Andrew Morton wrote:
> It still doesn't compile with gcc-2.91.66 because of the "#define
> rwsemdebug(FMT, ...)" thing. What can we do about this?
Hmmm... It probably needs to be made conditional on the version of the
compiler by means of the macros that hold the version numbers.
> I
David Howells wrote:
>
> Here's the RW semaphore patch attempt #4. This fixes the bugs that Andrew
> Morton's test cases showed up.
>
It still doesn't compile with gcc-2.91.66 because of the
"#define rwsemdebug(FMT, ...)" thing. What can we do
about this?
I cooked up a few more tests,
David Howells wrote:
Here's the RW semaphore patch attempt #4. This fixes the bugs that Andrew
Morton's test cases showed up.
It still doesn't compile with gcc-2.91.66 because of the
"#define rwsemdebug(FMT, ...)" thing. What can we do
about this?
I cooked up a few more tests, generally
Here's the RW semaphore patch attempt #4. This fixes the bugs that Andrew
Morton's test cases showed up.
It simplifies the __wake_up_ctx_common() function and adds an iterative clause
to the end of rwsem_wake().
David
diff -uNr linux-2.4.3/arch/i386/config.in linux-rwsem/arch/i386/config.in
Here's the RW semaphore patch attempt #4. This fixes the bugs that Andrew
Morton's test cases showed up.
It simplifies the __wake_up_ctx_common() function and adds an iterative clause
to the end of rwsem_wake().
David
diff -uNr linux-2.4.3/arch/i386/config.in linux-rwsem/arch/i386/config.in
5 matches
Mail list logo