The 12/15/2020 09:51, Bob Liu wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> On 12/12/20 12:56 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>> While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
> >>> blk_interposer as a
On 12/15/20 7:51 AM, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Folks,
On 12/12/20 12:56 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll
Hi Folks,
On 12/12/20 12:56 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>> While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
>>> blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll let others make the
>>>
On 12/11/20 11:03 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/11/20 6:04 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/11/20 9:56 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
On 12/11/20 6:04 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:56 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll let
On 12/11/20 9:56 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>> While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
>>> blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll let others make the
>>> call.
>>
>>
On 12/11/20 5:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll let others make the
call.
That's an unequivocal rule.
As such, I'll defer to Jens,
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 11:32am -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 9:58am -0500,
> Sergei Shtepa wrote:
>
> > The 12/09/2020 16:51, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 8:01am -0500,
> > > Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all.
> > > >
> > > > I try to
On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of
> blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll let others make the
> call.
That's an unequivocal rule.
> As such, I'll defer to Jens, Christoph and others on whether your
>
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 9:58am -0500,
Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> The 12/09/2020 16:51, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 8:01am -0500,
> > Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > I try to suggest the Block Layer Interposer (blk_interposer) again.
> > > It`s allows to
The 12/09/2020 16:51, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 8:01am -0500,
> Sergei Shtepa wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I try to suggest the Block Layer Interposer (blk_interposer) again.
> > It`s allows to intercept bio requests, remap bio to another devices
> > or add new bios.
> >
>
On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 8:01am -0500,
Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I try to suggest the Block Layer Interposer (blk_interposer) again.
> It`s allows to intercept bio requests, remap bio to another devices
> or add new bios.
>
> Initially, blk_interposer was designed to be compatible with
Hi all.
I try to suggest the Block Layer Interposer (blk_interposer) again.
It`s allows to intercept bio requests, remap bio to another devices
or add new bios.
Initially, blk_interposer was designed to be compatible with
device mapper. Our (my and Hannes) previous attempt to offer
13 matches
Mail list logo
