Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:34:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:34:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:34:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
> >
> > So if we have:
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
> >
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:38:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
> >
> > So if we have:
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
> >
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:38:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
So if we have:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
So if we have:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:34:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
>
> So if we have:
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
>
> then this is a oops candidate.
At first glance,
On Sunday 20 January 2008 08:25:49 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
So if we have:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
then this is a oops candidate.
At first glance, this can't
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4b6d5): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:
> (between 'rcu_cpu_notify' and
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4b6d5): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:
(between 'rcu_cpu_notify' and 'wakeme_after_rcu')
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4b6d5): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:
(between 'rcu_cpu_notify' and 'wakeme_after_rcu')
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/rcupdate.c |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcu_online_cpu() should be __cpuinit instead of __devinit.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4b6d5): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:
(between 'rcu_cpu_notify' and 'wakeme_after_rcu')
14 matches
Mail list logo