Davidlohr Bueso writes:
> On Tue, 08 Dec 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>>I suppose I'll queue the below into tip/perf/core for next merge window,
>>unless you want it in a hurry?
>
> I'm thinking we'd still want Eric's series on top of this for the reader
> benefits of the lock.
We will see
On Tue, 08 Dec 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I suppose I'll queue the below into tip/perf/core for next merge window,
unless you want it in a hurry?
I'm thinking we'd still want Eric's series on top of this for the reader
benefits of the lock.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:34 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I suppose I'll queue the below into tip/perf/core for next merge window,
> unless you want it in a hurry?
LGTM, and there's no hurry. This is not a new thing, and I don't think
it has been a problem in practice.
Linus
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:10 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > PeterZ, is there something I'm missing?
> >
> > Like this?
> >
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200828123720.gz1362...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> Yes,
4 matches
Mail list logo