Re: [PATCH] connector: remove duplicated code in cn_call_callback()

2014-03-03 Thread zbr
Hi everyone 04.03.2014, 00:39, "David Miller" : > From: Alexey Khoroshilov > Date: Sun,  2 Mar 2014 00:00:56 +0400 > >>  There were a couple of patches fixing the same bug that >>  results in duplicated err = 0; assignment. >>  The patch removes one of them. >> >>  Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshil

Re: [PATCH] w1-gpio: handle of_get_gpio() returning -EPROBE_DEFER better

2014-02-17 Thread zbr
Hi 14.02.2014, 02:05, "Uwe Kleine-König" : > of_get_gpio() might return -EPROBE_DEFER meaning that the driver > providing the gpio isn't ready yet. If that happens for the first gpio > the resulting kernel output without this patch is: > > w1-gpio somename: Failed to parse DT > pla

Re: [PATCH v2] w1: do not unlock unheld list_mutex in __w1_remove_master_device()

2014-05-06 Thread zbr
Hi everyone 07.05.2014, 03:49, "David Fries" : > Acked-by: David Fries > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 01:26:04AM +0400, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote: > >>  w1_process_callbacks() expects to be called with dev->list_mutex held, >>  but it is the fact only in w1_process(). __w1_remove_master_device() >>  

Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: refcnt fix, skip non-error send, docs

2014-02-04 Thread zbr
Hi 04.02.2014, 09:51, "David Fries" : > Help me understand what the protocol is supposed to be.  Assuming > there aren't any errors, is there supposed to be a > w1_netlink_send_error generated reply per netlink packet (cn_msg), per > w1_netlink_msg, or per w1_netlink_cmd? reply should be sent per

Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: refcnt fix, skip non-error send, docs

2014-02-07 Thread zbr
Hi 07.02.2014, 10:00, "David Fries" : > Here's a patch to implement that.  Is this what you have in mind? > > From 4ed65d81b0121a8c191a9833d041484e9097198b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: David Fries > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:45:05 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH] w1: correct cn_msg ack, no change or

Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: refcnt fix, skip non-error send, docs

2014-02-07 Thread zbr
08.02.2014, 02:25, "David Fries" : >>  Can you also check that protocol documentation is correct? > > Documentation/connector/connector.txt ?  I found it a little unclear, > I'll see what I can do. No, I meant Documentation/w1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k