On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:29:12PM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> > NOTICE: This e-mail and any included attachments are intended only
> > for the sole use of named and intended recipient (s) only. If you
> > are the named and intended recipient, please note that the
> > information contained in
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, 张猛 wrote:
> > > The A10 manual from http://free-electrons.com/~maxime/pub/datasheet/
> > > does not seem to contain any details about what bad things may happen
> > > if we try to read CNT64_LO_REG w
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:11:11PM +0800, kevin.z.m wrote:
> Hi, Maxime,
>
> > The problem is a bit more complex than that.
>
> > On the A31, the losc clock is actually a mux between an external
> > oscillator running at 32kHz, and the internal oscillator running at
> > 667MHz, that wo
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:10:32PM +0800, kevin.z.m wrote:
> > How does one select either the internal or the external 32kHz
> > oscillator? Is this done in software (I can't find any reference to that
> > in the user manuals) or in hardware?
> For A20, it should be in the Timer module, and there
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 08:34:35AM +0800, kevin.z.m wrote:
> > Ok, just so that we're on the same page, we have two oscillators running
> > at 32kHz, the internal being always there, and the external that could
> > or could not be there, and it's each different hardware block that can
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:39:08PM -0700, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:18 AM, maxime.ripard
> wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:05:06PM +0800, kevin.z.m...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> One question I
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 06:39:28PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please try to keep me in CC, even though the ML doesn't make it easy..
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:06:59AM +0800, Chen-Yu Ts
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> + linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
>
> On 16/04/14 15:09, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 04/16/2014 12:39 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>P
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:13:58PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > If these two clocks are these different though, maybe it would just be
> > easier to add a new driver. These are trivial enough anyway.
>
> Yes it is. But it adds more of the same boilerplate code than actual
> differences of the ha
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:59:38AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 of December 2013 11:07:37 maxime.ripard wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:23:27AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> > Point tak
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:23:27AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Point taken. The current implementation will override settings passed from
> platform data. ORing the two would be better.
Platform_data and DT-based configuration are pretty unlikely to be
used together, so ORing it doesn't have much
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:05:06PM +0800, kevin.z.m...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> One question I couldn't find any answer to is that does the SMP bit is
> >> set in secondary_startup?
> >>
> >> I couldn't find where it was set, but it still looks like the right
> >> thing to do, so I would ex
12 matches
Mail list logo
