f0 eb 56 8b 40 0c bb
20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
[ 3972.138557] EIP: [c0161aef] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
Is this a bug?
If any more information is necessary, I'd be happy to provide it.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list
, etc.
I don't see why something like plugins should matter. If it works enough
to be marked as experimental, why shouldn't reiser4 support be included?
It's a pain for me personally to have to patch any kernel with reiser4
support so I can use the reiser4 fs.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED
William Heimbigner wrote:
Eric Hopper wrote:
I know that this whole effort has been put in disarray by the
prosecution of Hans Reiser, but I'm curious as to its status.
It was in disarray well before. Many of the reiser4 features,
like filesystem plugins, make more technical
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
However, is the code really in such a shape that the community doesn't
want to maintain it? Obviously there's a significant number of people
interested in reiser4 - if there weren't, questions like this wouldn't
keep
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
If there was 1) a maintainer and 2) code that didn't break coding
standards, would it be included in the kernel?
While I cannot speak for Linus and Andrew, code that fulfills
these criteria (and is useful to have - reiser4
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time
trying to set up packet writing.
William Heimbigner
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time
trying
or not, but obviously this is a very temporal solution to a very
specific circumstance.
If there is any more information I can provide, let me know.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:09:18 + (GMT) William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This bug occurs in linux-2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc7-git5, and does not occur in
linux-2.6.19-git22.
After running pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd, I get (timestamps removed
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:10:04 + (GMT) William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c~packet-fix-error-handling
+++ a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
@@ -777,7 +777,8 @@ static int pkt_generic_packet(struct pkt
rq
.
Would having this be supported in i386 help debugging (and security)
significantly?
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow for default
governors of conservative/ondemand/powersave?
I'm not aware of any reason why one of those governors could not be used
as default.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi William,
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow for default
governors of conservative/ondemand/powersave?
Performance?
I'm not aware of any reason why one
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi William,
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi William,
On 24
The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and
ondemand in the kernel configuration.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6-hwill/drivers
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner wrote:
The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and
ondemand in the kernel configuration.
This has been rejected several times already.
Ondemand and conservative
, and then various userspace implementations could take
care of this? Or is all of the software suspend code in the kernel absolutely
necessary, such that this wouldn't work?
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
mechanism in the kernel, and then
various other things done in userspace.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-25-02-49.tar.gz has been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-25-02-49.tar.gz
Was support for UnionFS deliberately removed in this release?
William Heimbigner
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:53:00 + (GMT) William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
snip
OK. I am able to use the pktcdvd driver OK in mainline with a piix/sata
drive. It could be that something is going
I noticed that many of the architectures have support for CONFIG_CMDLINE (which
allows for the configuration of a default kernel command lines), however, x86
doesn't. Is this intentional, and if so, why? It seems to me that a built in
command line would be architecture-independent.
William
This is on an iMac G3 powerpc.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
wrote:
On 4/24/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner wrote:
The following patches should allow selection of conservative,
powersave, and
ondemand in the kernel configuration.
This has been rejected several times already
:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 4/24/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner
wrote:
The following patches should allow selection of conservative,
powersave
+0x164/0x1dc (unreliable)
[c0583f80] [c0003cc4] rest_init+0x74/0x88
[c0583fa0] [c050fb68] start_kernel+0x310/0x394
[c0583ff0] [37b4] 0x37b4
This occurs after pressing the programmer switch to generate an NMI.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:40:19 + (GMT) William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This bug occurs in linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2, and does not occur in 2.6.21-rc7
ARCH is powerpc
dmesg output, captured via netconsole:
[0.00] Using PowerMac
/etc/security/limits.conf is for?
Just limit the CPU usage.
Root and SCHED_FIFO tasks could be exempt from rate limiting, to avoid
the need to introduce a new rlimit which would take years for
userspace to catch up to.
Lee
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:40:19 + (GMT) William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug occurs in linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2, and does not occur in
2.6.21-rc7
ARCH is powerpc
dmesg output
to properly handle it.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
gets fixed
to properly handle it.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
3d 00 f0 ff ff 89 c7 76 0d 8b 45 f0 e8 dc fb ff ff 89 7d f0 eb 56 <8b> 40 0c bb
20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
[ 3972.138557] EIP: [] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
Is this a bug?
If any more information is necessary, I'd be happy to provide it.
William He
, etc.
I don't see why something like plugins should matter. If it works enough
to be marked as experimental, why shouldn't reiser4 support be included?
It's a pain for me personally to have to patch any kernel with reiser4
support so I can use the reiser4 fs.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED
William Heimbigner wrote:
> Eric Hopper wrote:
> > I know that this whole effort has been put in disarray by the
> > prosecution of Hans Reiser, but I'm curious as to its status.
>
> It was in disarray well before. Many of the reiser4 features,
> like files
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
However, is the code really in such a shape that the community doesn't
want to maintain it? Obviously there's a significant number of people
interested in reiser4 - if there weren't, questions like this wouldn't
keep
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
If there was 1) a maintainer and 2) code that didn't break "coding
standards", would it be included in the kernel?
While I cannot speak for Linus and Andrew, code that fulfills
these criteria (and is usef
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time
trying to set up packet writing.
William Heimbigner
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time
trying
ral solution to a very
specific circumstance.
If there is any more information I can provide, let me know.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:09:18 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This bug occurs in linux-2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc7-git5, and does not occur in
linux-2.6.19-git22.
After running "pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd", I get (ti
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:10:04 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--- a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c~packet-fix-error-handling
+++ a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
@@ -777,7 +777,8 @@ static int pkt_generic_packet(stru
.
Would having this be supported in i386 help debugging (and security)
significantly?
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow for default
governors of conservative/ondemand/powersave?
I'm not aware of any reason why one of those governors could not be used
as default.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi William,
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question: is there some reason that kconfig does not allow for default
governors of conservative/ondemand/powersave?
Performance?
I'm not aware of any reason w
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Question: is there so
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 24/04/07, William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
&g
The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and
ondemand in the kernel configuration.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
linux-2.6.21-rc7-git6-hwill/drivers
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner wrote:
> The following patches should allow selection of conservative, powersave, and
> ondemand in the kernel configuration.
This has been rejected several times already.
On
, and then various userspace implementations could take
care of this? Or is all of the software suspend code in the kernel absolutely
necessary, such that this wouldn't work?
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
mechanism in the kernel, and then
various other things done in userspace.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-25-02-49.tar.gz has been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-25-02-49.tar.gz
Was support for UnionFS deliberately removed in this release?
William Heimbigner
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:53:00 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
OK. I am able to use the pktcdvd driver OK in mainline with a piix/sata
drive. It could be that something is
I noticed that many of the architectures have support for CONFIG_CMDLINE (which
allows for the configuration of a default kernel command lines), however, x86
doesn't. Is this intentional, and if so, why? It seems to me that a built in
command line would be architecture-independent.
William
This is on an iMac G3 powerpc.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ravamudan wrote:
>> > On 4/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner wrote:
>> >> > The following patches should allow selection of conservative,
powersave, and
>> >> &g
ave Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > On 4/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:03:23PM +, William Heimbigner
> > > > > wrote:
&
[c0583f60] [c000a24c] cpu_idle+0x164/0x1dc (unreliable)
[c0583f80] [c0003cc4] rest_init+0x74/0x88
[c0583fa0] [c050fb68] start_kernel+0x310/0x394
[c0583ff0] [37b4] 0x37b4
This occurs after pressing the programmer switch to generate an NMI.
William Heimbign
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:40:19 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This bug occurs in linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2, and does not occur in 2.6.21-rc7
ARCH is powerpc
dmesg output, captured via netconsole:
[0.00] Using Po
t what /etc/security/limits.conf is for?
Just limit the CPU usage.
Root and SCHED_FIFO tasks could be exempt from rate limiting, to avoid
the need to introduce a new rlimit which would take years for
userspace to catch up to.
Lee
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from thi
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:40:19 + (GMT) William Heimbigner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This bug occurs in linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2, and does not occur in
> 2.6.21-rc7
> ARCH is powe
60 matches
Mail list logo