve this particular little
problem. As last time around, you were suggesting .mremap
callouts; but I much prefer your original shmem_zero_nopage,
which is a solution of the scale appropriate to the problem.
Such a thing coul
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, William Tambe wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
I've come right around to your original view, Stas, and William's:
if that mmap creates such an object, then the expanding mremap really
ought to be useful, and allow the underlying object to be exp
nt see any backtrace info. Any suggestions would be welcome.
Regards,
William Montgomery
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please r
Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hi.
William Tambe wrote:
I understand your concern. But since I am working on a dynamic memory
management code that I wish to use with other projects that I have, I
didn't find appropriate to use shm_open.
Could you please provide a detailed list of the
problem
In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition
that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using
a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable
and occurs on 2 out of 3 computers.
Further testing has revealed that the lockup can be preve
Thanks for responding. I am very interested to find the source of this
problem.
Kok, Auke wrote:
William Montgomery wrote:
In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition
that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using
a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet
Kok, Auke wrote:
William Montgomery wrote:
Thanks for responding. I am very interested to find the source of
this problem.
Kok, Auke wrote:
William Montgomery wrote:
In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition
that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition
that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using
a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable
and occur
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after
the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a
couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be handled
correctly. An
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after
the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a
couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be handled
correctly. An
Kok, Auke wrote:
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER Hub interface to
PCI Bridge (rev 82) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fa
I read a post that you made about not being able to expand anonymous
shared mapping with mremap(). And I am actually having that issue now.
You made the post in 2004 and we are now in 2007. I would like to know
if that feature was added because the code below always fail with bus
error on my m
writing in an expended area not to generate a Bus error?
Sincerely,
William Tambe
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, William Tambe wrote:
I read a post that you made about not being able to expand anonymous shared
mapping with mremap(). And I am actually having that issue now.
I gu
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:26:31PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> William Thompson wrote:
> > I'm not on either list, keep me in CC.
> >
> > I noticed the following error on a cdrom device:
> > ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> > a
The recent changes in the 2.6.22-rc2 kernel to the write protection of read only
data enable by CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA prevents kprobes from working. At least on
the on i386 and x86_64 machine the mark_rodata_ro() function marks memory
starting from _text as read only. Thus, when kprobes attempts t
8b 55 ec 89 04 24 89 f0 e8 82 ff ff ff
3d 00 f0 ff ff 89 c7 76 0d 8b 45 f0 e8 dc fb ff ff 89 7d f0 eb 56 <8b> 40 0c bb
20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
[ 3972.138557] EIP: [] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
Is this a bug?
If any more information is neces
reiser4 support, etc.
I don't see why something like plugins should matter. If it works enough
to be marked as experimental, why shouldn't reiser4 support be included?
It's a pain for me personally to have to patch any kernel with reiser4
support so I can use the reiser4 fs.
Willi
William Heimbigner wrote:
> Eric Hopper wrote:
> > I know that this whole effort has been put in disarray by the
> > prosecution of Hans Reiser, but I'm curious as to its status.
>
> It was in disarray well before. Many of the reiser4 features,
> like
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
However, is the code really in such a shape that the community doesn't
want to maintain it? Obviously there's a significant number of people
interested in reiser4 - if there weren't, questions like this
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
If there was 1) a maintainer and 2) code that didn't break "coding
standards", would it be included in the kernel?
While I cannot speak for Linus and Andrew, code that fulfills
these criteria (and is
t shouldn't cause too much problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: William Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Willam, please verify this fixes your problem. Jeff, after all, we
> seem to need this. :-(
Seems that I have a different vers
t shouldn't cause too much problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: William Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Willam, please verify this fixes your problem. Jeff, after all, we
> seem to need this. :-(
Even though you have a diffe
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time
trying to set up packet writing.
William
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first ti
ral solution to a very
specific circumstance.
If there is any more information I can provide, let me know.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:09:18 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This bug occurs in linux-2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc7-git5, and does not occur in
linux-2.6.19-git22.
After running "pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd", I get (ti
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:10:04 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--- a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c~packet-fix-error-handling
+++ a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
@@ -777,7 +777,8 @@ static int pkt_generic_packet(stru
X bit.
Would having this be supported in i386 help debugging (and security)
significantly?
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kerne
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow for default
governors of conservative/ondemand/powersave?
I'm not aware of any reason why one of those governors could not be used
as default.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi William,
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow for default
governors of conservative/ondemand/powersave?
Performance?
I'm not aware of any reason
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Question: is there some r
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
&g
The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and
ondemand in the kernel configuration.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6-hwill/drivers
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner wrote:
> The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and
> ondemand in the kernel configuration.
This has been rejected several times already.
Ondema
d in the kernel, and then various userspace implementations could take
care of this? Or is all of the software suspend code in the kernel absolutely
necessary, such that this wouldn't work?
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
ld have a generic suspend mechanism in the kernel, and then
various other things done in userspace.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-25-02-49.tar.gz has been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-25-02-49.tar.gz
Was support for UnionFS deliberately removed in this release?
William Heimbigner
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:53:00 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
OK. I am able to use the pktcdvd driver OK in mainline with a piix/sata
drive. It could be that something is
I noticed that many of the architectures have support for CONFIG_CMDLINE (which
allows for the configuration of a default kernel command lines), however, x86
doesn't. Is this intentional, and if so, why? It seems to me that a built in
command line would be architecture-independent.
Wi
s is on an iMac G3 powerpc.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ravamudan wrote:
>> > On 4/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner wrote:
>> >> > The following patches should allow selection of conservative,
powersave, and
>> >> &g
101 - 200 of 1894 matches
Mail list logo
