hi -
when i insmod the openafs module
insmod /usr/vice/etc/modload/libafs-2.4.4.o
i get a whole bunch (50 in fact) unresolved symbols. going through
some of them, i can see that they do in fact exist. for example:
root@gone:~ > grep inode_change_ok /proc/ksyms
c013ff20
hi -
when i insmod the openafs module
insmod /usr/vice/etc/modload/libafs-2.4.4.o
i get a whole bunch (50 in fact) unresolved symbols. going through
some of them, i can see that they do in fact exist. for example:
root@gone:~ grep inode_change_ok /proc/ksyms
c013ff20
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 08:27:36PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> Unfortunately. I hope some of those key developers see this is a time to
> "Let's fix our security problems". Ie, GNOME, etc...
Think their view is mainly, "This is to be used on a desktop system, let's rely
on security
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 08:27:36PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
Unfortunately. I hope some of those key developers see this is a time to
"Let's fix our security problems". Ie, GNOME, etc...
Think their view is mainly, "This is to be used on a desktop system, let's rely
on security elsewhere."
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:51:12AM +0530, Mahadev K Cholachagudda wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I have one question:
>
> Why does the linux kernel needs GCC for compiling. ?
There are many many hacks that only work on gcc. For example, most C compilers do not
yet support 'inline functions'.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:51:12AM +0530, Mahadev K Cholachagudda wrote:
Hi to all,
I have one question:
Why does the linux kernel needs GCC for compiling. ?
There are many many hacks that only work on gcc. For example, most C compilers do not
yet support 'inline functions'.
please
6 matches
Mail list logo