Hi David,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:45:25PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
> secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
>
> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
Hi David,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:45:25PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
> secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
>
> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
I reviewed the context for this patch.
Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 14 +-
Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 14 +-
drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 23
On 24 May 2017 at 06:54, David Howells wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> > + UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the
>> > firmware
>> > + will only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Secure boot mode
>> >
On 24 May 2017 at 06:54, David Howells wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> > + UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the
>> > firmware
>> > + will only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Secure boot mode
>> > may
>> > + be determined from EFI
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > + UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the
> > firmware
> > + will only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Secure boot mode
> > may
> > + be determined from EFI variables provided by the BIOS if
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > + UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the
> > firmware
> > + will only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Secure boot mode
> > may
> > + be determined from EFI variables provided by the BIOS if not
>
> Please replace
First of all, apologies for taking so long to respond.
On 6 April 2017 at 13:49, David Howells wrote:
> Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
> secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
>
> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
First of all, apologies for taking so long to respond.
On 6 April 2017 at 13:49, David Howells wrote:
> Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
> secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
>
> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
> ---
>
>
Hi Ard,
Any thoughts on these patches?
Thanks,
David
Hi Ard,
Any thoughts on these patches?
Thanks,
David
Sorry, I forgot to include a cover note.
These five patches would replace 1-3 & 6 from my Kernel Lockdown series. The
additional patch moves the secure boot switch from x86 to generic code.
David
Sorry, I forgot to include a cover note.
These five patches would replace 1-3 & 6 from my Kernel Lockdown series. The
additional patch moves the secure boot switch from x86 to generic code.
David
Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c| 14 +-
Move the switch-statement in x86's setup_arch() that inteprets the
secure_boot boot parameter to generic code.
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c| 14 +-
drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 23
16 matches
Mail list logo