On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 03:21:40PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 2020-11-08 1:02 p.m., Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Or I can carry them if you wish. My expected changes in response to
> > this series are shown below, and are also what I used to test it.
>
> Thanks Paul - that would get
On 2020-11-08 1:02 p.m., Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Or I can carry them if you wish. My expected changes in response to
> this series are shown below, and are also what I used to test it.
Thanks Paul - that would get linux-next exposure w/o me pestering sfr.
If nobody else has objections,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 11:08:12AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The basic objective here was to add support for "nohz_full=8-last" and/or
> "rcu_nocbs="4-last" -- essentially introduce "last" as a portable
> reference evaluated at boot/runtime for anything using a CPU list.
>
> The thinking
The basic objective here was to add support for "nohz_full=8-last" and/or
"rcu_nocbs="4-last" -- essentially introduce "last" as a portable
reference evaluated at boot/runtime for anything using a CPU list.
The thinking behind this, is that people carve off a few early CPUs to
support
4 matches
Mail list logo
