On 11 May 2016 at 07:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 10 May 2016 at 23:07, Mathias Krause wrote:
>> The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
>> ("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
>>
On 11 May 2016 at 07:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 10 May 2016 at 23:07, Mathias Krause wrote:
>> The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
>> ("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
>> independent code in lib/extable.c. However, the patch
On 10 May 2016 at 23:07, Mathias Krause wrote:
> The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
> ("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
> independent code in lib/extable.c. However, the patch was mangled
> somehow on its
On 10 May 2016 at 23:07, Mathias Krause wrote:
> The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
> ("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
> independent code in lib/extable.c. However, the patch was mangled
> somehow on its way into the kernel from
The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
independent code in lib/extable.c. However, the patch was mangled
somehow on its way into the kernel from the last version posted at [1].
The committed version
The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
independent code in lib/extable.c. However, the patch was mangled
somehow on its way into the kernel from the last version posted at [1].
The committed version
6 matches
Mail list logo