Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
> be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-frv/dma-mapping.h | 10 --
include/asm-frv/scatterlist.h | 10 ++
2 files
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, David Howells wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
> > be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
>
> Why have you discarded the comment?
>
> David
whoops, my mistake.
Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
> be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Why have you discarded the comment?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
> be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
whoops, just noticed that i hadn't updated my sig to reflect
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
if david prefers to handle this because he wants to do something
differently, that's cool.
not
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
if david prefers to handle this because he wants to do something
differently, that's cool.
not
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whoops, just noticed that i hadn't updated my sig to reflect my new
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Why have you discarded the comment?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, David Howells wrote:
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Why have you discarded the comment?
David
whoops, my mistake. i'll
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/asm-frv/dma-mapping.h | 10 --
include/asm-frv/scatterlist.h | 10 ++
2 files
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be consistent with other architectures, these two DMA macros should
be defined in scatterlist.h as opposed to dma-mapping.h
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this
12 matches
Mail list logo