Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do those patches convert all this code over to full use of the kthread
> API? Because it seems that a conversion would be straightforward, and
> is needed.
No. They delete all that code entirely and use workqueues instead. So, I
suppose merging
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do those patches convert all this code over to full use of the kthread
API? Because it seems that a conversion would be straightforward, and
is needed.
No. They delete all that code entirely and use workqueues instead. So, I
suppose merging Eric's
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:38 +0100
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
> > to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
> > and daemonize making the code
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
>> to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
>> and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
>
Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
> to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
> and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
Again, please drop in favour of my RxRPC patches.
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
In addition since by default all signals are ignored
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
In addition since by default all signals are
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
In addition since by default all signals are
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
In addition since by default all signals are ignored when
Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
Again, please drop in favour of my RxRPC patches.
David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
Again,
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:38 +0100
David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
and daemonize making the code slightly
12 matches
Mail list logo
