On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 22:35, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Instead of having a blocked futex_waitv() waiting on an fd (maybe a generic
> eventfd() or a new futex2fd())
> would be a better interface?
Like bring back FUTEX_FD? (which was removed back in 2.6.25)
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 00:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> + __u8 register_op; /* IORING_RESTRICTION_REGISTER_OP */
Can you confirm that this intentionally limited the future range of
IORING_REGISTER opcodes to 0-255?
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 03:11, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 7/21/20 4:40 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:26:51PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 7/16/20 6:48 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>
Related thread (2012): https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=133897212713981=2
FreeBSD[1] chose signatures of:
int bindat(int fd, int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen);
int connectat(int fd, int s, const struct sockaddr *name,
socklen_t namelen);
An alternate implementation
Related thread (2012): https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=133897212713981=2
FreeBSD[1] chose signatures of:
int bindat(int fd, int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen);
int connectat(int fd, int s, const struct sockaddr *name,
socklen_t namelen);
An alternate implementation
5 matches
Mail list logo