From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 09:16:00 +0100
> Please don't apply it yet as the series is still under active
> discussion - for now
Fine, reverted.
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 09:16:00 +0100
> Please don't apply it yet as the series is still under active
> discussion - for now
Fine, reverted.
* David Miller wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:28:41 -0500
>
> > I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes
> > in his
> > tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
* David Miller wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:28:41 -0500
>
> > I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes
> > in his
> > tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
> > somebody on the tracing side.
> ...
>
From: Josef Bacik
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:28:41 -0500
> I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in
> his
> tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
> somebody on the tracing side.
...
> A lot of our error
From: Josef Bacik
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:28:41 -0500
> I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in
> his
> tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
> somebody on the tracing side.
...
> A lot of our error paths are not well
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:43:25AM +0900, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 11/8/17 5:28 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes
> > in his
> > tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
> > somebody on the
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:43:25AM +0900, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 11/8/17 5:28 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes
> > in his
> > tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
> > somebody on the
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:43:25 +0900
> looks great to me.
> Peter,
> could you please review x86 bits?
I'm still waiting for this.
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:43:25 +0900
> looks great to me.
> Peter,
> could you please review x86 bits?
I'm still waiting for this.
On 11/8/17 5:28 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in his
tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
somebody on the tracing side.
v4->v5:
- disallow kprobe_override programs from being put in the prog
On 11/8/17 5:28 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in his
tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
somebody on the tracing side.
v4->v5:
- disallow kprobe_override programs from being put in the prog
I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in his
tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
somebody on the tracing side.
v4->v5:
- disallow kprobe_override programs from being put in the prog map array so we
don't tail call into
I'm sending this through Dave since it'll conflict with other BPF changes in his
tree, but since it touches tracing as well Dave would like a review from
somebody on the tracing side.
v4->v5:
- disallow kprobe_override programs from being put in the prog map array so we
don't tail call into
14 matches
Mail list logo