On Tue 13-04-21 14:51:47, Muchun Song wrote:
> The pages aren't accounted at the root level, so do not charge the page
> to the root memcg in page replacement. Although we do not display the
> value (mem_cgroup_usage) so there shouldn't be any actual problem, but
> there is a WARN_ON_ONCE in the
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:51:47PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> The pages aren't accounted at the root level, so do not charge the page
> to the root memcg in page replacement. Although we do not display the
> value (mem_cgroup_usage) so there shouldn't be any actual problem, but
> there is a
The pages aren't accounted at the root level, so do not charge the page
to the root memcg in page replacement. Although we do not display the
value (mem_cgroup_usage) so there shouldn't be any actual problem, but
there is a WARN_ON_ONCE in the page_counter_cancel(). Who knows if it
will trigger?
3 matches
Mail list logo
