Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel?

2001-02-28 Thread Daniel Ridge
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > The Scyld system is based on BProc -- which requires only a 1K patch to > > the kernel. This patch adds 339 net lines to the kernel, and changes 38 > > existing lines. > > Well, that explains your viewpoint and your motivation. :-) I would put

Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel?

2001-02-28 Thread Daniel Ridge
Fellow Beowulfers, I have yet to hear a compelling argument about why any of them should go into the standard kernel -- let alone a particular one or a duck of a compromise. The Scyld system is based on BProc -- which requires only a 1K patch to the kernel. This patch adds 339 net lines to

Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel?

2001-02-28 Thread Daniel Ridge
Fellow Beowulfers, I have yet to hear a compelling argument about why any of them should go into the standard kernel -- let alone a particular one or a duck of a compromise. The Scyld system is based on BProc -- which requires only a 1K patch to the kernel. This patch adds 339 net lines to

Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel?

2001-02-28 Thread Daniel Ridge
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: The Scyld system is based on BProc -- which requires only a 1K patch to the kernel. This patch adds 339 net lines to the kernel, and changes 38 existing lines. Well, that explains your viewpoint and your motivation. :-) I would put this