> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:56:27 -0700
> Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
> > > Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:56:27 -0700
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
If we
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:56:27 -0700
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
> > Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
> > > first three
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
> > first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
>
> Yes, they're
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
> first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
Yes, they're kinda a series of their own. But I still think we really
want this in -mm. As we've seen on
Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
> first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
FWIW this set (through 22) looks good to me.
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
FWIW this set (through 22) looks good to me.
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
Yes, they're kinda a series of their own. But I still think we really
want this in -mm. As we've seen on the
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
Yes, they're kinda a
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
first three patches for
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:56:27 -0700
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
If we can't
If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
---
Why do we need r/o bind mounts?
This feature allows a read-only view into a read-write filesystem.
In the process of doing that, it also provides infrastructure for
If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
---
Why do we need r/o bind mounts?
This feature allows a read-only view into a read-write filesystem.
In the process of doing that, it also provides infrastructure for
14 matches
Mail list logo