On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:23:07PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> One more subtle note, for the case of error handling. There is a
> change to sendfile() in the zerocopy patches which causes sendfile()
> to act more like sendmsg() when errors occur.
How is this likely to affect applications?
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:15:24PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> : > : but once a fixed BIOS is out for your board that would be a good first step.
> : > : If it still does it then, its worth digging for kernel naughties
> : > :
> : > I don't think I have 686b southbridge. I
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:15:24PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
: : but once a fixed BIOS is out for your board that would be a good first step.
: : If it still does it then, its worth digging for kernel naughties
: :
:I don't think I have 686b southbridge. I have 686
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:23:07PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
One more subtle note, for the case of error handling. There is a
change to sendfile() in the zerocopy patches which causes sendfile()
to act more like sendmsg() when errors occur.
How is this likely to affect applications?
4 matches
Mail list logo
