Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 04/19/2016 09:23 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: ... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Hello Davidlohr, Are you sure

Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 04/19/2016 09:23 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: ... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Hello Davidlohr, Are you sure

Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-19 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: ... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Hello Davidlohr, Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person?

Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-19 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: ... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Hello Davidlohr, Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person?

Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-19 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: ... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Hello Davidlohr, Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person? I have helped to review a change in this code

Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-19 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: ... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Hello Davidlohr, Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person? I have helped to review a change in this code

[PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-16 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso --- lib/irq_poll.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/irq_poll.c b/lib/irq_poll.c index

[PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock()

2016-04-16 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso --- lib/irq_poll.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/irq_poll.c b/lib/irq_poll.c index 836f7db4e548..2a6ae2720ccb 100644