Hi Baoquan,
At 02/08/2018 09:23 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/08/18 at 09:14am, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:45 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/08/2018 09:23 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/08/18 at 09:14am, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:45 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
On 02/08/18 at 09:14am, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> At 02/07/2018 08:45 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Baoquan,
> > > > >
> >
On 02/08/18 at 09:14am, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> At 02/07/2018 08:45 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Baoquan,
> > > > >
> >
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:45 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:45 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi
On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
>
> At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > Hi Baoquan,
> > >
> > > At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Kirill,Mike
> > > > >
>
On 02/07/18 at 08:34pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
>
> At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > Hi Baoquan,
> > >
> > > At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Kirill,Mike
> > > > >
>
At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Kirill,Mike
At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A.
At 02/07/2018 08:27 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Kirill,Mike
At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A.
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > Hi Kirill,Mike
> > >
> > > At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:17pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > Hi Kirill,Mike
> > >
> > > At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Kirill,Mike
At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi All,
I
Hi Baoquan,
At 02/07/2018 08:08 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Kirill,Mike
At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi All,
I
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Kirill,Mike
>
> At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I met the makedumpfile
On 02/07/18 at 08:00pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi Kirill,Mike
>
> At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I met the makedumpfile
Hi Kirill,Mike
At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi All,
I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
this patch. Did I missed
Hi Kirill,Mike
At 02/07/2018 06:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi All,
I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
this patch. Did I missed
On 02/07/18 at 05:25pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
> this patch. Did I missed something else?
readmem: Can't convert a virtual address(88007ffd7000) to physical
Should not related to this patch. Otherwise your code
On 02/07/18 at 05:25pm, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
> this patch. Did I missed something else?
readmem: Can't convert a virtual address(88007ffd7000) to physical
Should not related to this patch. Otherwise your code
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
> > this patch. Did I missed something else?
>
> None I'm aware of.
>
> Is there a
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:41 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
> > this patch. Did I missed something else?
>
> None I'm aware of.
>
> Is there a
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
> this patch. Did I missed something else?
None I'm aware of.
Is there a reason to suspect that the issue is related to the bug this patch
fixed?
--
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
> this patch. Did I missed something else?
None I'm aware of.
Is there a reason to suspect that the issue is related to the bug this patch
fixed?
--
Hi All,
I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
this patch. Did I missed something else?
In fedora27 host:
[douly@localhost code]$ ./makedumpfile -d 31 --message-level 31 -x
vmlinux_4.15+ vmcore_4.15+_from_cp_command vmcore_4.15+
sadump: does not have partition
Hi All,
I met the makedumpfile failed in the upstream kernel which contained
this patch. Did I missed something else?
In fedora27 host:
[douly@localhost code]$ ./makedumpfile -d 31 --message-level 31 -x
vmlinux_4.15+ vmcore_4.15+_from_cp_command vmcore_4.15+
sadump: does not have partition
On 01/25/18 at 06:50pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:54PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi Kirill,
> >
> > I setup qemu 2.9.0 to test 5-level on kexec/kdump support. While both
> > kexec and kdump reset to BIOS immediately after triggering. I saw your
> > patch adding
On 01/25/18 at 06:50pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:54PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi Kirill,
> >
> > I setup qemu 2.9.0 to test 5-level on kexec/kdump support. While both
> > kexec and kdump reset to BIOS immediately after triggering. I saw your
> > patch adding
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:54PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> I setup qemu 2.9.0 to test 5-level on kexec/kdump support. While both
> kexec and kdump reset to BIOS immediately after triggering. I saw your
> patch adding 5-level paging support for kexec. Wonder if your test
>
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:54PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> I setup qemu 2.9.0 to test 5-level on kexec/kdump support. While both
> kexec and kdump reset to BIOS immediately after triggering. I saw your
> patch adding 5-level paging support for kexec. Wonder if your test
>
Hi Kirill,
I setup qemu 2.9.0 to test 5-level on kexec/kdump support. While both
kexec and kdump reset to BIOS immediately after triggering. I saw your
patch adding 5-level paging support for kexec. Wonder if your test
succeeded to jump into kexec/kdump kernel, and what else I need to
make it. By
Hi Kirill,
I setup qemu 2.9.0 to test 5-level on kexec/kdump support. While both
kexec and kdump reset to BIOS immediately after triggering. I saw your
patch adding 5-level paging support for kexec. Wonder if your test
succeeded to jump into kexec/kdump kernel, and what else I need to
make it. By
>Hm, this fix means that the vmlinux symbol table and vmcoreinfo have
>different values for mem_section. That seems... odd. I had to patch
>makedumpfile to fix the case of an explicit vmlinux being passed on the
>command line (which I realized I don't need to do, but it should still
>work):
Looks
>Hm, this fix means that the vmlinux symbol table and vmcoreinfo have
>different values for mem_section. That seems... odd. I had to patch
>makedumpfile to fix the case of an explicit vmlinux being passed on the
>command line (which I realized I don't need to do, but it should still
>work):
Looks
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:55:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/10/18 at 02:16pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:55:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/10/18 at 02:16pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM
On 01/10/18 at 02:16pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He
On 01/10/18 at 02:16pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He
On 01/10/18 at 02:16pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He
On 01/10/18 at 02:16pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:08:04AM +, Dave Young wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > > As for the macro name, VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY sounds
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > > As for the macro name, VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY sounds
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > > As for the macro name, VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY sounds better.
Yep, that's better.
> > I still think using vmcoreinfo_append_str is
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:24:40PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > > As for the macro name, VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY sounds better.
Yep, that's better.
> > I still think using vmcoreinfo_append_str is
On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 01/09/18 at 03:13am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On 01/09/18 at 01:41pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 01/09/18 at 03:13am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/09/18 at 03:13am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hi Kirill,
> > > >
> > > > As Mike reported it
On 01/09/18 at 09:09am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/09/18 at 03:13am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hi Kirill,
> > > >
> > > > As Mike reported it
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 03:13 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> Mike, could you test this? (On top of the rest of the fixes.)
homer:..crash/2018-01-09-04:25 # ll
total 1863604
-rw--- 1 root root 66255 Jan 9 04:25 dmesg.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root182 Jan 9 04:25 README.txt
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 03:13 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> Mike, could you test this? (On top of the rest of the fixes.)
homer:..crash/2018-01-09-04:25 # ll
total 1863604
-rw--- 1 root root 66255 Jan 9 04:25 dmesg.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root182 Jan 9 04:25 README.txt
On 01/09/18 at 03:13am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > hi Kirill,
> > >
> > > As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
> >
On 01/09/18 at 03:13am, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > hi Kirill,
> > >
> > > As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
> >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > hi Kirill,
> >
> > As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
> > 83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:46:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > hi Kirill,
> >
> > As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
> > 83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> hi Kirill,
>
> As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
> 83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes:
>
> 83e3c48729d9: mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for
> CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y
>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> hi Kirill,
>
> As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
> 83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes:
>
> 83e3c48729d9: mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for
> CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y
>
hi Kirill,
As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes:
83e3c48729d9: mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y
629a359bdb0e: mm/sparsemem: Fix ARM64 boot crash when
hi Kirill,
As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit
83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes:
83e3c48729d9: mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y
629a359bdb0e: mm/sparsemem: Fix ARM64 boot crash when
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 09:33 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:15:33AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > > It was part of the prep for the KTPI code from what I can tell. If you
> > > think it should be reverted, just let me know and I'll be glad to do so.
> >
> > No
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 09:33 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:15:33AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > > It was part of the prep for the KTPI code from what I can tell. If you
> > > think it should be reverted, just let me know and I'll be glad to do so.
> >
> > No
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:10:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:47:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 08-01-18 08:53:08, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:10:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:47:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 08-01-18 08:53:08, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:47:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 08-01-18 08:53:08, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:47:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 08-01-18 08:53:08, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon 08-01-18 08:53:08, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018
On Mon 08-01-18 08:53:08, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:15:33AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 08:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:15:33AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 08:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 08:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 08:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > >
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > >
On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > >
On Sun 07-01-18 13:44:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > >
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections,
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections,
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 11:18:47AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 11:18:47AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any
On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> >
> > FYI, this broke kdump, or
On Sun 07-01-18 10:11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> >
> > FYI, this broke kdump, or
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 10:11 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> >
> > FYI,
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 10:11 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> >
> > FYI,
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> FYI, this broke kdump, or rather the makedumpfile part thereof.
> Forward looking
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 06:14:22AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> FYI, this broke kdump, or rather the makedumpfile part thereof.
> Forward looking
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
FYI, this broke kdump, or rather the makedumpfile part thereof.
Forward looking wreckage is par for the kdump course, but...
> --
>
>
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:45 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
FYI, this broke kdump, or rather the makedumpfile part thereof.
Forward looking wreckage is par for the kdump course, but...
> --
>
>
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:22:09PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 22 December 2017 at 19:48, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> >> know.
> >>
>
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:22:09PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 22 December 2017 at 19:48, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> >> know.
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:18:10AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Kirill A. Shutemov
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:18:10AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Kirill A. Shutemov
> >
> > commit
On 22 December 2017 at 19:48, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> --
>>
>> From: Kirill A. Shutemov
On 22 December 2017 at 19:48, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> --
>>
>> From: Kirill A. Shutemov
>>
>> commit
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Kirill A. Shutemov
>
> commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Kirill A. Shutemov
>
> commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream.
>
> Size of the mem_section[]
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Kirill A. Shutemov
commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream.
Size of the mem_section[] array depends on the size of the physical address
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Kirill A. Shutemov
commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream.
Size of the mem_section[] array depends on the size of the physical address
space.
In preparation for boot-time
98 matches
Mail list logo