);
05:02:12^
05:02:12 cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
05:02:12 make[3]: *** [drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.o] Error 1
05:02:12 make[2]: *** [drivers/pinctrl] Error 2
Best regards
Naresh kamboju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
t
Hi Olof,
I will give you Kernel head commit ID of linux-next.
Thanks for the feedback.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
On 18 June 2013 22:33, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> linux-next br
(); /* never returns */
...
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ping
On 23 June 2013 13:53, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> panda build broken on linux-next branch
>
> kernel_config=omap2plus_defconfig
> KERNEL_VERSION=3.10.0-rc6
> KERNEL_GIT=git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-nex
Hi Kevin,
On 26 June 2013 03:12, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Naresh Kamboju writes:
>
>> ping
>
> This is a known issue[1] and already has some proposed fixes, they are just
> not merged yet.
>
> Kevin
>
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-ker
Ping.
On 17 April 2013 21:16, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
>> On 12 April 2013 04:07, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> Hey it works. Didn't see this before I fixed it tho :-)
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&
u32 debug_address;
99
Kernel Commit id:
--
484eecb3dc4d7173015feeb41e2995bbcb724523
Please let me know if you need more info.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On 12 April 2013 04:07, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
>
>> One of those ARM targets is Snowball. Snowball build broken log can be found
>> here
>>
>> Build Error:
>>
>> 04:48:08 CC drivers/mfd/
On 7 September 2017 at 14:50, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:19 AM, naresh.kamb...@linaro.org wrote:
>>
>> From: Naresh Kamboju
>>
>> on ARM and ARM64 devices kernel source tree is not available so
>> insmod "$SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" is not
On 7 September 2017 at 14:46, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:19 AM, naresh.kamb...@linaro.org wrote:
>>
>> From: Naresh Kamboju
>>
>> The test script works when kernel source and build module test_bpf.ko
>> present on the machine. This patch will che
From: Naresh Kamboju
Adding new functionality check_prereqs() to check test must be run as root
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju
---
tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram.sh | 12
tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram01.sh | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram02.sh | 1 +
tools
From: Naresh Kamboju
Do not override run_tests, The default rule will just run TEST_PROGS
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju
---
tools/testing/selftests/zram/Makefile | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/zram/Makefile
b/tools/testing/selftests/zram
On 28 August 2015 at 03:42, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 12:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 08/18/2015 01:01 AM, naresh.kamb...@linaro.org wrote:
>>> From: Naresh Kamboju
>>>
>>> zram: Compressed RAM based block devices
>>> ---
On 31 August 2015 at 09:37, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 12:31 +0530, naresh.kamb...@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Naresh Kamboju
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/zram/Makefile
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/zram/Makefile
>> new file mode
> I've pushed out -rc2 releases for all of these with that patch removed.
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
Summary
kernel: 4.14.60-rc2
git repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux
On 2 August 2018 at 12:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 12:27:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 1 August 2018 at 22:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.12 release.
>> > The
On 2 August 2018 at 12:29, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 1 August 2018 at 22:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.117 release.
>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.
On 4 August 2018 at 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.13 release.
> There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 4 August 2018 at 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.61 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 4 August 2018 at 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.118 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 4 August 2018 at 14:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.146 release.
> There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.14 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.62 release.
> There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 8 August 2018 at 00:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.119 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 8 August 2018 at 00:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.147 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 24 June 2018 at 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.110 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
naro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
Test case link,
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mov_ss_trap.c?h=linux-4.17.y
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
On 24 June 2018 at 20:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.3 release.
> There are 70 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 24 June 2018 at 20:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> NOTE: This will be the last 4.16.y release. After this release, this
> tree will be end-of-life. You should have moved to the 4.17.y tree by
> now.
>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the
On 24 June 2018 at 20:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.52 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
>> Kselftest test case mov_ss_trap_64 is causing kernel panic on
>> qemu-system-x86_64 and PASS on real x86_64 hardware.
>>
>> [RUN] MOV SS; CSx14 INT3
>> [ 762.263790] PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0
>> [ 762.265169] CPU: 2 PID: 3380 Comm: mov_ss_trap_64 Not tainted 4.17.3-rc1
>> #1
>> [
>> This looks like a quemu bug, not a kernel issue, so did you tell the
>> qemu developers about this?
>
> Thanks for confirming this is not a kernel bug.
> I will report this bug to qemu developer mailing list.
Reported QEMU bug on launchpad,
Bug id #1778473.
- Naresh
On 26 August 2018 at 12:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.153 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 21 August 2018 at 11:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.151 release.
> There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 21 August 2018 at 11:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.123 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 21 August 2018 at 11:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.4 release.
> There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 21 August 2018 at 11:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.18 release.
> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 21 August 2018 at 11:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.66 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 23 August 2018 at 13:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.5 release.
> There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 23 August 2018 at 13:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> NOTE, this is going to be the LAST 4.17.y kernel release. Please move
> to the 4.18.y tree at this point in time if you have not already. After
> this release, 4.17.y will be end-of-life.
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for
On 23 August 2018 at 13:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.67 release.
> There are 217 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respon
On 23 August 2018 at 13:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.124 release.
> There are 130 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respon
On 23 August 2018 at 13:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.152 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 27 July 2018 at 15:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.11 release.
> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 27 July 2018 at 15:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.116 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 27 July 2018 at 15:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.59 release.
> There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 27 July 2018 at 15:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.145 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 18 July 2018 at 20:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.142 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 20 July 2018 at 17:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.114 release.
> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 20 July 2018 at 17:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.143 release.
> There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 20 July 2018 at 17:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.9 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 20 July 2018 at 17:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.57 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 1 August 2018 at 22:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.60 release.
> There are 246 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 1 August 2018 at 22:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.12 release.
> There are 336 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 1 August 2018 at 22:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.117 release.
> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 23 July 2018 at 17:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.10 release.
> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 23 July 2018 at 17:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.58 release.
> There are 44 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 23 July 2018 at 17:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.115 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14,
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 980, skip: 124
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
llaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
p-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 9, skip: 1
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 1016, skip: 116
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
borate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14,
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 124, pass: 980,
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
1
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 9
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4
* ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 116, pass: 1016
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
^
> CFLAGS is not used during the compile step, so the system instead of
> kernel headers are used. Fix this by using lib.mk's compile rules and
> remove CFLAGS from the linking step.
>
> Reported-by: Lei Yang
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboj
e 2.6.16.
> Thus new architectures in the kernel, such as arm64, don't implement
> these legacy syscalls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
Thanks for the patch Anders.
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file
ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 116, pass: 1016,
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
: 14,
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 980, skip: 124
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
On 5 January 2018 at 11:08, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This tests that the vsyscall entries do what they're expected to do.
> It also confirms that attempts to read the vsyscall page behave as
> expected.
>
> If changes are made to the vsyscall code or its memory map handling,
> running this test in
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju
On 16 January 2018 at 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:03:06PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release.
>> > There are 96 patches in this serie
On 16 January 2018 at 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:59:18PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.112 release.
>> > There are 87 patches in this seri
On 10 March 2018 at 05:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.87 release.
> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 10 March 2018 at 05:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.9 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12 March 2018 at 12:32, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 10 March 2018 at 05:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.87 release.
>> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.
On 12 March 2018 at 12:40, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 10 March 2018 at 05:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.9 release.
>> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.
On 10 March 2018 at 05:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.26 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 12 March 2018 at 15:02, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 12 March 2018 at 12:32, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 10 March 2018 at 05:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.87 release.
>>> There are 65 patches in t
On 12 March 2018 at 12:32, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 10 March 2018 at 05:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.87 release.
>> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.
On 10 March 2018 at 05:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.121 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 12 March 2018 at 17:56, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't find the exact mail corresponding to the patch merged in v4.16-rc5
> but commit 864b75f9d6b01 "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone
> pageblock alignment"
> cause boot hang on my ARM64 platform.
I have also noticed this problem on
On 12 March 2018 at 22:21, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Naresh Kamboju
> wrote:
>> On 12 March 2018 at 17:56, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I couldn't find the exact mail corresponding to the patch merged in
&g
On 23 March 2018 at 22:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:52:45PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 23 March 2018 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.13 release.
>> > Th
On 23 March 2018 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.30 release.
> There are 77 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
>> Partial results, build only.
>>
>> Build results:
>> total: 145 pass: 143 fail: 2
>> Failed builds:
>> arm:allmodconfig
>> arm64:allmodconfig
>>
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c:570:14: error: implicit declaration of function
>> ‘devm_rtc_allocate_device'
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c:
On 6 April 2018 at 18:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.16 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 6 April 2018 at 18:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.127 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 6 April 2018 at 18:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.1 release.
> There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
>>
>> Summary
>>
>>
>> kernel: 4.16.1-rc1
>> git repo:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> git branc
On 12 April 2018 at 00:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.94 release.
> There are 310 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 12 April 2018 at 00:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.128 release.
> There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Respons
On 20 March 2018 at 02:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.12 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 20 March 2018 at 02:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.29 release.
> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
On 20 March 2018 at 15:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.89 release.
>> There are 241 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone ha
On 20 March 2018 at 13:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.123 release.
>> There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone h
On 21 March 2018 at 19:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:49:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 11:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 03:48:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> [...]
>>
On 21 March 2018 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:49:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.89 release.
>> > There are 241 patches in
On 21 March 2018 at 18:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:50:12AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.123 release.
>> > There are 134 patches in
On 22 March 2018 at 13:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:20:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 21 March 2018 at 19:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:49:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> >> On
On 23 March 2018 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.13 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Response
1 - 100 of 1470 matches
Mail list logo
