On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 22:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > >
>
> [...]
>
>> ---
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Clarify average
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 22:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > >
>
> [...]
>
>> ---
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Clarify average performance
>> computation
>>
>> The core_pct_busy field of struct
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 22:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
[...]
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Clarify average performance
> computation
>
> The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
> average
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 22:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
[...]
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Clarify average performance
> computation
>
> The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
> average performace during the last sampling
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:58:04 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 21:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:58:04 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 21:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Rafael
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 21:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 21:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
>> average
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
>> average performace during the last sampling period (in percent)
>> and not
On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
> average performace during the last sampling period (in percent)
> and not the utilization of the core as
On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 01:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
> average performace during the last sampling period (in percent)
> and not the utilization of the core as suggested by its name
> which is
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
average performace during the last sampling period (in percent)
and not the utilization of the core as suggested by its name
which is confusing.
For this reason, change the name of
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the
average performace during the last sampling period (in percent)
and not the utilization of the core as suggested by its name
which is confusing.
For this reason, change the name of that field to core_avg_perf
14 matches
Mail list logo