Re: No 100 HZ timer !

Alan Cox wrote: > > > Timers more precise than 100HZ aren't probably needed - as MIN_RTO is 0.2s > > and MIN_DELACK is 0.04s, TCP would hardly benefit from them. > > There are a considerable number of people who really do need 1Khz resolution. > Midi is one of the example cases. That doesn't mea

Jiffy question and sound.

re important to watch for when moving 2.2.x drivers to 2.4.x? Thanks Watermodem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Jiffy question and sound.

Matti Aarnio wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:20:47AM -0600, watermodem wrote: > > With the 2.4.0 kernel the loops_per_sec field was replaced (for i386) > > with current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy. > ... > > #define LOOPS_PER_SEC current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * 1

Re: Jiffy question and sound.

watermodem wrote: > > Matti Aarnio wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:20:47AM -0600, watermodem wrote: > > > With the 2.4.0 kernel the loops_per_sec field was replaced (for i386) > > > with current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy.

Re: temperature standard - global config option?

FLAME Protection ON WARNING -- Do not read if you are humor impaired. Euro-centric here? The US is mm/dd/yy or mm/dd/ Many countries/religions/peoples have different base years, and calendars... It happens to have a US format in the current kernel... so what... Convert it in

Re: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregistertable

Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, watermodem wrote: > > > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > > > > George Bonser writes: > > > > There is, of course, one basic problem with that argument. While you can say > > > > (a

Re: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself.

Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Do they include the source? There's a CD of source that you can buy > > > for $20 but gcc isn't listed > > > > I'm not sure if they are allowed to do that. See clause 1 (c): > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdn-files/027/001/516/eula_mit.htm > Minor note: 1) The

Re: What are the VM motivations??

Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Jason McMullan wrote: > > > Or heck, let's just make the VM a _real_ Neural Network, > > that self trains itself to the load you put on the system. > > Hideously complex and evil? > > Considering the amount of parameters the neural network > wo

Re: Help: kernel-2.4.4 and iptables: Error?

Zack Brown wrote: > > Can someone help this guy? > > -- > Zack Brown > > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Phillipus Gunawan wrote: > > > I'm having problem with iptables... > > I just upgrade my kernel from 2.2.16 to 2.4.3 > > I also upgrade the iptables with: iptables-1.2.1a-1.i386.rpm > > After the insta