Re: [PATCH RFC v3 01/35] mm: page_alloc: Add gfp_flags parameter to arch_alloc_page()

2024-01-30 Thread Alexandru Elisei
Hi, On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 09:56:10AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 1/29/24 17:11, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:18:59AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> On 1/25/24 22:12, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > >>> Extend the usefulness of

Re: [PATCH RFC v3 01/35] mm: page_alloc: Add gfp_flags parameter to arch_alloc_page()

2024-01-29 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 1/29/24 17:11, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:18:59AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 1/25/24 22:12, Alexandru Elisei wrote: >>> Extend the usefulness of arch_alloc_page() by adding the gfp_flags >>> parameter. >> Although the change here is harmless in

Re: [PATCH RFC v3 01/35] mm: page_alloc: Add gfp_flags parameter to arch_alloc_page()

2024-01-29 Thread Alexandru Elisei
Hi, On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:18:59AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 1/25/24 22:12, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > Extend the usefulness of arch_alloc_page() by adding the gfp_flags > > parameter. > > Although the change here is harmless in itself, it will definitely benefit > from some

Re: [PATCH RFC v3 01/35] mm: page_alloc: Add gfp_flags parameter to arch_alloc_page()

2024-01-28 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 1/25/24 22:12, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Extend the usefulness of arch_alloc_page() by adding the gfp_flags > parameter. Although the change here is harmless in itself, it will definitely benefit from some additional context explaining the rationale, taking into account why-how

[PATCH RFC v3 01/35] mm: page_alloc: Add gfp_flags parameter to arch_alloc_page()

2024-01-25 Thread Alexandru Elisei
Extend the usefulness of arch_alloc_page() by adding the gfp_flags parameter. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei --- Changes since rfc v2: * New patch. arch/s390/include/asm/page.h | 2 +- arch/s390/mm/page-states.c | 2 +- include/linux/gfp.h | 2 +- mm/page_alloc.c | 2