Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT,NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-13 Thread Urban Widmark
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: > I think your testprogram is broken (or else my testprogram is broken :). Yes, you were right. Mine must have been broken (possibly caused by trying to make it readable :). Thanks. Alan, if you still have the patch please apply it to smbfs in 2.2

Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-13 Thread Igor Yu. Zhbanov
Hello, sorry for slow response. (I have lost and found your first letter.) On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Urban Widmark wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: > ... > > > I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format > > of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7

Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS=UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-13 Thread Igor Yu. Zhbanov
Hello, sorry for slow response. (I have lost and found your first letter.) On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Urban Widmark wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: ... I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7 bits,

Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS=UNIX in FAT,NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-13 Thread Urban Widmark
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: I think your testprogram is broken (or else my testprogram is broken :). Yes, you were right. Mine must have been broken (possibly caused by trying to make it readable :). Thanks. Alan, if you still have the patch please apply it to smbfs in 2.2

Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT,NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-06 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: > Hello! Hello again > As I see now in 2.2.18pre24 NCPFS is fixed but VFAT and SMBFS doesn't. (This > happened because the maintainer of NCPFS resent my patch to Alan Cox but only the > part of patch related to NCPFS). So I resent you patch for VFAT

Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS=UNIX in FAT,NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-06 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: Hello! Hello again As I see now in 2.2.18pre24 NCPFS is fixed but VFAT and SMBFS doesn't. (This happened because the maintainer of NCPFS resent my patch to Alan Cox but only the part of patch related to NCPFS). So I resent you patch for VFAT and

[PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-05 Thread Igor Yu. Zhbanov
Hello! Few weeks ago I have sent the following letter: On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: > Hello! > > I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format > of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7 bits, month - 4 bits, day - 5 bits). > > There are two problems:

[PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS=UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

2000-12-05 Thread Igor Yu. Zhbanov
Hello! Few weeks ago I have sent the following letter: On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote: Hello! I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7 bits, month - 4 bits, day - 5 bits). There are two problems: 1) It