Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> I don't see the problem. shmem_getpage_locked appears to back off
> correctly if it encounters a swap-cached page already existing if
> swapin_readahead has installed the page first, at least with the
> code in 2.4.3-ac5.
But the
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
I don't see the problem. shmem_getpage_locked appears to back off
correctly if it encounters a swap-cached page already existing if
swapin_readahead has installed the page first, at least with the
code in 2.4.3-ac5.
But the swap
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 08:31:07PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > > There is a nasty race between shmem_getpage_locked() and
> > > swapin_readahead() with the new shmem code (introduced in
> >
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > There is a nasty race between shmem_getpage_locked() and
> > swapin_readahead() with the new shmem code (introduced in
> > 2.4.3-ac3 and merged in the main tree in 2.4.4-pre3):
>
> > I don't see any
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
There is a nasty race between shmem_getpage_locked() and
swapin_readahead() with the new shmem code (introduced in
2.4.3-ac3 and merged in the main tree in 2.4.4-pre3):
I don't see any clean fix
5 matches
Mail list logo
