On Tue, 10 May, at 07:43:14PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A recent commit caused an interactivity/starvation issue because we wrecked rq
> local wakeup preemption.
>
> These patches rectify this while also (hopefully) keeping the problem that led
> to the fault patch fixed.
>
> Mike, Pavan, could
On Tue, 10 May, at 07:43:14PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A recent commit caused an interactivity/starvation issue because we wrecked rq
> local wakeup preemption.
>
> These patches rectify this while also (hopefully) keeping the problem that led
> to the fault patch fixed.
>
> Mike, Pavan, could
Hi Peter,
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A recent commit caused an interactivity/starvation issue because we wrecked rq
> local wakeup preemption.
>
> These patches rectify this while also (hopefully) keeping the problem that led
> to the fault
Hi Peter,
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A recent commit caused an interactivity/starvation issue because we wrecked rq
> local wakeup preemption.
>
> These patches rectify this while also (hopefully) keeping the problem that led
> to the fault patch fixed.
>
> Mike,
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 19:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Mike, Pavan, could you guys please confirm?
Plugging the series into master.today, all seems peachy on my end.
-Mike
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 19:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Mike, Pavan, could you guys please confirm?
Plugging the series into master.today, all seems peachy on my end.
-Mike
A recent commit caused an interactivity/starvation issue because we wrecked rq
local wakeup preemption.
These patches rectify this while also (hopefully) keeping the problem that led
to the fault patch fixed.
Mike, Pavan, could you guys please confirm?
A recent commit caused an interactivity/starvation issue because we wrecked rq
local wakeup preemption.
These patches rectify this while also (hopefully) keeping the problem that led
to the fault patch fixed.
Mike, Pavan, could you guys please confirm?
8 matches
Mail list logo