PROBLEM: kernel 2.6.22.6 pata_pdc202xx_old.c limiting to UDMA/33 instead of UDMA/100 (UPDATED 2.6.22.6)

2007-08-31 Thread n
Update with kernel 2.6.22.6 i am getting this error now ata2.00: ATA-6: ST3120026A, 3.06, max UDMA/100 here is the new error. ata2.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.01: cmd ca/00:00:25:9c:fc/00:00:00:00:00/f6 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 131072 out res 40/00:00:3f:0

pata_pdc202xx_old bug? (ATA bus error)

2007-09-04 Thread n
anyone come up with a patch/fix for this? i also tried this drive on the system ide ports and it worked fine (also uses libata drivers, nforce2), it seems to be something wrong in the "pata_pdc202xx_old" code. what can i do to get this fixed? the drive is a seagate. i dont know what res 51/84

Re: limiting to UDMA/33 instead of UDMA/100 - pata_pdc202xx_old (also XFS error)?

2007-09-07 Thread n
kernel comes out ill try the new pata_pdc202xx_old drivers again. - Original Message - From: "Jeff Garzik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:47 PM Subj

/dev/mem arch/x86 mm/pat.c break

2016-10-23 Thread n
Hi, Unless I read C wrong, pat.c seems to break all non-strict devmem use. I discovered this while reversing a bunch of pci and other low-level stuff. Here is a link to the fix, http//users.dhp.com/~n/pubs/ the one starting with Linux-86...txt is the correct file, those kernel bugs in OpenBSD

Re: /dev/mem arch/x86 mm/pat.c break

2016-10-24 Thread n
Hey, It looks like https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/8/160 may have taken care of it.. though back in, March or so, I saw it in some recent kernels and had to make this patch myself.. so I dont know if it's committed. --n On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 n...@dhp.com wrote: > Hi, > > Unless

Re: [PATCH linux-next] hugetlbfs: hugetlbfs_fill_super(): remove kfree() redundant null check

2013-02-12 Thread n...@holomorphy.com
Acked-by: Nadia Yvette Chambers On February 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM Tim Gardner wrote: > smatch analysis: > > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:883 hugetlbfs_fill_super() info: redundant null check on > sbinfo->spool calling kfree() > > Cc: Nadia Yvette Chambers > Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner > --- > fs/huget

[PATCH 1/1] fat:fix incorrect function comment

2012-12-18 Thread Ravishankar N
fat_search_long() returns 0 on success, -ENOENT/ENOMEM on failure.Change the function comment accordingly. While at it, fix some trivial typos. modified: fs/fat/dir.c modified: fs/fat/inode.c modified: fs/fat/misc.c Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N Signed-off-by

[PATCH RESEND 1/1] fat:fix incorrect function comment

2012-12-20 Thread Ravishankar N
/misc.c Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon --- fs/fat/dir.c |5 ++--- fs/fat/inode.c |2 +- fs/fat/misc.c |4 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c index 2a18234..58bf744 100644 --- a/fs/fat/dir.c +++ b

2.2.18pre* CONFIG_AGP=Y compile problem

2000-09-12 Thread Nicholas N.
Hello ! There is error during "make bzImage" 2.2.18pre(3,4,5) with CONFIG_AGP=Y. I have it on both Slackware 7.0 and 7.1. Error message follows. make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/Avol02/usr/src/linux-2.2.17/arch/i386/lib' cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.17/include -E -C -P -I/usr/src/linux-

Re: why the interrupt handler should be marked "static" for it is never called directly from another file.

2005-08-11 Thread n l
I see, if a function in a module is not marked by static ,it can be accessed by any other function in kernel, while , using a static can avoid it . thanks a lot !! 2005/8/11, Giuliano Pochini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, n l wrote: > > > could yo

OOPS in shrink_dcache_for_umount

2007-08-02 Thread Chakri n
Hi, We are seeing this problem while unmounting file systems. It happens once in a while. I am able to grab the trace and core from linux-2.6.18-1.8.el5, but I have observed the same problem with linux-2.6.20.1 kernel. Has this problem fixed in recent kernel? BUG: Dentry f7498f70{i=12803e,n

Re: OOPS in shrink_dcache_for_umount

2007-08-05 Thread Chakri n
> "Chakri n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We are seeing this problem while unmounting file systems. It happens > > once in a while. > > I am able to grab the trace and core from linux-2.6.18-1.8.el5, but I > > have observed th

Re: OOPS in shrink_dcache_for_umount

2007-08-06 Thread Chakri n
The patches do not help. The system still paniced in the same place. Still trying to correlate the problem & fix to specific patch. Regards --Chakri On 8/5/07, Chakri n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Malte, > > Thanks for the information. > > Based on your suggestion

Asynchronous Crypto suppor for MPC8360E's Security Engine

2006-12-14 Thread n . balaji
Hi, I am working on MPC8360E Security Engine. I have ported the Openswan 2.4.5(IPSec --KLIPS) with OCF to MPC8360E's Security Engine (Talitos). Encryption and Decryption is working. But when I check the performance of Talitos with netio benchmark Tool, IPSec S/W Algorithms is giving more bandwid

Asynchronous Crypto suppor for MPC8360E's Security Engine

2006-12-19 Thread n . balaji
Hi, I am working on MPC8360E Security Engine. I have ported the Openswan 2.4.5(IPSec --KLIPS) with OCF to MPC8360E's Security Engine (Talitos). Encryption and Decryption is working. But when I check the performance of Talitos with netio benchmark Tool, IPSec S/W Algorithms is giving more bandwidt

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-11-14 Thread Shawn N
Hi Jon, On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > On 26/09/17 16:40, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 26/09/17 00:15, Shawn N wrote: > > ... > > >> From: Shawn Nematbakhsh > >> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:32:38 -0700 > >>

Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros ec: spi: Fix "in progress" error signaling

2017-11-14 Thread Shawn N
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:35:27PM -0700, Shawn Nematbakhsh wrote: >> For host commands that take a long time to process, cros ec can return >> early by signaling a EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS result. The host must then poll >> status with EC_CMD_GET_C

A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-27 Thread Chakri n
Hi, In my testing, a unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system. This is not seen in 2.4. I started 20 threads doing I/O on a NFS share. They are just doing 4K writes in a loop. Now I stop NFS server hosting the NFS share and start a "dd" process to write a file on local EXT3 file s

Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-28 Thread Chakri n
It's 2.6.23-rc6. Thanks --Chakri On 9/28/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 02:01 -0700, Chakri n wrote: > > Thanks for explaining the adaptive logic. > > > > > However other devices will at that moment try to maintain a li

Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-28 Thread Chakri n
It's works on .23-rc8-mm2 with out any problems. "dd" process does not hang any more. Thanks for all the help. Cheers --Chakri On 9/28/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ and one copy for the list too ] > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 02:20 -0700, Chakr

Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-28 Thread Chakri n
Thanks. The BDI dirty limits sounds like a good idea. Is there already a patch for this, which I could try? I believe it works like this, Each BDI, will have a limit. If the dirty_thresh exceeds the limit, all the I/O on the block device will be synchronous. so, if I have sda & a NFS mount, th

Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-28 Thread Chakri n
e calculations where it does not fall back to sync mode. Thanks --Chakri On 9/28/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ please don't top-post! ] > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 01:27 -0700, Chakri n wrote: > > > On 9/27/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-28 Thread Chakri n
Here is a the snapshot of vmstats when the problem happened. I believe this could help a little. crash> kmem -V NR_FREE_PAGES: 680853 NR_INACTIVE: 95380 NR_ACTIVE: 26891 NR_ANON_PAGES: 2507 NR_FILE_MAPPED: 1832 NR_FILE_PAGES: 119779 NR_FILE_DIR

Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)

2007-09-28 Thread Chakri n
No change in behavior even in case of low memory systems. I confirmed it running on 1Gig machine. Thanks --Chakri On 9/28/07, Chakri n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a the snapshot of vmstats when the problem happened. I believe > this could help a little. > &

NFS on loopback locks up entire system(2.6.23-rc6)?

2007-09-20 Thread Chakri n
Hi, I am testing NFS on loopback locks up entire system with 2.6.23-rc6 kernel. I have mounted a local ext3 partition using loopback NFS (version 3) and started my test program. The test program forks 20 threads allocates 10MB for each thread, writes & reads a file on the loopback NFS mount. Afte

Re: NFS on loopback locks up entire system(2.6.23-rc6)?

2007-09-20 Thread Chakri n
ile system locking, so that user can use "mount --bind" on local host and NFS mount on remote nodes, but file & record locking will be consistent between both the nodes? Thanks --Chakri On 9/20/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 17:2

Re: [NFS] NFS on loopback locks up entire system(2.6.23-rc6)?

2007-09-21 Thread Chakri n
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 20:12 -0700, Chakri n wrote: > > Thanks Trond, for clarifying this for me. > > > > I have seen similar behavior when a remote NFS server is not > > available. Many processes wait end up waiting in nfs_release_page

Re: [NFS] NFS on loopback locks up entire system(2.6.23-rc6)?

2007-09-21 Thread Chakri n
stion logic? Thanks --Chakri On 9/21/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:20 -0700, Chakri n wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > I was using flock (BSD locking) and I think the problem should be > > solved if I move my application to u

Re: [NFS] NFS on loopback locks up entire system(2.6.23-rc6)?

2007-09-21 Thread Chakri n
On 9/21/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. The requirement for 'hard' mounts is not that the server be up all > the time. The server can go up and down as it pleases: the client can > happily recover from that. > > The requirement is rather that nobody remove it permanently before

Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.

2007-08-21 Thread Chakri n
To add to the pain, lsof or fuser hang on unresponsive shares. I wrote my own wrapper to go through the "/proc/" file tables and find any process using the unresponsive mounts and kill those processes.This works well. Also, it brings another point. If the unresponsives problem cannot be fixed for

United Nations Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs

2015-06-10 Thread U / N
Please read the attached letter and immediately contact the bank for your draft/cheque claim. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus United Nations Compensation Unit.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

RE: [REGRESSION] "ALSA: HDA: Early Forbid of runtime PM" broke my laptop's internal audio

2021-01-28 Thread N, Harshapriya
> The laptop's speakers produce no sound. Audio from headphones still works > fine. A quick test is to visit GNOME System Settings -> Sound -> Output, > select Test, click Front Left or Front Right and notice there is no sound. I > tested a mainline kernel revision from yesterday > (5.11-rc5+) and

Re: Keyboard dead for a bunch of LG laptops

2014-01-24 Thread Shawn N
Thanks for the bug report + bisect. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Joonas Saarinen wrote: > Hello, people! There's still lingering an interesting regression where the > internal keyboard of various older LG laptops is dead. It is tracked here: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589

checkpatch: GIT_COMMIT_ID rule catches 'cherry picked from commit ' lines

2015-11-25 Thread Shawn N
Hello, The checkpatch.pl GIT_COMMIT_ID rule appears to be designed to enforce a minimum description when citing patches: 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> (\"\")'. One (unintended?) consequence of this rule is that unmodified 'cherry picked from commit ' (git cherry-pick -x) lines are flagged. - Is the

no connectivity on PF with Intel 82599/SR-IOV/OVS

2014-12-01 Thread Dmitry N.
Hello all. I'm having an issue with SR-IOV on 82599 NIC in lab env. Basically what I have is Ubuntu 12.04 with a set of vanilla kernels and Open vSwitch. A simplified scheme for ovs setup: br-mgmt -> [vlan 102]br-eth0 -> eth0 -> fabric When VFs are disabled, connectivity works fine. However when

Re: brcmsmac not compliant to 802.11 for BCM4313

2015-03-05 Thread Nikita N.
owed: 4) Has been done any step so far, to root the cause of this issue? 5) Since I have spent money&time on that device, I would like at least to monitor the work in progress done to root the cause of this issue - how can I? Thanks & Greetings On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, at 10:01 AM, Arend van Sp

Re: brcmsmac not compliant to 802.11 for BCM4313

2015-03-05 Thread Nikita N.
on kernel.org. Sure will do. As soon as someone from Broadcom QA Testing Team, will find that the root cause of that issue depends on Linux kernel. I guess I already did my best to try debugging and solving for *free* a Broadcom issue which: 1) doesn't depend on me, 2) is locked down in a pro

brcmsmac not compliant to 802.11 for BCM4313

2015-03-04 Thread Nikita N.
ave been searching for any technical datasheet specification document about BCM4313 on Broadcom website and others. Did not find any. Could you please send me a detailed technical datasheet specification document about BCM4313, for programming/dev purposes? Thank you & Greetings On Tue, Feb 17,

brcmsmac: TX power blocked in BCM4313

2015-02-16 Thread Nikita N.
ower_offsets in the table and call wlc_lcnphy_set_target_tx_pwr=40, to get a TX power less that 19dbm? 4) if it was not correct, or partially correct, what am I missing or doing wrong, in order to push the TX transceiver power less than 19dbm? Thanks for your attention. -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.co

Re: brcmsmac: TX power blocked in BCM4313

2015-02-16 Thread Nikita N.
actory support towards Linux community, and the unsatisfactory Customers care. Thanks for your attention. -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 07:45 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 02/16/15 14:53, Nikita N. wrote: > > Hi Dear brcmsmac Devs, > >

Re: brcmsmac: TX power blocked in BCM4313

2015-02-17 Thread Nikita N.
Hi Arend, > brcmsmac does assure tx power is within regulatory limits by enforcing a > world regulatory domain. So what is not supported is modifying tx power > settings through user-space. Yes, I believe that could be right, *a* world regulatory domain looks indeed enforced, the USA one only,

(( U.N.O/W.B.O/09/16/82/05/9 ))

2016-04-25 Thread U / N
United Nations Compensation Unit Code.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

Re: commit 0b5da8d: fuse: add support for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA in lseek

2016-11-16 Thread Ravishankar N
Hi Nikolaus, On 11/17/2016 01:39 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: Hi Ravishankar, In commit 0b5da8d you added support for a new FUSE_LSEEK operation. However, as far as I can tell the corresponding userspace code never landed in libfuse. Do you have a corresponding patch for libfuse? No, unfortunatel

Reimbursement Payment of USD1.5M Approved, Email: (help.andyo...@gmail.com)

2016-11-02 Thread U / N

Reimbursement Payment of USD1.5M Approved, Email: (help.andyo...@gmail.com)

2016-11-02 Thread U / N
Congratulations Beneficiary, You a recipient of USD1.5M Yours Faithfully, Mr. Wu Hongbo Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs

[RT][3.10.81-rt88] Build error in 'setup_clkevents' with 3.10.81-rt88 and vanilla kernel 3.10.81

2015-06-25 Thread Sreejith N
Getting build error with 3.10.81-rt88 and vanilla kernel 3.10.81 in below line, ./drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c:195: timer_clock = clk32k_divisor_idx; Below kernel config enabled: CONFIG_ATMEL_TCLIB=y CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC=y CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC_BLOCK=0 CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y Compil

RE: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split be_hw_params_fixup function

2020-06-29 Thread N, Harshapriya
params is just a copy of an internal structure and is not > embedded into struct snd_soc_dpcm thus we cannot use > container_of() on it. addressing it below to keep the context > > Best regards, > Lukasz > > pon., 29 cze 2020 o 18:51 N, Harshapriya > napisał(a): > > &

RE: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: boards: eve: Fix DMIC records zero

2020-07-23 Thread N, Harshapriya
*id, > > + struct clk **clk) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + if (!clk) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + *clk = devm_clk_get(dev, id); > > + if (IS_ERR(*clk)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(*clk); > > +

RE: [PATCH v5] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Fix kabylake_ssp_fixup function

2020-07-16 Thread N, Harshapriya
> > > On 7/7/20 3:34 AM, Lukasz Majczak wrote: > > Fix kabylake_ssp_fixup function to distinguish codecs DAIs by names, > > as current approach, leads to crash while trying to get snd_soc_dpcm > > with > > container_of() macro in kabylake_ssp_fixup(). > > The crash call path looks as below: > >

RE: [PATCH v6] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Fix kabylake_ssp_fixup function

2020-07-16 Thread N, Harshapriya
> > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927.c > > b/sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927.c > > index 584e4f9cedc2..b261b1c466a8 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max989

RE: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split be_hw_params_fixup function

2020-07-01 Thread N, Harshapriya
> > > > For speakers and headsets its 48Khz, 2 ch and 24 bit and this > > > setting is done based on the front-end dai For speakers, however > > > support only > > > 16 bit, so we set it back to 16 bit If the front end dai is dmic, > > > then the channel > > is set to either 2 or 4 dmic_constraint

RE: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split be_hw_params_fixup function

2020-07-01 Thread N, Harshapriya
> >> > For speakers and headsets its 48Khz, 2 ch and 24 bit and this > setting is done based on the front-end dai For speakers, however > support only > 16 bit, so we set it back to 16 bit If the front end dai is dmic, > then the channel > >>> is set to either 2 or 4 dmic_c

RE: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split be_hw_params_fixup function

2020-06-29 Thread N, Harshapriya
> -Original Message- > From: Łukasz Majczak > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 4:11 AM > To: N, Harshapriya > Cc: alsa-de...@alsa-project.org; Pierre-Louis Bossart louis.boss...@linux.intel.com>; Jie Yang ; Radoslaw > Biernacki ; Ross Zwisler ; linux- > ker...@vger.k

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-09-19 Thread Shawn N
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > On 08/09/17 21:50, Brian Norris wrote: > > From: Shawn Nematbakhsh > > > > pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had > > one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back > > ca

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-09-19 Thread Shawn N
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > > On 19/09/17 15:09, Shawn N wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> Hi Brian, >>> >>> On 08/09/17 21:50, Brian Norris wrote: >>>> From: Shawn Nema

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-10-10 Thread Shawn N
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 26/09/17 00:15, Shawn N wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Shawn N wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Brian Norris >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On T

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-09-25 Thread Shawn N
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Shawn N wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Brian Norris > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:05:38PM -0700, Shawn N wrote: >>> This is failing because our EC_CMD_GET_PROTOCOL_INFO host command is >>>

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-09-19 Thread Shawn N
ION is rev'd). Anyway, we need to figure out what is happening with our EC_HOST_REQUEST_VERSION host command. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On 19/09/17 15:09, Shawn N wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Use proper protocol transfer function

2017-09-20 Thread Shawn N
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:05:38PM -0700, Shawn N wrote: >> This is failing because our EC_CMD_GET_PROTOCOL_INFO host command is >> getting messed up, or the reply buffer is getting corrupted somehow. >&g

[PATCH] spi: spidev: add exclusive bus access lock via ioctls

2017-08-12 Thread Vikram N
shares the spi bus. This becomes even harder if we don't have access to the source code of the application which is using the spi channel. Signed-off-by: Vikram N --- drivers/spi/spidev.c| 14 +- include/uapi/linux/spi/spidev.h |4 +++- 2 files changed, 16 inser

[PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fix modifying platform resource data

2016-09-30 Thread Vikram N
. Signed-off-by: Vikram N --- drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c index d5157b2..3567e1d 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the net-next tree

2012-11-27 Thread Mugunthan V N
as necessary (no action is required). Stephen Rothwell The fix is correct and I have tested CPSW from linux-next. Regards Mugunthan V N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http

Re: [PATCH] ixp4xx_eth: set the device dma_coherent_mask

2013-03-19 Thread Mugunthan V N
r device file. But this approach is obsolete now, need to think of how it can be resolved in DT approach Regards Mugunthan V N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://

Re: [BUGFIX PATCH] net: ethernet: cpsw: fix erroneous condition in error check

2013-03-21 Thread Mugunthan V N
igned-off-by: Lothar Waßmann Acked-by: Mugunthan V N Regards Mugunthan V N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] uretprobes/ppc: Hijack return address

2013-04-03 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:00:34PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote: > Hijack the return address and replace it with a trampoline address. > PowerPC implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h | 1

Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] uretprobes: Return uprobes implementation

2013-04-03 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:45:52PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/03, Anton Arapov wrote: ... > Looks fine to me. I am going to add this to > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/oleg/misc uprobes/core > > Ananth. "4/9 uretprobes/ppc" looks "obviously correct", but could you > plea

Re: [PATCH] cpsw: Fix interrupt storm among other things

2013-01-29 Thread Mugunthan V N
(+), 36 deletions(-) I have tested CPSW on AM335x EVM 1.5A with flood ping and i am not seeing any interrupt storm. Can you provide more details on how to reproduce the issue. Regards Mugunthan V N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH] cpsw: Fix interrupt storm among other things

2013-01-30 Thread Mugunthan V N
On 1/30/2013 2:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi Mugunthan, On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book interrupt handling. While at it, added a non-NAPI mode (which is easier to

Re: [PATCH] cpsw: Fix interrupt storm among other things

2013-01-30 Thread Mugunthan V N
On 1/30/2013 3:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi, On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote: On 1/30/2013 2:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi Mugunthan, On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Fix interrupt storm on bone

Re: [PATCH] cpsw: Fix interrupt storm among other things

2013-01-30 Thread Mugunthan V N
aibhav Regards -- Pantelis This is the device ID which i have [root@arago /]# devmem 0x44e10600 0x1B94402E Regards Mugunthan V N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://

Re: [PATCH] cpsw: Fix interrupt storm among other things

2013-01-30 Thread Mugunthan V N
On 1/30/2013 7:25 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi Mugunthan, On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: On 1/30/2013 7:21 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi Vaibhav, On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: Hi Antoniou, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou

Re: [PATCH] cpsw: Fix interrupt storm among other things

2013-01-30 Thread Mugunthan V N
Hi Antoniou On 1/30/2013 7:25 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi Mugunthan, On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: On 1/30/2013 7:21 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi Vaibhav, On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: Hi Antoniou, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19

Re: [PATCH -tip v2 1/2] [BUGFIX] kprobes: make hash_64() as always inlined

2013-03-14 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
f-by: Masami Hiramatsu > Reported-by: Timo Juhani Lindfors > Cc: "David S. Miller" > Cc: Nadia Yvette Chambers > Cc: Pavel Emelyanov > Cc: Jiri Kosina > Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Linus Torvalds Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli

Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/2] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Check Interrupt Flag modifier when registering probe

2013-03-14 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
registering probe > and store the result on ainsn->if_modifier. > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu > Reported-by: Timo Juhani Lindfors > Cc: "David S. Miller" > Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: "H.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE boot flags into a structure

2012-08-27 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 08/27/2012 07:48 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:58:59PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:55:03PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Many MCE boot flags are boolean in nature, but are declared as integers currently. We can pack these into a bitfield to save

Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE boot flags into a structure

2012-08-28 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 08/28/2012 01:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:44:40PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Looks good. Infact, I had actually added mce_ser and mce_disabled into the bitfield, but backed off not wanting to overdo. We could pull in all the other configuration parameters into

Re: [PATCH v3] Hardware breakpoints: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabled

2012-08-28 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 08/16/2012 01:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 20:42 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:07:01PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Hi Frederick, Did you get a chance to take a look at this? Regards, Naveen Yeah, I'm ok with the patch. Peter, ar

[PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the per-cpu location

2012-08-29 Thread Naveen N. Rao
need to be updated to use the new path. However, if we ever get to a point where cpu0 can be offlined, these tools will need to be updated anyway (as they mostly hardcode machinecheck0 currently) Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 46 ++-

Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the per-cpu location

2012-08-29 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 08/29/2012 03:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:11:55PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: All the MCE attributes currently exported via sysfs appear under /sys/devices/system/machinecheck/machinecheck/. Pretty much all of these are global in nature and not specific to a

Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the per-cpu location

2012-08-29 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 08/29/2012 04:10 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:56:04PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Hmmm.. Can't we just deprecate these? ;) Perhaps we can consider adding newer tunables in the right place. In case you haven't noticed yet: I'm all on your side. Yu

Re: [PATCH v3] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step

2012-08-30 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 07:37:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > Ehm. Is there anything I missed to do? Or are you speculating on > > > changes which will clash with these here? > > > > If we have task_set_blockstep(), then perhaps it mmakes sense to > > avo

Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the per-cpu location

2012-08-30 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 08/29/2012 08:13 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: Note: I'm not sure if it's ok to change sysfs entries and this does break userspace tools that depend on the current path for some of these attributes. So, they will need to be updated to use the new path. However, if we ever get to a point where cpu0 can

Re: [PATCH v3] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step

2012-08-30 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/30, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 07:37:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > Ananth, Sebastian, what if we start with the patch below? Then &g

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc

2012-09-04 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:26:59PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 13:01 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > > > > This is the port of uprobes to powerpc. Usage is similar to x86. > > Guys, ca

[PATCH 0/3] x86:mce: Some cleanups and bios-set CMCI thresholds

2012-09-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
op of -tip. Thanks, Naveen --- Naveen N. Rao (3): x86/mce: Make sysfs tunables available globally across all cpus x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE flags into a structure x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt |5 + Documentation/x86/x

[PATCH 2/3] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE flags into a structure

2012-09-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
Many MCE flags are boolean in nature, but are declared as integers currently. We can pack these into a bitfield to save some space. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h|2 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h |9 +++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu

[PATCH 3/3] x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold

2012-09-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
-safe, we initialize threshold to 1 if some banks have not been initialized by the bios and warn the user. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt |5 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h |3 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |

[PATCH 1/3] x86/mce: Make sysfs tunables available globally across all cpus

2012-09-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
documentation to also point to the new location so that user-space tools can pick up on the new location. We would eventually want to remove these from the per-cpu location. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- Documentation/x86/x86_64/machinecheck |4 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 24

[PATCH] [mcelog] Start using the new sysfs tunables location

2012-09-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
All the current mce tunables are now available under /sys/devices/system/machinecheck. Start using this new location, but fall back to the older per-cpu location so that we continue working with older kernels. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- README |2 +- mcelog.init |5

[PATCH v2] x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold

2012-09-10 Thread Naveen N. Rao
-safe, we initialize threshold to 1 if some banks have not been initialized by the bios and warn the user. v2: Just separating out the patch. I will send a separate patch for consolidating the MCE boot flags. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt |5

[PATCH v3] x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold

2012-09-12 Thread Naveen N. Rao
-safe, we initialize threshold to 1 if some banks have not been initialized by the bios and warn the user. v3: Updated messages as per Tony's inputs. v2: Just separating out the patch. I will send a separate patch for consolidating the MCE boot flags. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- Documen

[PATCH 1/2] Kprobes: Indicate kretprobe support in Kconfig

2008-02-04 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds CONFIG_HAVE_KRETPROBES to the arch//Kconfig file for relevant architectures with kprobes support. This facilitates easy handling of in-kernel modules (like samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c) that depend on kretprobes

[PATCH 2/2] Kprobes: Move kprobes examples to samples/

2008-02-04 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Move kprobes examples from Documentation/kprobes.txt to under samples/. Patch originally by Randy Dunlap. o Updated the patch to apply on 2.6.24-mm1 o Modified examples code to build on multiple architectures. Currently, the example

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Kprobes: Move kprobes examples to samples/ - updated

2008-02-04 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:06:22AM +0530, Abhishek Sagar wrote: > On 2/5/08, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + * Build and insert the kernel module as done in the kprobe example. > > + * You will see the trace data in /var/log/mes

Re: [PATCH 6/9] uprobes: flush cache after xol write

2012-10-25 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 10/16, Rabin Vincent wrote: > > > > 2012/10/15 Oleg Nesterov : > > > On 10/14, Rabin Vincent wrote: > > >> Flush the cache so that the instructions written to the XOL area are > > >> visible. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vinc

Re: [PATCH 8/8] Move RODATA and NX tests to tests/

2008-02-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:42:05PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Move RODATA and NX testcases to tests/ > > i'm not sure

[PATCH 7/8] Move backtrace tests to tests/

2008-02-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Move backtrace selftests to tests/ Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/backtracetest.c | 48 kernel/Makefile|1 - lib/K

[PATCH 5/8] Move lkdtm to tests/

2008-02-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Move the lkdtm infrastructure to tests/ Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Ankita Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/misc/lkdtm.c | 345 --

[PATCH 4/8] Move rtmutex-tests to tests/

2008-02-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Move the rtmutex-tester infrastructure to tests/ Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/rtmutex-tester.c | 442 kernel/Makefile

[PATCH 1/8] Create tests/ directory

2008-02-11 Thread Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Create a toplevel tests/ directory to house in-kernel subsystem specific tests. Thanks to Sam Ravnborg for the Makefile corrections. Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >