Hi everyone
04.03.2014, 00:39, "David Miller" :
> From: Alexey Khoroshilov
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 00:00:56 +0400
>
>> There were a couple of patches fixing the same bug that
>> results in duplicated err = 0; assignment.
>> The patch removes one of them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshil
Hi
14.02.2014, 02:05, "Uwe Kleine-König" :
> of_get_gpio() might return -EPROBE_DEFER meaning that the driver
> providing the gpio isn't ready yet. If that happens for the first gpio
> the resulting kernel output without this patch is:
>
> w1-gpio somename: Failed to parse DT
> pla
Hi everyone
07.05.2014, 03:49, "David Fries" :
> Acked-by: David Fries
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 01:26:04AM +0400, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>
>> w1_process_callbacks() expects to be called with dev->list_mutex held,
>> but it is the fact only in w1_process(). __w1_remove_master_device()
>>
Hi
04.02.2014, 09:51, "David Fries" :
> Help me understand what the protocol is supposed to be. Assuming
> there aren't any errors, is there supposed to be a
> w1_netlink_send_error generated reply per netlink packet (cn_msg), per
> w1_netlink_msg, or per w1_netlink_cmd?
reply should be sent per
Hi
07.02.2014, 10:00, "David Fries" :
> Here's a patch to implement that. Is this what you have in mind?
>
> From 4ed65d81b0121a8c191a9833d041484e9097198b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Fries
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:45:05 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] w1: correct cn_msg ack, no change or
08.02.2014, 02:25, "David Fries" :
>> Can you also check that protocol documentation is correct?
>
> Documentation/connector/connector.txt ? I found it a little unclear,
> I'll see what I can do.
No, I meant Documentation/w1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
6 matches
Mail list logo