Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:26:24PM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:50:01PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:42:19AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > This series introduces

Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:50:01PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:42:19AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > This series introduces a bulk order-0 page allocator with sunrpc and > > > > the network

Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:09:27PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > For the vmalloc we should be able to allocating on a specific NUMA node, > > at least the current interface takes it into account. As far as i see > > the current

Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > For the vmalloc we should be able to allocating on a specific NUMA node, > at least the current interface takes it into account. As far as i see > the current interface allocate on a current node: > > static inline unsigned long

Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:50:01PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:42:19AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > This series introduces a bulk order-0 page allocator with sunrpc and > > > the network page pool being the first users. The implementation is not > > > efficient

Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:50:01PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:42:19AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > This series introduces a bulk order-0 page allocator with sunrpc and > > the network page pool being the first users. The implementation is not > > efficient as

Re: [PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:42:19AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > This series introduces a bulk order-0 page allocator with sunrpc and > the network page pool being the first users. The implementation is not > efficient as semantics needed to be ironed out first. If no other semantic > changes are

[PATCH 0/9 v6] Introduce a bulk order-0 page allocator with two in-tree users

2021-03-25 Thread Mel Gorman
This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.14-rc4. If Andrew's tree is not the testing baseline then the following git tree will work. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux.git mm-bulk-rebase-v6r7 Changelog