Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rt1] SMC91x: Use special_lock when CONFIG_PREEMPT_[HARD|SOFT]IRQS

2008-02-14 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote: > The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard > IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- >

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rt1] SMC91x: Use special_lock when CONFIG_PREEMPT_[HARD|SOFT]IRQS

2008-02-14 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote: The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[PATCH 2.6.24-rt1] SMC91x: Use special_lock when CONFIG_PREEMPT_[HARD|SOFT]IRQS

2008-02-13 Thread Kevin Hilman
The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/smc91x.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2.6.24-rt1] SMC91x: Use special_lock when CONFIG_PREEMPT_[HARD|SOFT]IRQS

2008-02-13 Thread Kevin Hilman
The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/smc91x.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git