it can do. It may be a great idea:
but it's really not needed to solve this particular little
problem. As last time around, you were suggesting .mremap
callouts; but I much prefer your original shmem_zero_nopage,
which is a solution of the scale appropriate to the problem.
Such a thing coul
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, William Tambe wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
I've come right around to your original view, Stas, and William's:
if that mmap creates such an object, then the expanding mremap really
ought to be useful, and allow the underlying object to be exp
Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hi.
William Tambe wrote:
I understand your concern. But since I am working on a dynamic memory
management code that I wish to use with other projects that I have, I
didn't find appropriate to use shm_open.
Could you please provide a detailed list of the
problem
I read a post that you made about not being able to expand anonymous
shared mapping with mremap(). And I am actually having that issue now.
You made the post in 2004 and we are now in 2007. I would like to know
if that feature was added because the code below always fail with bus
error on my m
writing in an expended area not to generate a Bus error?
Sincerely,
William Tambe
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, William Tambe wrote:
I read a post that you made about not being able to expand anonymous shared
mapping with mremap(). And I am actually having that issue now.
I gu
5 matches
Mail list logo
