On 3/22/21 6:20 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:58 PM Ben Greear wrote:
On 7/22/20 6:00 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2020-07-22 14:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
I'm considering testing a different approach (with mt76
realized I'm running Felix's patch since his mt76
driver needs it. Any chance it will go upstream?
Thanks,
Ben
- Felix
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 12/17/20 2:24 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:23:33AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/15/20 9:21 AM, Youghandhar Chintala wrote:
From: Rakesh Pillai
Currently in case of target hardware restart ,we just reconfig and
re-enable the security keys and enable the network
/drivers that *can* support seamless
restarts?
If not, then just could always enable this feature in mac80211?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
4/0xb0
[2.531065] #2
[0.624831] __common_interrupt: 2.55 No irq handler for vector
[2.542389] #3
[0.624831] __common_interrupt: 3.55 No irq handler for vector
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 9/21/20 12:50 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello,
I'm seeing this build failure, any idea what is the issue? I've cleared my
ccache (ccache --clear)
but that did not help. A pull from this morning builds on Fedora-29 with same
.config file. I tried
that same commit on my F32 system
nus/Makefile:1198: prepare0] Error 2
make: *** [/home/greearb/git/linux-linus/Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
er debug
compiled
in) since it seems this stuff would be rarely used and it adds method calls to
hot
paths.
That is a decision for Kalle though, so see what he says...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 06/27/2020 10:12 PM, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ben Greear
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 8:58 PM
To: Rakesh Pillai ; ath...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add history
Enable
- IRQ Disable
- NAPI poll
- CE service
- WMI cmd
- WMI event
- WMI tx completion
This will help in debugging any crash or any
improper behaviour.
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH, >dev_flags)) {
Don't you mean !test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH, >dev_flags)) ???
Or maybe I'm just mis-reading your patch?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
program to allow automatic
reboot
of the system soon after this event is seen, for instance.
Could you post your devlink RFC patches somewhere public?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
experience with ath10k-ct, the OS normally recovers
fine
from firmware crashes. ath10k already reports full crash reports on udev, so
easy for user-space to notice and report bug reports upstream if it cares to.
Probably
other NICs do the same, and if not, they certainly could.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greea
On 05/18/2020 10:09 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:58:53AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 05/18/2020 09:51 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 03:24:01PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 21:28 +, Luis Chamberlain wrote
sten for udev events (I think that is the right term),
and find crashes that way. You get the actual crash info as well.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
similarly.
Seems like upstream ath10k could really benefit from having some test beds
so you can actually test code on different chips and have confidence
in your changes!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 09/11/2019 06:21 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:03 PM Ben Greear wrote:
Out of curiosity, I'm interested to know what ath10k NIC chipset this is from.
It's a Dell XPS 13 9380, with
02:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac
Wireless Network
10k firmware crashes,
but it
seems to not be a big deal and the system normally recovers fine.
Out of curiosity, I'm interested to know what ath10k NIC chipset this is from.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 1/7/19 9:57 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
On 12/31/18 8:22 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/21/2018 05:17 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
If you don't worry about security and performance is paramount, then
boot with "nospectre_v2". That's explained in the document.
There seem to be lots of differen
On 12/21/2018 05:17 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
On 12/21/18 1:59 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/21/18 9:44 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
Thomas,
Andi and I have made an update to our draft of the Spectre admin guide.
We may be out on Christmas vacation for a while. But we want to
send it out for everyone
anything
beyond negligible performance impact for those running systems where performance
is more important than security?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
is no
longer
valid. Can someone let me know what patch fixes this crash so I can apply it
while
bisecting?
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg17809.html
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
is no
longer
valid. Can someone let me know what patch fixes this crash so I can apply it
while
bisecting?
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg17809.html
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
hat might be something to consider.
Right now I don't see the point of handling packets that don't cross
network namespace boundaries specially, other than to preserve backwards
compatibility.
Well, backwards compat is a big deal all by itself!
Thanks,
Ben
Eric
--
Ben Greear <gree...@can
hat might be something to consider.
Right now I don't see the point of handling packets that don't cross
network namespace boundaries specially, other than to preserve backwards
compatibility.
Well, backwards compat is a big deal all by itself!
Thanks,
Ben
Eric
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technol
allow someone to call napi_disable multiple times w/out deadlocking.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
eadlocking.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 02/09/2017 11:03 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> writes:
On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> writes:
Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in
FreeBSD is a different
On 02/09/2017 11:03 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Ben Greear writes:
On 02/07/2017 01:14 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Adrian Chadd writes:
Removing this method makes the diff to FreeBSD larger, as "vif" in
FreeBSD is a different pointer.
(Yes, I have ath10k on freebsd working and I'd li
it more difficult for Adrian and makes the code no easier to read
for the rest of us?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
rian and makes the code no easier to read
for the rest of us?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
actually expect performance regressions? I'll be complaining if
so, but will test first :)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
egressions? I'll be complaining if
so, but will test first :)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 09/28/2016 02:11 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Ben Greear wrote:
I have been running this patch for a while:
ath10k: Use GPF_DMA32 for firmware swap memory.
This fixes OS crash when using QCA 9984 NIC on x86-64 system
without vt-d enabled.
Also tested
On 09/28/2016 02:11 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Ben Greear wrote:
I have been running this patch for a while:
ath10k: Use GPF_DMA32 for firmware swap memory.
This fixes OS crash when using QCA 9984 NIC on x86-64 system
without vt-d enabled.
Also tested
.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
index e20aa39..727b3aa 100644
@@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_alloc_chunk(struct ath10k *ar, u32
req_id,
if (!poo
.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
index e20aa39..727b3aa 100644
@@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_alloc_chunk(struct ath10k *ar, u32
req_id,
if (!pool_size)
return -EINVAL
to that source.
Why are you so concerned about the warning anyway?
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
On 06/08/2016 08:46 AM, Prasun Maiti wrote:
Please tell me if I mention that this code is untested in commit log,
then could you
to that source.
Why are you so concerned about the warning anyway?
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 06/08/2016 08:46 AM, Prasun Maiti wrote:
Please tell me if I mention that this code is untested in commit log,
then could you check the code kindly and also help
some special cases it might be ok to send
untested code but even then it needs to be clearly stated in the commit
log that it's untested.
Please resend once you have tested this, I'm dropping this now.
--
Kalle Valo
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
en then it needs to be clearly stated in the commit
log that it's untested.
Please resend once you have tested this, I'm dropping this now.
--
Kalle Valo
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 05/13/2016 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700
How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?
I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work up
On 05/13/2016 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700
How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?
I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work upstream on and
maintain these components
Mr Miller:
How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?
Thanks,
Ben
On 04/30/2016 10:30 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:43:51PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/30/2016 03:01 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
Consider:
- App
Mr Miller:
How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?
Thanks,
Ben
On 04/30/2016 10:30 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:43:51PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/30/2016 03:01 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
Consider:
- App
On 04/30/2016 03:01 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
Good point, so if you had:
eth0 <-> raw <-> user space-bridge <-> raw <-> vethA <-> veth B <->
userspace-stub <->
On 04/30/2016 03:01 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Good point, so if you had:
eth0 <-> raw <-> user space-bridge <-> raw <-> vethA <-> veth B <->
userspace-stub <->eth1
and user-space hub enabled
On 04/30/2016 02:36 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
On 04/30/2016 02:13 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2016 1
On 04/30/2016 02:36 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/30/2016 02:13 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Ben Greear
wrote:
On 04/30/2016 12:54 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
We've put considerable effort
On 04/30/2016 02:13 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
On 04/30/2016 12:54 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
We've put considerable effort into cleaning up the checksum interface
to make it as unambiguous as possible,
On 04/30/2016 02:13 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/30/2016 12:54 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
We've put considerable effort into cleaning up the checksum interface
to make it as unambiguous as possible, please be very careful to
follow
want to send raw frames that do have
broken checksums (lets assume a real NIC, not veth), and I want them
to hit the wire with those bad checksums.
How do I configure the checksumming in this case?
Thanks,
Ben
Tom
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
want to send raw frames that do have
broken checksums (lets assume a real NIC, not veth), and I want them
to hit the wire with those bad checksums.
How do I configure the checksumming in this case?
Thanks,
Ben
Tom
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/30/2016 11:33
programs would be sufficient I think.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
programs would be sufficient I think.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 04/28/2016 03:29 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
Hello,
2016-04-27, 17:14:44 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/27/2016 05:00 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 20:07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:59 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/26/2016 04:02 PM
On 04/28/2016 03:29 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
Hello,
2016-04-27, 17:14:44 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/27/2016 05:00 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 20:07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:59 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/26/2016 04:02 PM
On 04/27/2016 05:00 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 20:07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:59 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/26/2016 04:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.80-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I
On 04/27/2016 05:00 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 20:07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:59 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/26/2016 04:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.80-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I
will cause bad checksum on forwarded packets */
- if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE &&
- rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
length = skb->len;
if (dev_forward_skb(rcv, skb) != NET_RX_SUCCESS)
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
s that
- will cause bad checksum on forwarded packets */
- if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE &&
- rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
length = skb->len;
if (dev_forward_skb
On 04/12/2016 01:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
It worked well enough for years that I didn't even know other algorithms were
available. It was broken around 4.0 time, and I reported it to the list,
and no one seemed to really care enough to do
On 04/12/2016 01:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
It worked well enough for years that I didn't even know other algorithms were
available. It was broken around 4.0 time, and I reported it to the list,
and no one seemed to really care enough to do
On 04/12/2016 01:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:11 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/12/2016 12:31 PM, Machani, Yaniv wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 18:04:52, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/12/2016 07:52 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 12:17 +, Machani, Yaniv
On 04/12/2016 01:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:11 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/12/2016 12:31 PM, Machani, Yaniv wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 18:04:52, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/12/2016 07:52 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 12:17 +, Machani, Yaniv
On 04/12/2016 12:31 PM, Machani, Yaniv wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 18:04:52, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/12/2016 07:52 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 12:17 +, Machani, Yaniv wrote:
If you are using 'Cubic' TCP congestion control, then please try
something different
On 04/12/2016 12:31 PM, Machani, Yaniv wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 18:04:52, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/12/2016 07:52 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 12:17 +, Machani, Yaniv wrote:
If you are using 'Cubic' TCP congestion control, then please try
something different
found.
If you are using 'Cubic' TCP congestion control, then please try something
different.
It was broken last I checked, at least when used with the ath10k driver.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=144405216005715=2
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologi
found.
If you are using 'Cubic' TCP congestion control, then please try something
different.
It was broken last I checked, at least when used with the ath10k driver.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=144405216005715=2
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
0x1c3
[] ? release_task+0x738/0x738
[] ? SyS_futex+0x152/0x1ee
[] ? do_futex+0xb4d/0xb4d
[] ? mark_held_locks+0x2d/0x90
[] ? lockdep_sys_exit+0x1a/0x91
[] ? lockdep_sys_exit_thunk+0x12/0x14
[] SyS_exit+0x1d/0x1d
[] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
1 lock held by llvmpipe-2/1356:
#0: (_threadgroup_rwsem){++}, at: []
exit_signals+0x80/0x1ef
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
0x1c3
[] ? release_task+0x738/0x738
[] ? SyS_futex+0x152/0x1ee
[] ? do_futex+0xb4d/0xb4d
[] ? mark_held_locks+0x2d/0x90
[] ? lockdep_sys_exit+0x1a/0x91
[] ? lockdep_sys_exit_thunk+0x12/0x14
[] SyS_exit+0x1d/0x1d
[] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
1 lock held by llvmpipe-2/1356:
#0: (_threadgroup_rwsem){++}, at: []
exit_signals+0x80/0x1ef
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
d!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
d!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 03/31/2016 12:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:52 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
If someone can fix rhashtable, then great.
I read some earlier comments [1] back when someone else reported
similar problems, and the comments seemed to indicate that rhashtable
was broken
On 03/31/2016 12:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:52 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
If someone can fix rhashtable, then great.
I read some earlier comments [1] back when someone else reported
similar problems, and the comments seemed to indicate that rhashtable
was broken
On 03/30/2016 09:38 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:14:12 +0200
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 09:16 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
Looks like rhashtable has too much policy in it to properly deal with
cases where there are too man
On 03/30/2016 09:38 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:14:12 +0200
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 09:16 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
Looks like rhashtable has too much policy in it to properly deal with
cases where there are too many hash collisions, so I am going
Looks like rhashtable has too much policy in it to properly deal with
cases where there are too many hash collisions, so I am going to work on
reverting it's use in mac80211.
Thanks,
Ben
On 03/28/2016 01:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello!
I have a use case for mac80211 where I create multiple
Looks like rhashtable has too much policy in it to properly deal with
cases where there are too many hash collisions, so I am going to work on
reverting it's use in mac80211.
Thanks,
Ben
On 03/28/2016 01:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello!
I have a use case for mac80211 where I create multiple
to at least function in a linear-search manner.
Any idea what I can do to get rid of the EBUSY return code problem, or how
to debug it further?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
to at least function in a linear-search manner.
Any idea what I can do to get rid of the EBUSY return code problem, or how
to debug it further?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
On 01/12/2015 12:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:08:22PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>> Any idea what is wrong?
>>
>> -rc3 compiled ok, then I rebased just now, and get this:
>>
> My auto-builders are all happy, with no build or qemu fa
arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.o
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.o
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On 01/12/2015 12:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:08:22PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
-rc3 compiled ok, then I rebased just now, and get this:
My auto-builders are all happy, with no build or qemu failures.
Did you try make mrproper prior
] [] SyS_finit_module+0x75/0xc0
[4.855049] [] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x7b/0xa0
[4.855049] [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x12
[4.855049] ---[ end trace 9ef1310c3c12d97e ]---
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
] [c04cfb25] SyS_finit_module+0x75/0xc0
[4.855049] [c053bbfb] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x7b/0xa0
[4.855049] [c0a2964c] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x12
[4.855049] ---[ end trace 9ef1310c3c12d97e ]---
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
Candela Technologies Inc http
On 07/24/2014 04:08 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> A few of our systems are repeatedly crashing when upgraded from
> the 3.14.6+ to 3.14.13+ kernels. Both kernels have a fair bit
> of our out-of-tree patches, so could be our fault.
Ahh, looks like a bad merge of a stable patch with a slightly
31 e4 4d 8b 7e 08 4c 89 e7 49 8b 37 e8 fa ec ff ff
RIP [] anon_vma_clone+0x88/0xf5
RSP
CR2: 003f9840b000
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
: 003f9840b000
--
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
On 07/24/2014 04:08 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
A few of our systems are repeatedly crashing when upgraded from
the 3.14.6+ to 3.14.13+ kernels. Both kernels have a fair bit
of our out-of-tree patches, so could be our fault.
Ahh, looks like a bad merge of a stable patch with a slightly different
Sorry, ...this and previous patch should not have gone to LKML.
Will send it over to ath10k list where it was supposed to go.
Thanks,
Ben
On 05/15/2014 11:31 AM, gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear
>
> When the driver cannot provide proper rssi, mark
Sorry, ...this and previous patch should not have gone to LKML.
Will send it over to ath10k list where it was supposed to go.
Thanks,
Ben
On 05/15/2014 11:31 AM, gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
From: Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
When the driver cannot provide proper rssi, mark
status
o enable
> that mode?
You could just force pktgen to not support multi-skb on vlan interfaces?
I thought we went through this a year or two ago and came up with
something like a 'pktgen-challenged' network interface flag?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.
' network interface flag?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On 02/26/2014 11:50 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> This is from the ath10k tree, which was recently rebased on top of
> 3.14.0-rc4.
>
> I'm getting the error below, but I cannot find any reference to 'spinlokk'
> in the source tree. The build tree has two mentions, but these are
&
]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo inf
]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On 02/26/2014 11:50 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
This is from the ath10k tree, which was recently rebased on top of
3.14.0-rc4.
I'm getting the error below, but I cannot find any reference to 'spinlokk'
in the source tree. The build tree has two mentions, but these are
auto-generated
from what
On 12/31/2013 08:09 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/30/2013 10:32 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
I'm just thinking of a programmer, e.g. changing a struct like this:
struct foo {
u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
- u16 dummy;
};
I don't know of a way to catch
1 - 100 of 478 matches
Mail list logo
